Menu ENN Search

An investment framework for nutrition: Reaching the global targets for stunting, anaemia, breastfeeding and wasting

Summary of research*

Location: Global

What we know: Child malnutrition has lifelong consequences for heath, human capital, economic development, prosperity and equity. Global nutrition targets (2012) focus on stunting, anaemia, low birthweight, childhood overweight, breastfeeding and wasting; the cost of achieving this is unknown.

What this article adds: A recent comprehensive analysis by the World Bank estimates an additional investment of $70 billion (£62 billion approx) over ten years is needed to achieve global targets for stunting, anaemia in women, exclusive breastfeeding and scaled-up treatment of severe wasting. This would avert 3.7 million child deaths; every dollar invested would yield between $4 and $35 in economic returns. Investment in a subset of priority interventions would cost $23 billion (£19 billion approx); global targets would not be reached, but 2.2 million lives would be saved. Achieving global goals is feasible but concerted efforts in financing, scale-up and sustained commitment are needed. Research priorities include scalable strategies for delivering high-impact interventions, how to improve the technical efficiency of nutrition spending, and costs and impacts of nutrition-sensitive interventions.

 

In 2015, 159 million children under the age of five were chronically malnourished or stunted, underscoring a massive global health and economic development challenge (UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank 2015). In 2012, in an effort to rally the international community around improving nutrition, the 176 members of the World Health Assembly endorsed the first-ever global nutrition targets, focusing on six areas: stunting, anaemia, low birthweight, childhood overweight, breastfeeding and wasting. Some of the targets (stunting and wasting) are further enshrined within the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2), which commits to ending malnutrition in all its forms by 2030.

Nutrition targets: Investment case and constraints

Ending malnutrition is critical for economic and human development. Childhood stunting has lifelong consequences not just for health, but also for human capital and economic development, prosperity and equity. Reductions in stunting may increase overall economic productivity. Nutrition interventions are consistently identified as one of the most cost-effective development actions. However, although the investment case for nutrition is strong, factors limiting achievement of nutrition SDG targets include insufficient financing, complexity of implementation, difficulty determining the methods and costs involved in monitoring SDG targets, and the resources required for scale-up. There is little evidence on the estimated costs of achieving the global nutrition targets, including the SDG targets. No previous study has systematically linked the costs with the potential for impact and the interventions’ returns on investment, nor assessed the financing shortfall between what is required and global spend. Finally, no prior study has presented a comprehensive global analysis of domestic financing from governments and official development assistance.

This report aims to close these knowledge gaps by providing a more comprehensive estimate of costs as well as financing needs, linking them both to expected impacts, and laying out a potential financing framework. An in-depth understanding of current nutrition investments, future needs and their impacts, and ways to mobilise the required funds, are included.  

Estimated financing needs

An additional investment of $70 billion (£62 billion approx) over ten years is needed to achieve the global targets for stunting, anaemia in women, exclusive breastfeeding and scaled-up treatment of severe wasting. The expected impact of this increased investment is the prevention of 65 million cases of stunting and 265 million cases of anaemia in women in 2025, as compared with the 2015 baseline. In addition, at least 91 million more children under five years of age would be treated for severe wasting and 105 million additional babies would be exclusively breastfed during the first six months of life over 10 years. Such investment would also result in at least 3.7 million child deaths being averted. Every dollar invested in this package of interventions would yield between $4 and $35 in economic returns.

In an environment of constrained resources, prioritisation of a subset of interventions is necessary – scaling-up of interventions with the highest returns, that are scalable now, with the strong caveat that global targets would not be reached. Costing $23 billion (£19 billion approx) over next 10 years, when combined with other health and poverty reduction efforts, an estimated 2.2 million lives would be saved and there would be 50 million fewer cases of stunting in 2025 than in 2015.

A mix of domestic on-budget allocations from national governments, oversees development aid (ODA), newly emerging innovative financing mechanisms and household contributions could finance the remaining gap. A society-wide effort is needed for financing the achievement of the nutrition targets; this mix of financing is also in line with other SDG challenges. Not only do investments in nutrition make one of the best value-for-money development actions, they also lay the groundwork for the success of investments in other sectors.

Recent country experiences suggest that meeting global nutrition targets are feasible, although some, especially those for reducing stunting in children and anaemia in women, are ambitious and will require concerted efforts in financing, scale-up and sustained commitment. On the other hand, the target for exclusive breastfeeding has scope to be much more ambitious.

Priority research areas include:  

Research on scalable strategies for delivering high-impact interventions, including how to address bottlenecks to scaling-up.

The assessment of allocative efficiency, i.e. identifying the optimum funding allocation among different interventions or an allocation that maximises the impact under a specific budget constraint.

Research to improve the technical efficiency of nutrition spending, including identifying new strategies for addressing complex nutritional problems such as stunting and anaemia, as well as technologies to help take these solutions to scale more rapidly and at lower cost.

Strengthening the quality of surveillance data, unit cost data for interventions in different country contexts, and building stronger data collection systems for estimating current investments in nutrition (from both domestic governments and ODA). Further research is needed on the costs of interventions and significant resources will be required to build a living database of current investments, including closely monitoring spending and ensuring accountability, and to undertake national-level public expenditure reviews.

Research on which interventions prevent wasting is urgently needed. It is also essential to learn more about cost-effective strategies for managing moderate acute malnutrition, and whether or not these can contribute toward the prevention of wasting.

Costs and impacts of nutrition-sensitive interventions; i.e. interventions that improve nutrition through agriculture, social protection and water and sanitation sectors, among others. It is evident that stunting and anaemia have multiple causes and can be improved through increasing quality, diversity and affordability of foods; increasing the control of income by women farmers; and reducing exposure to faecal pathogens by improved water, sanitation, and hygiene practices. However, the attributable fraction of the burden that can be addressed by these interventions is unknown.

The authors end with a call to action. Investments in the critical 1,000-day window of early childhood will pay lifelong dividends, not only for the children directly affected but also for us all in the form of more robust societies that will drive future economies.

References

UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization and World Bank). 2015. Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates: Levels and Trends. Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition. www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/ estimates2014/en/ (accessed October 2015).

Read more...

*Shekar, Meera; Kakietek, Jakub Jan; Dayton, Julia M.; Walters, Dylan David. 2016. An investment framework for nutrition: reaching the global targets for stunting, anemia, breastfeeding and wasting: executive summary. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/847811475174059972/executive-summary

 

More like this

FEX: Financing the sustainable scale-up of CMAM in high-burden countries

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Investment in the scale-up of community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) is needed to reduce global...

FEX: Global Nutrition Report

This Global Nutrition Report (GNR) is the first in an annual series. It tracks worldwide progress in improving nutrition status, identifies bottlenecks to change, highlights...

FEX: Accelerating the scale-up of treatment for severe acute malnutrition

News By Saul Guerrero, Erin Boyd, Claire Harbron, Diane Holland, Abi Perry and Sophie Whitney Saul Guerrero is the Director of Nutrition at Action Against Hunger UK (ACF UK)....

NEX: Maternal and Child Nutrition (MCN)

Special Issue: Promoting Healthy Growth and Preventing Childhood Stunting, September 2013 (Volume 9, Issue Supplement S2 Pages 1-149) Promoting healthy growth and preventing...

FEX: Children’s Investment Fund Foundation

Name: Children’s Investment Fund Foundation Annual income (expenditure) (2011): $73 million (estimated) for year ended 31 August 2012 Website: www.ciff.org CEO: Jamie...

FEX: Nutrition in emergencies: Do we know what works?

Summary of paper1 Location: Global What we know: Nutrition action in emergencies is well accepted and attracts significant resources. There is a lack of evidence on what are...

FEX: Why invest and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Global breastfeeding rates remain far below international targets, commitment to breastfeeding in terms of policy and...

FEX: No Wasted Lives: Accelerating action for children with acute malnutrition

By Saul Guerrero, Nancy Aburto, Erin Body, Diane Holland, Guy Holloway, Abigail Perry and Sophie Whitney Saul Guerrero is the Director of International Nutrition Initiatives...

FEX: Nutrition funding: The missing piece of the puzzle

News Summary of report* A recent report by Generation Nutrition, a coalition of 85 civil society organisations, describes both why funding matters to nutrition and the...

FEX: Research priorities on the relationship between wasting and stunting

Summary of research* Location: Global. What we know: There is global momentum to bring down levels of undernutrition. Wasting and stunting frequently co-exist, but are often...

FEX: Editorial

This rather large issue of Field Exchange has a typically wide range of material from field practitioners and researchers. Some examples of innovative practice include an...

Resource: Research Priorities on the Relationship between Wasting and Stunting

Background Wasting and stunting are global public health problems that frequently co-exist. However, they are usually separated in terms of policy, guidance, programming and...

FEX: Call for strategic US approach to the global food crisis

Summary of report1 US Government vessel offloading in the port of Djibouti 42,000 MT of donated food aid in Ethiopia in 2002. The food will reach Ethiopia after a three day...

FEX: Protecting policy space for public health nutrition

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: There is growing consensus that strong government regulation of food, beverage and tobacco sectors is needed to protect...

NEX: 2014 Global Nutrition Report: Actions and Accountability to Accelerate the World’s Progress on Nutrition

The Global Nutrition Report (GNR) has produced high quality nutrition profiles of all countries. To download the report for your country, and read the GNR in full, go to...

FEX: Global Hunger Index Report

The 2014 Global Hunger Index (GHI) report - the ninth in an annual series - presents a multidimensional measure of national, regional, and global hunger in the shape of the...

FEX: From the editor

Successful homestead gardening in Satkhira, Bangladesh The year 2013 promises to be an important year for the nutrition aid community and those whom it serves. Since...

FEX: Management of SAM in the Philippines: from emergency-focused modelling to national policy and government scale-up

Aashima Garg, Anthony Calibo, Rene Galera, Andrew Bucu, Rosalia Paje and Willibald Zeck Aashima Garg is Nutrition Specialist based in UNICEF New York. At the time of writing,...

FEX: Growth faltering in rural Gambian children after four decades of interventions: a retrospective cohort study

Summary of Research1 Nabwera HM, Fulford AJ, Moore SE and Prentice AM. (2017). Growth faltering in rural Gambian children after four decades of interventions: a retrospective...

NEX: Power of Nutrition: new independent fund for nutrition

The Power of Nutrition is a newly launched independent fund targeting $1 billion of new private and public sector financing to tackle child undernutrition in some of the...

Close

Reference this page

Shekar, Meera; Kakietek, Jakub Jan; Dayton, Julia M.; Walters, Dylan David (2016). An investment framework for nutrition: Reaching the global targets for stunting, anaemia, breastfeeding and wasting. Field Exchange 53, November 2016. p40. www.ennonline.net/fex/53/reachingglobaltargets