Micro-credit in refugee situations

Summary of published research1

Micro-credit and other types of loan programmes have not been widely attempted within refugee and internally displaced population (IDP) contexts largely due to the fact that repatriation, resettlement or further displacement may prevent repayment of loans. However, an increasing number of refugees and IDPs remain 'stuck' in protracted situations, creating potential for using credit-based interventions to support their livelihoods. A recent paper based on a compilation of best practices and lessons learned from the 'Alchemy Project'2 has been made available by the Feinstein International Centre.

The paper identifies the main problems affecting loan programmes in refugee situations as:

  1. The difficulties around repatriation, resettlement and onward migrations, which creates instability and problems with repayment.
  2. Isolated camps and restrictions on movement that create market access problems and transportation constraints.

The main lessons are:

Micro-credit is not for everyone

So called 'vulnerables' are seldom the most appropriate candidates for micro-credit and their presence in a programme can both undermine the programme and increase the client's vulnerability by exposing them to debt. Microcredit should be provided only to stable, economically active refugees who have demonstrated their own initiative in starting a business. Good candidates might also be refugees with prior micro-credit experience or experience with formal credit institutions like banks.

Bad practices by unqualified agencies trying to do micro-credit include:

There are often contradictions between the target group that a non-governmental organisation (NGO) is mandated to support in a refugee camp context, and whether that group can be supported with credit. Donors and UNHCR often require that assistance programmes are targeted at the most vulnerable in the refugee population.

The authors argue that livestock and in-kind loans should be used to support those not ready for micro-credit. Refugees who are not appropriate candidates can best be helped with traditional relief, or less onerous in-kind loans or small livestock programmes. In-kind loan programmes have less demanding repayment requirements, and can be more easily managed by a relief agency. Livestock and in-kind loans can support a variety of people, including new arrivals or so-called 'vulnerables' such as childheaded households and the disabled.

The provision of small stocks (goats, sheep, chickens, ducks, etc) either for breeding or trading purposes can help launch livelihoods and are good starter programmes. Successful completion of an in-kind loan programme can prepare the client for participation in a microcredit programme.

In refugee settings it is best to be conservative about using micro-credit and to wait until the agency is familiar with the displaced community, and is working productively with relief organisations, groups and leaders.

Good programme design

Before designing and implementing a credit programme, NGOs should conduct a market study, identifying market constraints and possibilities for clients as well as risk. Good loan appraisal or well designed group loan methodology will prevent problems arising from repossession, and is a first step in identifying clients who might eventually be unable to make repayments. In refugee situations, various loan conditions, including legal documentation and collateral are missing or compromised. But this need not necessarily prevent the loan, if appropriate alternatives can be identified. It might be possible to waive documentation requirements once the implementing agency is familiar with the community and has the cooperation of key members and leaders who can help detect loan risks. Alternative forms of collateral can be identified. For example, where refugees have access to farmland, collateral can take the form of vegetables produced by the refugees that are assessed for their market value.

In certain situations, refugees may lack any form of collateral and other ways to ensure repayment, such as group pressure, are absent. Under these circumstances, some agencies have provided micro-credit using controversial repayment strategies. These include working with the government so that refugees who did not repay their loans were not permitted to renew their documents.

Given the existence of a grant mentality amongst many refugee populations, it is best not to associate micro-credit programmes with UNHCR or relief organisations that have traditionally handed out grants. Furthermore, micro-credit programmes should never be attempted by untrained relief agencies. The skills and mindset needed to manage and administer micro-credit programmes are rarely found in traditional relief programmes.

Loan size, interest rates and repayment frequency

Loan size should be appropriate for the client's enterprise. For refugees it is important that loan amounts are appropriately sized to meet the special marketing needs of refugees which may include transport and marketing costs. These should be based on institutional cost assessment, inflation, market rates, risk and client capacity. Interest is the way in which a programme is made sustainable by creating additional income beyond repayments that cover administrative costs. In Islamic areas, where interest cannot be charged, service charges on the loan can be imposed instead. Interest rates can be problematic amongst poor refugees. Some experts have suggested that since refugee programmes are not meant to be sustainable, charging nominal interest can be a way to create a good credit culture.

Provision of a mix of services

For refugees with no in-country business experience, marketing assistance can help businesses. Refugees often cannot access markets and cash economies either because they live in isolated and remote border areas, or because the government's policy requires refugees to stay in camps or restricts freedom of movement.

Training of individuals, loan groups and loan committees before loan disbursement is highly valued by group members, and increases the success of programmes. The existence of organised groups in the community is an asset in loan programmes, as these create strong pressures to repay, groups can combine funds to finance larger businesses and groups are self-monitoring. Group loan schemes only work in environments of trust. Group lending is inappropriate if clients are unwilling or unable to take responsibility for each other's debts. In many refugee and urban contexts, there is a lack of trust and it may be preferable to work with individuals, and put in place other safeguards to reduce the risk of absconding and non-payment. In some camps, traditional rotating credit schemes familiar from the home country are re-started by the refugees themselves. It is best to work with existing groups.

Resettlement and repatriation

All parties involved with the refugees, including the host government, refugee leaders, resettlement organisations and UNHCR, must build an understanding about how repatriation or resettlement will be managed in the loan programme. When UNHCR initiates voluntary repatriation or resettlement, agencies can plan repayment schedules accordingly. It might be necessary to make loan periods shorter to reduce repatriation risk in general. Loan cycles should be shorter than in non-refugee situations.

Credit programmes and refugee livelihoods are supported when governments allow refugees to work outside of camps, and disabled when there are government restrictions on refugee movement. In some cases, governments impose different requirements and restrictions on different refugee nationalities. The biggest challenge remains for NGOs and UNHCR to advocate on behalf of economic freedom for refugees and the protection of their rights to pursue a livelihood as set out in the 1951 Refugee Convention.

The economic contribution of refugee entrepreneurs can be a potential win-win situation for both host countries and refugee communities. Their economic contribution can be maximised by agencies advocating for their rights to work and freedom of movement.

Show footnotes

1Jacobsen. K (2004). Micro-credit and other loan programmes in protracted refugee situations: Lessons from the Alchemy Project. Feinstein International Centre. http://nutrition.tufts.edu/

2The Alchemy Project is an experimental project aimed at supporting displaced people's livelihoods by providing access to a variety of forms of credit.

More like this

FEX: Lessons From a Microfinance Pilot Project in Rwanda

By Tamsin Wilson Tamsin Wilson is an independent microfinance consultant. She coordinated Concern Worldwide's qualitative research on microfinance in Angola, Mozambique,...

FEX: Letter on microfinance project in Rwanda, by Elisabeth Nyffenegger

Dear Editor I would like to comment on the article in the November issue of Field Exchange, concerning the microfinance project in Rwanda. Those involved in such projects...

FEX: Income and employment support (Special Supplement 3)

5.1 Introduction The provision of cash as an emergency response has the potential to impact on all elements of the livelihoods framework by providing the means to protect or...

FEX: Micro-finance as livelihood support in urban Argentina (Special Supplement 3)

By Claudio Freda, Marcela Gonzalez and Marta Valdez, ACF Spain (ACF-E) The December 2001 Argentinean crisis highlighted the serious social and economic problems faced by the...

FEX: REACH OUT food assistance in Uganda

By Peter Paul Igu, Reach Out and Mary Corbett, ENN Peter Paul Igu has been a full-time volunteer with the organisation, Reach Out, since Jan 2002, and is the food programme...

FEX: Microfinance institutions and a coastal community’s disaster risk reduction, response, and recovery process in Bangladesh

Summary of published research1 A mother and child in Gopalgan, Bangladesh Location: Bangladesh What we know already: Microfinance programmes generate income opportunities...

FEX: Global survey of the implementation of UNHCR’s Policy on Refugee Protection and Solutions in Urban Areas

Summary of review1 The advent of the 2009 Urban Refugee Policy (see Box 1) definitively changed UNHCR’s approach to working with urban refugees and established clear...

FEX: Use of cash in the tsunami response

As part of its Cash Learning Project, the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) is undertaking research into the use of cash in the...

FEX: Market-led Livelihood Recovery and Enhancement Programme and integrating ENAs

By Andrew Simons, Daniel Gebeyehu, Getachew Gemtesa and Markos Kidane Andrew Simons is the National Programme Director for Food for the Hungry (FH) Ethiopia. He holds an...

FEX: British Red Cross urban learning scoping study

Summary of report1 The British Red Cross has undertaken a scoping study to better understand the challenges posed by humanitarian action in urban areas, and how the Red Cross...

FEX: Feasibility of private micro flood insurance provision in Bangladesh

Summary of research1 Women head for a nearby flood shelter established by the government in Bangladesh A recent paper describes a study to test the viability of a flood...

FEX: Joint WFP/UNHCR evaluation of Kenyan refugee programme

Summary of report1 In September 1999, WFP and UNHCR conducted a joint evaluation of their assistance (Protracted Relief Operation (PRO)) to Somali and Sudanese refugees living...

FEX: Lessons learnt from the 1998 Bangladesh floods

This article is based on research conducted by Dr. Moazzem Hossain who was working as a Programme Manager in Health and Nutrition of Save the Children Fund UK at the time of...

FEX: Issue 35 Editorial

In this issue of Field Exchange, there are two themes which previous editorials have not addressed - sustainability of interventions and how markets can create, as well as be...

FEX: An overview of REST’s implementation of the Productive Safety Net Programme

By The Relief Society of Tigray (REST) Mekelle Team The Relief Society of Tigray (REST) has been in existence in Ethiopia for over 30 years, starting out as a relatively small...

FEX: Income generation in Guinea Conakry (Special Supplement 3)

By Alexandros Yiannopoulos, ACF Spain (ACF-E) Since the 1990s, Liberia, Sierra Leone and later on the Ivory Coast, have been embroiled in conflict. This has led to a mass...

FEX: Value chain approach to increase production of RUTF/CSB

By Yuki Isogai Yuki Isogai is Operations Officer for the Ethiopia Nutrition Project/Private Sector Development Specialist with the World Bank. She has a wide range of...

FEX: Oxfam evaluation of Cyclone Sidr response

Summary of evaluation1 A boy stands next to his makeshift home in Patarghata (Barguna District). Late in the evening of 15th November 2007, Cyclone Sidr struck Bangladesh's...

FEX: Summary of the Oxfam Review of Bangladesh flood response

Food Distribution in Bangladesh '98 Between July and October last year Bangladesh suffered severe flooding regarded as the worst in living memory: two-thirds of Bangladesh was...

FEX: Impact of Food Delays on Refugees

Author: Lina Payne - Food Researcher Resettlement programme, N. Uganda, Oxfam Between 1995 and 1997, Ikafe and Imvepi settlements in Arua District, North Uganda,...

Close

Reference this page

Micro-credit in refugee situations. Field Exchange 35, March 2009. p11. www.ennonline.net/fex/35/micro