Resourcing Targeting (Special Supplement 1)
Agencies deciding to implement food aid targeting in emergencies often face constraints on targeting design. Three such factors are dealt with here:
- Quantity and quality of food typically available for emergency food aid targeting
- Overall quantity of resources available to respond to a particular emergency
- Quantity of resources required to put in place an effective targeting system (i.e. the costs over and above the food costs)
These three factors heavily influence the feasibility of the design of any targeting system.
The quantity and quality of food required
Typically, a 'general ration' in a poor developing country is made up of cereals, sometimes pulses, less often oil and very occasionally, salt and other items. Calculations of food aid needed for households are usually based on an average population nutrient requirement which includes the additional needs of pregnant and lactating women. Even recommended rations fall short in some aspects of dietary quality (see Box 21). Ration planning should, therefore, also include recognition of any special food commodities required to meet the needs of physiologically vulnerable groups in the community, such as the people living with HIV/AIDS, the sick or elderly.
However, in spite of requirements and recommended rations the size and composition of the ration available to be given to emergency affected people varies widely, largely according to the availability of specific commodities. In some locations, the ration falls far short of requirements while in others, e.g. the Balkans, more elaborate rations have been distributed and elsewhere, e.g. Iraq, rations given with the wider objective of income support may include non-food items, such as soap and detergent. General rations are often inadequate, in either quantity or quality, to meet the needs of all individuals. This makes a case for targeting subgroups of the population who have elevated requirements for nutrients (see Section 1).
Box 21: Average population nutritional requirements and ration recommendations
Example of UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP and WHO recommended food rations for populations fully dependent on food aid (UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, WHO, 2002). The example ration used in the table below does not meet the population requirement for Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) or Vitamin C. Analysis of the other example rations show similar results.
|Nutrient||Energy||Protein||Fat||Calcium||Iron||VIT. A (Retinol)||B1||B2||B3||VIT. C|
|Average population require-
|2100 kcal||53g||40g||450 mg||22 mg||1650 IU||1 mg||1 mg||12 mg||28 mg|
|% of require-
ments met by standard ration
Targeting under conditions where the food available is less than needs
Situations where the quantity of food aid available is much less than the assessed survival need, i.e. where there is no possibility of providing aid to meet household needs, however these are defined, have regularly occurred. In this situation, there are two choices, either to give everyone a tiny share, or target the available resources at a particular group facing the greatest risk. The decision will depend on the context and also the future estimate of availability of resources. For example, in an acute emergency and before the food pipeline has been established and more discriminating systems organised, an agency may decide to do a blanket food distribution for all children aged under five years. This will provide a meagre household ration and may help to protect those most vulnerable to malnutrition, i.e. under fives. The commodity selected may be chosen with children's consumption in mind, e.g. a blended food, or blended food pre-mixed with sugar and oil, in the hope that this will strengthen the targeting by making it difficult to include this in the general household diet.
In the medium term, the management of a situation where there is a gross shortfall in the amount of resources available presents difficulties. Assuming that, a) a population has no alternative lines of action open to them, e.g. migration, b) the food available, even if equally distributed in proportion to need, is insufficient to ensure long term survival, and c) it is not anticipated that the shortage will be quickly relieved e.g. by a harvest, the outcome must inevitably be the death of some proportion of the population.
In designing a system to deal with this situation, a reasonable aim is to ensure the survival of the maximum proportion of the population for the longest period. A logical approach is to provide a ration to the population at greatest risk of death, sufficient to ensure recovery to a level which will reduce that risk, e.g. to provide food only to children 80% of the median weight for height and other age groups, to the extent that risk can be assessed, until they have recovered to the point where risk has been reduced (Seaman & Rivers, 1988).
In practice, the systems which have been used broadly follow this logic, but in many cases, modify the eligibility criteria to include carers and other siblings. For example, in the Karamoja, Uganda famine in 1980/81 where there were gross food shortages affecting all age groups, a chain of centres was developed, located to maximise coverage. These were designed around a compound with shade and a single guarded entrance/ exit. The admission criteria were anthropometric and/or clinical, and any individual meeting the criteria would be admitted to receive a full cooked ration to be eaten 'on the spot'.
In Korem, Ethiopia, SC UK employed similar criteria to admit children to a large feeding centre where, again, a full ration was supplied, in this case also including carers and sometimes siblings. The most malnourished adults, from the many thousands living in the open without food, were clinically selected by MSF for admission to a relief shed.
Imposed targeting criteria and distribution methods, particularly when food aid is in short supply, can be intrinsically undignified and sometimes actively humiliating to the recipient (see Box 10). Protecting the dignity of disaster affected populations is an important human rights principle. Every effort should be made to ensure that to the extent possible, communities are consulted on the approach used and play a role in the design of the targeting system, and humanitarian agencies take action to secure further resources for the affected population where humanitarian assistance falls far short of need.
The time and expertise required to conduct community managed targeting effectively has been well documented and should not be underestimated. Where the time demands on the Relief Committee are excessive, consideration needs to be given to some form of compensation (Shoham, 1999). Once the distribution is up and running, there may be a reduced cost to the external agency as the community takes responsibility and any field presence is limited to a monitoring or supervisory role. The length of time which an agency has been in a particular area, as well as a range of other factors, will affect the amount of time required to start community managed targeting.. For example, in 2001 in Binga, Zimbabwe, Save the Children aimed to reach a total of 51,000 beneficiaries, in approximately 120 villages, with food aid targeted in the community (see also Table 4). If conducted according to the steps outlined in box 14, it would have taken 14 weeks to complete the preparatory work, employing 6 field officers (see Box 22). The original intention was to distribute in weeks 5-8 and 9-12 and yet the entire process, if completed, would have taken 14 weeks. In the end, it was decided to omit stage 5 (see Box 22) and thereby, start distribution in week 10. Targeting food aid, using the methods described in Sections 2-5 for reaching households, are likely to fail in these circumstances. While it may not be possible to avoid the approaches outlined in these sections, high levels of inclusion and exclusion can be expected.
- Box 16 describes the system of relief committees set up in southern Sudan with a strong representation by women. In 1998, there was an extreme crisis with very high mortality. The targeting system described was abandoned by the community and every distribution was subject to redistribution. The main justification given for switching was the deterioration of the situation and "the fact that the Chiefs are solely accountable and responsible for hunger related deaths amongst their communities". In addition, a tax was imposed on the distribution system to support "government authorities" (Chapman 1998b).
- In north east Amhara region, Ethiopia, in 1999, food aid provision (through free food distribution and the employment generation scheme) was insufficient to prevent widespread hunger and elevated rates of malnutrition. In woredas where the needs were greatest, local authorities redistributed the food aid to 100% of households because food aid allocations were perceived to be insufficient relative to local needs and everyone was considered affected by the crisis. In reality, the variation at local level in the actual targeting was substantial.
|Table 5: Community reported problems with targeting in Turkana, 1996|
|Division within the household||Y||Y|
|Accusations of nepotism||Y|
|Theft during distribution||Y|
|Disturbance during distribution by non-beneficiaries||Y|
Community based targeting in Binga, Zimbabwe
In addition to errors, there may be other consequences of pursuing these strategies in times of acute shortage, i.e. social division and conflict. In 1996, Oxfam undertook a targeted food distribution in Turkana district in Kenya. Under pressure to limit the extent of the food distribution, the community was asked to identify only the "worst cases" (estimated by the local famine early warning system to be approximately 30% of the population). An unexpected time lag between the time of the assessment and the first distribution meant that the situation had deteriorated and, at the time of the distributions, the community felt that many more people should have been eligible for assistance. In fact, they were having to choose between the destitute. Table 5 below shows the problems highlighted by Oxfam when the programme was evaluated according to each distribution centre. Oxfam notes that it was remarkable that the community agreed to actually apply the targeting criteria given to them by Oxfam, and that this was probably due to the long and well-established relationship that the agency had with the affected community.
Cost of targeting
It is generally assumed that targeting systems which require higher degrees of accuracy require greater resources (see Table 6). However, the evidence for this is limited. Each type of targeting system carries different types of budgetary costs and human resource requirements. Some carry costs for the implementing agency, some carry costs for the community.
Children may be a group targeted to receive food, when needs exceed what food aid is available
The costs of a particular targeting system should also be considered in relation to the extent to which objectives have been effectively achieved. The cost effectiveness of general distribution, in comparison to targeted supplementary feeding, was reviewed in Hartisheik A camp in Ethiopia for Somali refugees, 1988-1989 (AbuSaleh, 1993). The results showed that a dry supplementary feeding programme, targeted to moderately malnourished children under five, and a general ration averted malnutrition at a cost of $US221 per case. If, rather than delivering separate supplementary feeding services, the general ration was improved in quality (rather than quantity) to include the increased nutrients available in the supplementary ration, the cost fell to US$118 per case averted. The study also examined the cost effectiveness of wet supplementary feeding, both in the context of a small general ration and a large general ration. The analysis found the cost per case of malnutrition treated was US$437 per case in the first situation, and $56.7 in the second situation. The authors concluded that a high quality general ration was significantly more cost effective in preventing malnutrition than a small general ration coupled with wet feeding.
|Table 6: Summary of key targeting costs|
|Type of targeting||Costs|
|Centre based feeding & family ration||Staff costs in centres Cost for community in terms of time: frequent visits, prolonged stays at centres|
|Community based feeding||Time required to set up system Logistics costs to maintain decentralised care|
|Community based, general ration||Considerable time required setting up the system (see below) Ongoing and considerable time commitment required from Relief Committee|
|Administrative targeting, general ration||High cost in data collection and analysis to determine feasible eligibility criteria and registering beneficiaries|
|Food for work||Considerable budgetary costs in addition to the food aid to manage the work programme (e.g. tools, administration etc)|
|Market intervention||Budgetary costs of market manipulation (e.g. subsidies, storage, etc)|
Box 22: Time table of preparatory work for community based targeting in Binga, Zimbabwe
More like this
Food may be distributed in many different ways but the method of distribution will, to a large extent, depend on the eligible groups and the method for identifying them....
In the past, little emphasis has been placed on monitoring what happens to food aid after it has reached the distribution point. Donor reporting has been limited to the...
By Evelyn Depoortere, Epicentre Evelyn Depoortere is currently a medical epidemiologist for Epicentre. Previously she worked on several MSF missions, including Southern Sudan...
Children are often a group targeted in emergencies Eligibility criteria, i.e. the characteristics of those individuals or households to be targeted with food, arise from the...
Fasher-Kabkabiya and Kutum-Fasher, Dafur Summary of evaluation1 The World Food Programme (WFP) recently published an evaluation of their general food distribution programme...
By Sophie Baquet and Michelle van Herp Sophie Baquet is the headquarter nutritionist in MSF Belgium and Michel van Herp, Headquarters epidemiologist in MSF Belgium. This...
By Anna Taylor SCF-UK Update on the current situation The last edition of Field Exchange included an account of discussions on how food aid should be targeted in the siege...
Glossary ACF Action Contre la Faim BMI Body Mass Index CMT Community Managed Targeting CSB Corn Soya Blend DFID Department for International Development FFW Food...
Report summary : The Institute of Medicine In 1995 the Senate Appropriations Committee Report directed USAID to initiate a pilot programme to increase the vitamin C content of...
The authors of this article are Fiona Watson and Aida Filipovitch. Both authors were nutrition Consultants working in B&H for WHO between 1993-6. This article describes the...
WFP/Alejandro Chicheri, Nicaragua, 2007 Summary of review1 A recent review focuses on the potential role of lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS)' in meeting the nutritional...
The author of this article is Zhara Mirghani with assistance from Rita Bhatia. Rita is the senior nutritionist in the Professional and Technical Support Services of UNHCR....
By Hanna Mattinen and Loreto Palmaera Hanna Mattinen has been Food Aid Advisor at the ACF headquarters since 2005, with a focus on food assistance and cash-based...
By André Briend Andre Briend is a medical doctor, working for the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), a French public research institution with a mandate to...
By Ruco Van Der Merwe Ruco Van der Merwe is currently based in Nairobi, Kenya as a Food Assistance Adviser with Samaritan's Purse International Relief (SP). He has been on...
by Jeremy Shoham X marks the spot for the food air-drops in South Sudan (WFP 1998, F. Pagetti) The recent spate of reports and articles on targeting emergency food aid shows...
By Lola Goselow This article is based on a field trip made by Lola Gostelow (SCF HQ emergency advisor) to the SCF programme in Huambo province, Angola in November 1999. The...
4.1 Introduction A WFP ship carrying food aid docks in Indonesia Food aid remains the over-riding response to emergencies, regularly constituting over half of consolidated...
It is being recognised more and more that we need to improve the ways in which we measure and document emergency programme efficiency. In particular we need to include an...
Summary of published1 and unpublished research By Beatrice Lorge Rogers (Principal Investigator), Patrick Webb (Principal Investigator), Jocelyn Boiteau (Project...
Reference this page
Anna Taylor and John Seaman (2004). Resourcing Targeting (Special Supplement 1). Supplement 1: Targeting food aid in emergencies, July 2004. p26. www.ennonline.net/fex/101/chapter6