Menu ENN Search

Evaluation of the Wajir Relief Programme 1996-98

Published Evaluation

OXFAM (UK and Ireland) were engaged in relief work in Wajir District of Kenya from September 1996 until October 1998. The interventions were a response to the droughts of 1996/7 and the El Niño floods of 1998. OXFAM published the findings of an external evaluation1 of their response in April 1999. This evaluation drew on the experiences of their staff, other agency and government staff and on the views of beneficiaries.

Wajir district is populated by a largely pastoralist population. Successive droughts had led to depletion of livestock herds and increasing destitution. Available data on child malnutrition demonstrated a severe crisis. OXFAM responded by organising one of the largest relief operations ever mounted in Wajir District. Over the two year period OXFAM spent £4,612,029 on relief components. It delivered over 21,000 tons of maize 16,000 tonnes of beans and 500 tonnes of oil.

Although the programme was continuous, it can be broken down into two distinct phases:

  1. The response to the drought starting with a three month drought mitigation project in the south and parts of the west extending to the whole district except a 15 km radius around Wajir town (where the Kenyan government were providing relief) and winding down by October 1997;
  2. The response to the El Niño floods with a relief programme from December 1997 to August 1998 which became a recovery programme ending in October 1998.

Overall the evaluation demonstrated the timeliness and high quality of the relief response delivered by OXFAM to the rural population of Wajir during the drought and floods of 1996-8. However, there were problems:

  1. there was a tendency to plan and submit proposals for only 3 months. This appears to have been due to a reluctance by DfID to commit to longer term food purchase as their preferred option was to encourage WFP to provide relief food;
  2. the planning phase consistently underestimated the number of beneficiaries eligible for relief food. As a result the ration had to be cut and the food shared more thinly.

Main findings of the evaluation

OXFAM used a system of relief food distribution whereby the district was divided into five livelihood zones, each with a different recovery package. This approach was appropriate and worked well.

OXFAM registered women as beneficiaries of relief resources. Although more management intensive than other distribution approaches, it was a price worth paying for a more efficient and equitable means of distribution.

The relief food became a critical component of the diet and the dramatic fall in malnutrition rates during 1997 over a period of about five months was probably due to the combined results of the relief operation and of good rains in April/May 1997.

The food distribution also stabilised food prices helping pastoralist purchasing power. This benefit was especially critical for Wajir town which was less well served by the relief operations due to smaller distributions of maize by the GoK. This presented a dilemma for OXFAM as many of the poorest and most vulnerable lived in the town but it would not have been appropriate to shoulder the governments responsibility and replace their relief operations with an NGO one.

The coverage of 90% of households reported in July 1997 was exceptional and the operation was consistently rated by beneficiaries as one of the most successful the district had experienced. The impact of the floods was sudden and extreme. During the first few months of 1998 when the road network was severely disrupted, the food distribution was life-saving. OXFAM supplemented the meagre government relief ration in Wajir town with Unimix and high energy biscuits.

As Wajir district began to recover from drought and flood OXFAM altered their approach and instigated a series of recovery interventions to assist vulnerable households as food relief was withdrawn. A financial analysis of the four types of intervention demonstrated the costs and benefits associated with each. It cost Ksh 525 to deliver one ration of food relief. In order to provide similar benefits, i.e. the equivalent of one monthly ration, restocking with goats cost Ksh 712, restocking with oxen Ksh 480 and cash for work Ksh 450.

The cash for work scheme made the most impact, allowing households to clear their debts, buy essential items and invest in small-scale income generating activities.

Restocking interventions also provided benefits to recipients but sheep and goats did not achieve the levels of production anticipated. The result was that this became an expensive means of transferring assets to poor households. Restocking with oxen and provision of seeds would have made a significant impact if the short rains of 1998 had not failed.

The on-going development programme undoubtedly suffered from the legacy of the largescale relief programme. It dramatically changed the perception of OXFAM in the district, which now tends to be seen as a 'free hand out resource rich' relief agency. OXFAM's ability to turn the image around and re-establish itself as a development agency will depend partly on the time lag before another emergency operation.

OXFAM exploited its comparative advantage as an international NGO with strong field based operations by identifying and responding early to localised food stress and mobilising fast as the emergency developed and changed. However, the success of its response was highly dependent on funding provided by one bilateral donor -DfID. The lengthy procedures that WFP must follow to launch an appeal and deliver food to Kenya meant that the first WFP deliveries to Wajir arrived 9 months after OXFAM had started the relief operation and four months after the GoKs emergency declaration.

Show footnotes

1Buchanan-Smith. M and Barton.D (1999); Evaluation of the Wajir Relief Programme (1996-98). Oxfam, Oxford OX2 7DZ, England.

More like this

FEX: Linking relief and development programming in Wajir, Kenya (Special Supplement 3)

In the early to mid-1990s, Oxfam developed a one programme approach that combined relief, development and advocacy. The Wajir programme, which is described below, is considered...

FEX: Issues and challenges for livelihoods programming in emergencies (Special Supplement 3)

8.1 Introduction The previous sections of this supplement have highlighted various challenges in livelihood support programming in emergencies. Most of these are within the...

FEX: Postscript to 'Outbreak of micronutrient deficiency disease'. By Emma Naylor, Oxfam GB

Response to SCF Wajir Article By Emma Naylor, humanitarian programme coordinator, Oxfam GB Kenya Programme Oxfam Great Britain has been working in Kenya since the 1960s, and...

FEX: De-stocking in Kenya (Special Supplement 3)

Animals sharing a drink in Wajir, northern Kenya The drought in 1999-2001 was one of the most severe in recent history in Kenya. Nearly three million pastoralists and...

FEX: Cash interventions as an alternative to food aid

Proposed Research At Dili port, unloading of WFP-supplied rice which will be distributed at six different collection points in town. Workers from humanitarian agencies will...

FEX: Outbreak of micronutrient deficiency disease: did we respond appropriately?

By Dianne Stevens, Patricia Araru and Buwa Dragudi, Save the Children (UK) Dianne Stevens is a nutritionist with a Masters in Public Health and Tropical Medicine. She has been...

FEX: Supplementary Feeding in Mandera: The Right Intervention?

View of the Mandera Camp Lourdes-Vazquez-Garcia worked for MSF Spain in the Mandera feeding centres during the period covered by this article. She subsequently qualified with...

FEX: References for Special Supplement 3

Beatrice, a beneficiary of the CRS seed voucher scheme in Burundi 1. Abdulai A., Barret, C., Hoddinott, J. (2004, June). Does food aid really have disincentive effects? new...

FEX: The impact of cattle eradication in Northern Botswana

Summary of published paper* "The combined effect of drought and cattle eradication in Ngami East resulted in a two to threefold increase in total malnutrition rate" Poor crop...

FEX: Taking the politics out of resource allocation: the Kenya experience

By Jeremy Shoham Jeremy Shoham is co-director of the ENN and editor of Field Exchange. Over the past two years he has been working periodically as a consultant for the...

FEX: Support for primary production (Special Supplement 3)

7.1 Introduction This section focuses on supporting agricultural production, in particular farming and livestock production, as livelihood strategies. Production support can...

FEX: Livestock and livelihoods in emergencies

Lessons learned during the 1999 - 2000 emergency response in Kenya Summary of report* "The provision of veterinary drugs, such as de-wormers, prolongs the life of an animal...

FEX: Integrated Approach to Supporting Chronically Ill in Malawi

Interview by Mary Corbett with Mrs Nellie Nyang'wa, Oxfam For the past three years, Nellie Nyang'wa has been the Country Programme Manager for Oxfam in Malawi. Her previous...

FEX: Linking early warning system information to response

The emergency livestock off-take programme, Isiolo district 1996-7 By Helen Bushell and Mike Wekesa Isiolo - A trader admires the animals he has purchased Helen Bushell is a...

FEX: Profile and overview of the church’s role in emergency response

By Deed Jaldessa and Debela Kenea Deed Jaldessa has over two decades experience in development work in rural Ethiopia and currently leads The Ethiopian Evangelical Church...

FEX: References for Special Supplement 1

Women selling food in South Sudan AbuSaleh A, 1993. Cost effectiveness of feeding programs in Hartisheik A camp, for Somali refugees, Ethiopia 1988-1989. Unpublished report...

FEX: Nutrition causal analysis: planning and credible advocacy

By Paul Rees-Thomas Based primarily in Eastern Europe and the Horn of Africa, Paul Rees- Thomas worked for five years with Action Contre Le Faim (ACF), latterly in the food...

FEX: Evaluation of the Supplementary Feeding Programme carried out in Marsabit District, Kenya, April-November 1997

Vincent Brown (Epicentre), Sylvia Carbonell (Médecins Sans Frontières) MSF implemented a nutrition rehabilitation programme in Marsabit District between April...

FEX: Joint WFP/UNHCR evaluation of Kenyan refugee programme

Summary of report1 In September 1999, WFP and UNHCR conducted a joint evaluation of their assistance (Protracted Relief Operation (PRO)) to Somali and Sudanese refugees living...

FEX: Chronic Malnutrition: a Problem not Addressed by SFPs

An Appeal for a Development Programme by MSF Spain in Mandera District, Kenya The chronic nutritional emergency in Central Mandera, north east Kenya, was the subject of an...


Reference this page

Evaluation of the Wajir Relief Programme 1996-98. Field Exchange 10, July 2000. p13.



Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.