Letter on revised MSF Nutrition Guidelines draft, by E.C. Schofield, Ann Ashworth, Mike Golden and Y. Grellety

Dear Field Exchange,

Revised MSF nutrition guidelines

We would like to comment on the draft of the newly revised MSF guidelines for the treatment of severe malnutrition (Issue 12, April 2001). We appreciate that some practices have to be simplified in emergency settings, especially initially when there is a sudden influx of large numbers of patients, and staff are newly recruited. We are concerned, however, that the proposed divergence from 'best practice' will result in unnecessary deaths.

  1. Standard diet (one vs two formulas). There are very considerable risks in simplifying feeding to just one formula (F-100) and failing to give F-75 in the initial phase of treatment (particularly for patients with oedematous malnutrition). For example, two of us (MG, YG) recently visited two therapeutic feeding centres in Africa where kwashiorkor is common. The first centre used the MSF protocol with only F-100 and about 20% of the children died during treatment. In contrast, in a neighbouring centre which used F-75 as the initial treatment, only 5% died. We examined some of the newly admitted children receiving F-100. The first four children we saw were all in heart failure, which MSF correctly emphasise is a risk when F-100 is fed too early. We have had this experience several times-usually the heart failure is misdiagnosed as pneumonia. A 3-times higher mortality was also found among severely malnourished adults fed a single high protein formula from admission (Collins et al, 1998).
    F-100 has too much sodium and protein for the very ill malnourished patient, and too high an osmolarity. F-75 was specifically designed to reduce deaths during treatment by taking into account the damaging effect that malnutrition has on cells and organs. With prepackaged products, it is not difficult to provide both F-75 and F-100. Thus to make F-75: open one red package and empty into 2 litres of water in a red bucket, stir and give according to instructions. For F- 100: open one blue package, empty into 2 litres of water in a blue bucket, stir and give according to instructions.
    Many NGOs (including ACF, CONCERN, GVC, IMC and ICRC) are already using F-75 and F-100, without encountering the difficulties or the confusion that MSF fears.
  2. Feeding frequency. MSF makes no mention of feeding very ill children at night in 24 hour care units. Experience has shown that deaths often occur at night or early morning conventionally ascribed to hypoglycaemia and hypothermia. These deaths can be prevented by night feeding and such a practice should be included in treatment recommendations.
  3. Routine treatment with iron MSF advises: 'Iron with malaria testing'. The meaning of this is not clear, but if it means that iron should be given routinely, this is contrary to WHO advice which is based on evidence of higher mortality when iron is given in the initial phase (Phase 1). In severe malnutrition, reduction in ironbinding transferrin means children are less able to bind all the iron given to them. Any 'free' iron is harmful because it promotes production of highly damaging free radicals. Free iron also promotes the growth of some pathogens, making some infections worse. Thus, iron should never be given during the initial phase of treatment until the child has re-synthesised sufficient iron-binding proteins. It should be given only during the rehabilitation phase.
  4. Antibiotics. MSF advises that antibiotic treatment for adults should be given only if there are signs of infection. This advice conflicts with WHO recommendations. In severe malnutrition the usual signs of infection, such as fever, are often absent and infections remain hidden. Antibiotics should always be given straightaway to all severely malnourished patients, regardless of age.

For the reasons set out above, we do not think that such compromised recommendations should be included in a treatment manual that has previously had a high reputation and been widely used. We encourage MSF to reconsider their guidelines.

Yours sincerely

E. C. Schofield and Ann Ashworth, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Professor M. H. N. Golden,
Dr Y. Grellety.

Reference

Collins S, Myatt M, Golden B. Dietary treatment of severe malnutrition in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 193-9.

More like this

FEX: Letter on standards for severe malnutrition mangement, by Kiross Tefera, with response by Saskia van der Kam

Dear Field Exchange, First my gratefulness goes to Professor Michael Golden and Yvonne Grellety for their detailed and scientific article based on the research outcome of...

FEX: Revised MSF nutrition guidelines III

By Saskia van der Kam and Sophie Baquet, MSF The summary below is based upon a near final draft of the new MSF guidelines.1 The guidelines may therefore undergo some revision...

FEX: Letter on MSF guidelines on using F75, Saskia van der Kam, Aranka Anema, Sophie Baquet and Marc Gastellu

Dear Editor, MSF would like to thank Schofield et al for their constructive criticism in the letter section of the previous edition of Field Exchange. We believe that...

en-net: Transitioning in inpatient care

I am currently conducting an inpatient care training and need some clarification on the session on transitioning in the feeding module. For children who completely refuse...

FEX: Home-Based Therapy With RUTF In Malawi

By Dr. Mark Manary and Heidi Sandige Dr. Mark Manary is an Associate Professor of Paediatrics at Washington University School of Medicine and Lecturer at Malawi School of...

en-net: RUTF

Are simplistic charts for calculation of RUTF ration required per day based on weight recommended by WHO?

Most of the RUTF sachets are packed in 92 gms can it be done...

en-net: Which quantity of infant formula for SAM <6m?

Following the 2013 WHO guidelines "Updates on the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children": " for infants with severe acute malnutrition but no oedema,...

en-net: 'homemade' F75 - supplement of folic acid?

A question regarding making ‘your own’ F75, treatment of SAM under five children. You use one of the available recipes (from WHO) and than you add CMV, should a...

FEX: New sachet/carton sizes for F75 and F100 therapeutic milks

Old versus new F100 sachets Substantial changes have been made to the sachet sizes for F-75 and F-100 therapeutic milk as well as to the carton sizes. Therapeutic milks F-75...

en-net: severely malnourished case unable to tolerate plumpu nut

A 1.5 years old severely manourished girl with Cerebral Palsy is unable to tolerate plumpy nut because of chewing and swallowing difficulties. Before she was admitted to the...

en-net: F-75, F-100 packaging

Dear users, what do you consider optimal packaging for F-75, F-100 in terms of size and if measuring scoop is needed or not.
Thank you.

The decision was made...

FEX: Response on F-75 and use of measuring scoops

By Mamane Zeilani, Nutriset Mamane Zeilani is Director for International Development and Nutritional Strategies at Nutriset, including product Research and Development Before...

en-net: What to do when ReSoMal and CMV not available?

We are having shortages and cannot find in-country sources for some our needed products. The shortage is expected to last until next year. In particular, I need to know how I...

FEX: Locally produced RUTF in a hospital setting in Uganda

By Tina Krumbein, Veronika Scherbaum, and Hans Konrad Biesalski Tina Krumbein is a graduate nutritionist. This article forms part of her diploma thesis submitted to the...

FEX: Updated Nutriset ‘red scoop’ instructions for mixing F75 and F100

Nutriset's F-75 and F-100 therapeutic milks come in sachets of, respectively, 410 g and 456 g. For both products, the full content of one sachet must be mixed with 2 litres of...

en-net: Use of half strength infant formula instead of F75 Formula

Hi All I am currently working as a Dietitian Advisor to the Samoan NHS. A current practice in the Paediatric ward for infants ranging from about 6 months to 2 years,...

en-net: THERAPEUTIC MILK - new sachet/carton sizes

Notification from UNICEF supplies (Jan Komrska) Substantial changes have been made to the sachet sizes for F-75 and F-100 therapeutic milk as well as to the carton...

FEX: Scaling up the treatment of acute childhood malnutrition in Niger

Milton Tectonidis By Isabelle Defourny, Emmanuel Drouhin, Mego Terzian, Mercedes Tatay, Johanne Sekkenes and Milton Tectonidis Emmanuel Drouhin is the Niger Desk Officer,...

en-net: Quantification and Supply Plan for Management of Acute Malnutrition Products

Do we have any tools for quantification and supply planning of Management of Acute Malnutrition products i.e RUTF, F-100, F-75, RESOMAL etc? I would be glad to check if there...

FEX: A pragmatic approach to treating severe malnutrition in emergencies: is F75 always beneficial?

By Saskia van der Kam Saskia is the headquarters nutritionist in MSF Holland. This article describes MSF's experience of implementing a therapeutic feeding programme for...

Close

Reference this page

Letter on revised MSF Nutrition Guidelines draft, by E.C. Schofield, Ann Ashworth, Mike Golden and Y. Grellety. Field Exchange 14, November 2001. p20. www.ennonline.net/fex/14/letters