 |
Did the Rwandan Evaluation Change anything?A report by the Joint Evaluation Follow-up Monitoring and Facilitation Network (JEFF)The speed of onset and scale of the Great Lakes emergency which unfolded in April 1994 leading to genocide and internal displacement in Rwanda and massive refugee displacements to Zaire and Tanzania presented one of the greatest challenges the humanitarian aid community has ever had to face. Recognising the unprecedented nature of this emergency and the humanitarian response, governments were eager to learn as many lessons as possible from the events of 1994 and 1995. A Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda was therefore undertaken and funded by numerous governments. The final report was launched in March 1996. This multi-donor funded evaluation of an emergency and subsequent response was the largest of its type ever under-taken. The evaluation had four components and was published in four separate studies; - an account of the history of the Great Lakes Region - study 1 - a study of the genocide in Rwanda - study 2 - an evaluation of the humanitarian response to the emergency in Zaire, Tanzania and Rwanda - study 3 - an evaluation of the rehabilitation initiatives in the region - study 4 The main findings of the four studies were
summarised in a synthesis report which contained no less than 64 recommendations
These recommendations varied enormously in range. For example, there
were specific recommendations aimed at ensuring; more effective prevention
and suppression of genocide, more effective conflict early warning systems,
and greater accountability of humanitarian agencies. A number of the recommendations
in the synthesis report were influenced by certain findings in study
3 regarding the provision of food and nutrition support to refugee and
IDPs . The food and nutrition section of study 3 singled out;
These difficulties were then related to
a set of underlying factors including:
The recommendations in the synthesis report
which were most directly related to problems in the food and nutrition
sector were those on:
A Joint Evaluation Follow-up Monitoring and Facilitation Network (JEFF) was formed in May 1996. This network was set up to follow up progress arising out of the evaluation recommendations. JEFF recently finalised a report which reviewed the follow-up and impact of the Rwandan evaluation fifteen months after its publication. This in itself is unusual as evaluations so often are left to gather dust on shelves of commissioning agencies. The JEFF report makes fascinating reading and while taking pains to acknowledge that progress and implementation of recommendations made in the Rwandan evaluation cannot be fully attributed to the evaluation, holds that there are grounds for attributing many initiative at least partly to the joint evaluation. The JEFF report estimates that at least
two thirds of the recommendations have had at least some positive outcome
(see table below) but also expresses concern that 11% of recommendations
have not been formally discussed or raised by those agencies to whom the
recommendations are directed. Most of these unaddressed recommendations
are to do with 'Fostering Policy Coherence in the UN Security Council Secretariat
and General Assembly and Early Suppression of Genocide'.
Copies of the multi-donor evaluation
of the Great Lakes Emergency and the JEFF report can be obtained from
Helen Awan, ODI, London, Fax 44 8698 5610, e-mail: h.awan@odi.org.uk.
|