Bahr-el-Ghazal Nutritionists Meet 

Nutritionists from six NGOs working in Bahr-El-Ghazal, South Sudan, met in Lokichoggio in August 1998 to act on their mounting concern over the management of nutrition responses to the current crisis. Signatories to the resulting document (20/8/98) recognised the substantial efforts already made by agencies  to address the crisis. In particular, the quantity and quality of the WFP general ration had improved and distributions were now better organised, while the UNICEF supported measles campaign has reduced mortality risk among the malnourished.  The nutritionists also identified  room for improvement in the OLS (Operation Lifeline Sudan) operations in  Bahr-el-Ghazal in the following areas: 

General food distribution 
In spite of improvements in the general ration  there was still a need to plug food gaps until  the next  harvest at the end of the year and maybe even  longer in some areas. Furthermore, general ration targeting needed to be both refined and   informed by food economy data and information from NGOs 

Selective feeding programming 
Concern was expressed regarding  nutritional needs assessment methodologies  and the way in which data are being used. Though recognising that it is difficult to  conduct standard nutritional surveys in the state, the group nevertheless found  worrying the use of the UNICEF/OLS planning figures based  on nutritional data of varying reliability on self selected populations at unrepresentative sites. 

The following methodologies and activities were considered unacceptable by participants:
· extrapolation of anthropometric  data to the entire state and use of these data to define feeding programme design at 38 intervention sites,i.e. selective feeding programme sites were being established without taking account of variation in need. 
· prioritisation (by implication) of cargo space for Supplementary Feeding Programmes foods in competition with  General Ration foodstuffs, based on inadequate assessment of impact on existing distribution arrangements and the possibility that that this might jeopardise the level of general ration distribution. 
As the  pattern of malnutrition was believed  to be uneven  the group  urged that the response should be flexible. Instead of implementing selective feeding programmes for  38,000 people at  pre-identified sites, participants  recommended that OLS: 

· increase the general ration 
· consider blanket feeding for children <5yrs while assessment of critical sites is underway 
· increase needs assessment capacity among staff 
· find out where feeding centre beneficiaries are coming from and determine food and nutrition needs in those areas 
· decentralise and implement services which will tackle underlying  causes of malnutrition as well as symptoms e.g. water provision and/or mobile health-care 
· encourage information exchange among NGOs, within OLS and others to better inform the whole effort and to help refine food and nutrition programming in this phase. 

Feeding programmes 
Standard reporting to an OLS focal point on process and outcome indicators of each feeding programme was recommended, so that the progress of all feeding interventions could  be  monitored in a standardised manner. Also, before on-site supplementary feeding is undertaken  fully adequate sanitation, water, and hygiene precautions should be assured. 

Exit strategies 
It was recommended that prior to the harvest late this year, discussions should be held with local farmers, herders, fishers, traders, administrators and other locals on how best to phase out feeding programmes, and how to establish local emergency preparedness. In September, the OLS monthly Emergency Nutrition Co-ordination Meeting, usually held in Nairobi, met in Lokichoggio instead, 21/9/98. In addition to addressing the above concerns expressed by the nutritionists, participants also established a task force to review and make recommendations on nutrition programme quality in South Sudan, following up one of the recommendations of a recent OLS/SPLA Targeting and Vulnerability Task Force. We will include reports of these activities in the next issue of RNN. 

More information contact: Judith Appleton, 
Senior Nutritionist, Oxfam, 274 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ, England. 
E-mail: jappleton@oxfam.org.uk

Issue contents | ENN home