Triggers, Early Warning and Response in FFP Assistance

Summary of research1

Villagers in Mali appraising Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP).

The Office of Food for Peace (FFP) FY 2008 Title II Assistance Proposal Guidelines (APGs) include the incorporation of 'early warning and response mechanisms (including trigger indicators)' into Title II-supported multi-year assistance programmes (MYAPs). Prior to 2006, in order to respond to an increase in food needs due to a shock, resources were often diverted from the development programme to the emergency response. While this approach did facilitate a rapid response to acute food needs, it ran the risk of potentially undermining advances being achieved by the development interventions. The FY 2008 Title II APGs aim to improve this approach by allowing the continuation of development interventions, with appropriate modifications to respond to changing circumstances, while adding emergency resources to the programme to respond to food needs over and above those that are being addressed by the adjusted development interventions.

A recent paper set out to review briefly cooperating sponsor experiences with operationalising trigger indicators2 and early warning and response systems to date, outline the key characteristics of early warning and response systems and trigger indicators within the MYAP context, and provide suggestions on how cooperating sponsors can operationalise the FFP guidance on trigger indicators. Cooperating sponsor experiences reviewed within a MYAP context were Africare, CARE, Catholic Relief Services, Food for the Hungry and World Vision. The main findings of this review include the following:

Trigger indicators differ from other monitoring and evaluation requirements for Title II MYAPs in several important ways. First, trigger indicators are strongly encouraged, but not mandatory for cooperating sponsors to include in MYAP proposals. Second, trigger indicators aim to enhance programme flexibility rather than monitor or evaluate programme impact, unlike most other reporting requirements. Third, trigger indicators are not standardised by FFP - the cooperating sponsor s have a great deal of flexibility to define trigger indicators. Finally, trigger indicator information is to be reported to FFP principally via ongoing dialogue with Missions, rather than via existing annual reporting requirements.

Many cooperating sponsor programmes will be developing trigger indicators in the absence of full food security early warning systems in their programme area. Cooperating sponsors should remember that the purpose of the trigger indicators is to identify when a shock may undermine food security sufficiently to warrant either adjustments in programming of Title 11 resources or additional emergency food resources.

Cooperating Sponsors that aim to operationalise the FFP guidance on trigger indicators should consider the following:

Recommendations to operationalise guidelines on trigger indicators

  1. FFP strongly encourages cooperating sponsors to include trigger indicators in the MYAP proposals, and where they are not included, the proposal should explain why these mechanisms are not necessary. Where cooperating sponsors decide to include trigger indicators in their MYAP proposals, the following guidance is given. The proposal should identify the shocks of greatest concern to food insecurity in the population concerned. Nutritional and dietary impact indicators are not in themselves sufficient as trigger indicators in a MYAP proposal. Cooperating sponsors that do not have a well-established early warning presence in a given country should start by taking stock of what is already being done in the country in early warning.
  2. The proposal should indicate the trigger thresholds or indicate how and when they will be established. The thresholds should be justified briefly, unless they are to be determined via the baseline or other research at the start up of the MYAP.
  3. The MYAP proposal should identify the strategies to be used to obtain the primary and/or secondary trigger indicator data. Proposals should describe how the trigger indicator information would be integrated into the agency's broader monitoring and evaluation.
  4. The proposal should briefly note plans for keeping the Mission and FFP up to date, including where evidence of a problem is seen, information on which populations may be affected and why, the potential severity and assumptions underlying the scenario.
  5. The proposal should briefly present a plan for how the cooperating sponsor will engage with national or sub-national early warning and disaster preparedness and response institutions and networks, at least at the level of information sharing.
  6. Cooperating sponsors should include plans for at least one situational and needs assessment to follow up where trigger indicator thresholds are reaching.

Show footnotes

1Mathys, E (2007). Trigger Indicators and Early Warning and Response Systems in Multi-Year Title II Assistance Programs. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, 2007.

2Indicator used to determine the threshold at which MYAPs need to shift activities and/or require additional resources for new activities in response to a slow-onset shock.

More like this

FEX: Trigger Indicators and Early Warning and Response Systems

USAID's Office of Food for Peace (FFP) and the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) Project have released 'Trigger Indicators and Early Warning and Response Systems...

en-net: Why prevalence using MUAC is not useful as trigger level for humaniterian response?

My question is specific to pastoral population. Rearches documents indicated that the prevalence of acute malnutrition using both WFH and MUAC gives similar estmate for...

FEX: Can the Nutrition Information System be ‘trusted’ to build on available data sources?

By Patrizia Fracassi Patrizia holds an M.Sc. in Development Management. Over the past two years, she has consulted in Ethiopia for UNICEF and the World Bank. She previously...

FEX: Institutional development in Ethiopia: supporting an improved emergency response

By Jean Gladwin Dr Jean Gladwin is an independent consultant and researcher. She was seconded from the World Food Programme as a technical adviser to the Ethiopian government...

FEX: Maintaining GOAL’s capacity to support surveillance in Ethiopia

By Zeine Muzeiyn and Ewnetu Yohannes Zeine Muzeiyn has been working in the area of Nutrition for the last seven years. Before he joined GOAL Ethiopia, he had been working in...

en-net: SAM Threshold for Emergency Response

Is there international consensus on the SAM threshold to trigger a response? I understand other contextual factors need also to be considered. Still on the same GAM prevalence...

FEX: Suggested New Design Framework for CMAM Programming

By Peter Hailey and Daniel Tewoldeberha Peter Hailey was a Regional Nutrition Specialist in the UNICEF East and Southern Africa Regional Office and is now Senior Nutrition...

FEX: Meeting demand peaks for CMAM in government health services in Kenya

By Regine Kopplow, Yacob Yishak, Gabrielle Appleford and Wendy Erasmus Regine Kopplow is a Global Nutrition Advisor with Concern Worldwide. She previously worked in various...

FEX: 2011 famine in South Somalia: the role of the early warning information System

By Abukar Yusuf Nur – Nutrition Analyst, Ahono Busili – Nutrition Team Manager, Elijah Odundo – Nutrition Data Analyst, Joseph Waweru – Nutrition Analyst, Louise Masese –...

FEX: Joint Emergency Operation Plan NGO response to emergency food needs in Ethiopia

By Alix Carter Alix Carter has worked in the humanitarian sector in Ethiopia for almost three years. She is currently working as the Humanitarian Accountability Advisor at...

en-net: Second Food Aid and Food Security Assessment (FAFSA-2) (2013)

This report is a comprehensive review of the U.S. Agency for International Development Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP) Title II development food aid program from FY 2003...

FEX: Somali Region Ethiopia

Summary of situation report Two consultants from UNICEF and WHO carried out an assessment of the emergency response in the Somali region of Ethiopia in August this year1. The...

FEX: The Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit of Ethiopia roles, responsibilities and achievements

By Isaack B. Manyama, Gugsa Abate and Mathewos Tamiru Isaack B. Manyama is ENCU Team Leader and Nutrition Cluster Coordinator for Ethiopia Gugsa Abate is Nutrition Specialist...

FEX: The Evolution of Ethiopian Government’s Early Warning System

Dr Kassahun Bedada Beyi Dr Kassahun Bedada Beyi is Early Warning and Response Case Team Coordinator with the Early Warning and Response Directorate. This is located within the...

FEX: Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) scale up: Lessons from Somalia operations

By Leo Anesu Matunga and Anne Bush Leo Matunga is currently the nutrition cluster coordinator for Somalia. He has over 12 years experience working in nutrition in emergencies...

FEX: Evaluation of Dafur Early Warning and Food Information System

North Dafur where SCUK operated until December 2004 Summary of evaluation1 Save the Children UK (SCUK) recently commissioned an evaluation of the Darfur Food Information...

en-net: FANTA Update: June 2013

FANTA UPDATE | June 2013 In this issue of the FANTA Update, we highlight some of the latest publications, events, and news from the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance...

FEX: Nutrition Surveillance in Somalia

By Noreen Prendiville Noreen Prendiville has been involved in health, nutrition and food security programmes in East Africa over the past fifteen years and has a special...

en-net: MUAC Cutoffs for Adults

As per the SMART recommendtions, the scale and severity of the nutritional situation is determined by nutritional status of under-five children and Mortality (CMR, U5MR)...

FEX: Contextual data collection in nutrition surveys in Ethiopia

Women carrying grass grown in the Awassa region of Ethiopia, which they sell in the market to get a small income. Summary of analysis1 The study described in this article was...

Close

Reference this page

Triggers, Early Warning and Response in FFP Assistance. Field Exchange 32, January 2008. p10. www.ennonline.net/fex/32/triggers