Introduction (Special Supplement 2)
|ACF||Action Contre la Faim|
|CHA||Community Health Assistant|
|CHAM||Christian Health Association of Malawi|
|CNW||Community Nutrition Worker|
|CTC||Community Therapeutic Care|
|DFID||Department for International Development|
|DHO||District Health Officer|
|DPPB||Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Bureau|
|DPPC||Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Committee|
|EGS||Employment Generation Scheme|
|EPI||Expanded Programme for Immunisation|
|FGD||Focus Group Discussion|
|GMP||Growth Monitoring Programme|
|HBC||Home Based Care|
|HBT||Home Based Treatment|
|HSA||Health Surveillance Assistant|
|MAM||Moderate Acute Malnutrition|
|MoHP||Ministry of Health and Population|
|MSF||Medecine Sans Frontiere|
|MUAC||Mid Upper Arm Circumference|
|NRU||Nutrition Rehabilitation Unit|
|OTP||Outpatient Therapeutic Programme|
|PLWHA||People Living With HIV/AIDS|
|PPS||Population Proportional Sampling|
|RUTF||Ready to Use Therapeutic Food|
|SAM||Severe Acute Malnutrition|
|SFP||Supplementary Feeding Programme|
|TBA||Traditional Birth Attendant|
|TFP||Therapeutic Feeding Programme|
|WFP||World Food Programme|
|WHO||World Health Organisation|
We would like to say a special thanks to Concern Worldwide whose brave decision to back the CTC idea with core funding, field site for testing and general support and advice from the beginning made the programme possible and was a central feature contributing to the success of the programme.
Although Nicky Dent, Ann Walsh and Paul-Rees-Thomas are not authors in this supplement they were crucial in supporting and implementing these programmes.
Development Cooperation Ireland (DCI), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Food and Nutritional Technical Assistance (FANTA) project, Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), World Health Organisation (WHO) and Torchbox Ltd all funded the CTC research and development programme. Concern Worldwide, Save the Children UK,Tear Fund, Care, Save the Children US and the International Medical Corps have worked with Valid to implement CTC projects.
This publication was made possible through the support provided by Development Cooperation Ireland (DCI) and by the U.S. Agency for International Development through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) project. The opinions expressed herein are those of Valid and the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.
1.1 Scope of the supplement
Trading in markets is a vital livelhood activity for many families in Ethiopia.
This supplement presents a collection of articles written by people who have been involved in Community-based Therapeutic Care (CTC) programmes. The contributions come from Valid International's CTC research and development team, operational agencies implementing CTC programmes, independent practitioners and academics involved in the research and development of CTC. There has been substantial accumulated experience of CTC over the past four years (see Table 1). Many of these programmes have included specialised research inputs from anthropologists, food technologists, health systems specialists, ethicists, economists, statisticians, epidemiologists and sociologists providing a wide range of evidence-based perspectives on CTC.
|Table 1 CTC projects and approximate numbers of severe acute malnourished (SAM) and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) treated|
|Country||Year||Agency||Ongoing or completed||No. SAM treated (OTP + SC)||No. MAM treated (SFP)|
|Ethiopia - Wolayita||2000||Oxfam||Completed||1185||-|
|Ethiopia - Hadiya||2000||Concern||Completed||170||3000|
|N Sudan - Darfur||2001||SCUK||Completed||806||25633|
|N Sudan - Darfur||2002||SCUK||Completed||446||6019|
|Malawi - Dowa||2002||Concern||Ongoing||1900||7564|
|Ethiopia - South Wollo||2003||Concern||Ongoing||794||11573|
|Ethiopia - Wolayita||2003||Concern||Completed||194||3346|
|Ethiopia - Wolayita||2003||Concern||Ongoing||445||4359|
|Ethiopia - Sidama||2003||SCUS||Ongoing||1232||3571|
|Ethiopia - Hararge (Golo Oda)||2003||SCUK||Completed||232||2332|
|South Sudan - BEG||2003||Concern||Completed||610||3844|
|South Sudan - BEG||2003||Tearfund||Completed||696||5433|
|Ethiopia - Hararge||2004||Care US||Ongoing||280||-|
The supplement aims to provide a broad range of opinions and experiences of CTC to inform a wide audience about the CTC model of intervention and its relationship with other humanitarian interventions. In presenting these perspectives, we hope to define clearly what CTC is and how it works, clarify CTC's relationship to Centre-based Therapeutic Feeding, and clarify the differences between CTC and other more recent models of Home-based Treatment. The supplement aims to share some of the difficulties and lessons we have learnt during the process of developing the CTC approach and also presents some of the initial monitoring data collected from CTC programmes.
OTP sites are accessed by boat and motorbike in South Sudan
This supplement is organised into sections based on field experiences relating to CTC. Section 2 describes CTC approach. Section 3.1-3.4 describes four country programme experiences of CTC, while sections 4.1- 4.5 deal with technical and management issues of CTC including articles from NGOs starting up CTC programmes and a discussion of cost issues. Finally sections 5.1- 5.4 use case studies to address issues around cultural, horizontal (accross programmes), institutional and temporal integration. CTC was initially adapted for emergency interventions, thus most of the articles in this supplement describe experiences and the lessons learnt in emergency settings. More recent work has focussed on adapting the approach to the longer-term problems of food insecurity and malnutrition related to HIV/AIDS. The articles on the 'demand drive model', CTC and HIV, CTC in Malawi and integrating CTC with local people, infrastructure and agriculture explore the issues arising from these 'newer' forms of CTC.
1.2 Changing the way we manage acute malnutrition
Foreword by Steve Collins
The development of the CTC model of care has aroused considerable controversy and professional disagreement. These tensions may be viewed as manifestations of the classical debate between clinical healthcare and public health provision. Up until the start of the CTC programme, the predominant influence behind therapeutic feeding was clinical, with important developments achieved by clinicians, clinical nutritionists or pathophysiologists. The focus was on understanding the disease process in malnutrition, and on researching and developing effective, curative, clinical regimes (1;2). Progress was spectacular. In the past 15 years, new treatment regimes, in particular using F75 and F100, implemented through TFCs, have had major impacts in reducing case fatality rates and improving recovery for severely malnourished individuals (3). By contrast, there has been little improvement in the population level impacts and every year, acute food insecurity and famine still kills thousands of children and adults (4). The CTC approach is rooted in public health principles and has focused on the sociological, epidemiological and food technology aspects of interventions. It provides a framework that better harnesses the interventions that we already have, to achieve impact at the population level (5).
Without effective, individual level interventions, public health measures cannot be successful. The clinical and medical advances, and more recently, the development of solid F100 (RUTF), have been essential stepping stones towards developing the CTC approach. However, the optimal strategies to address SAM require that clinical knowledge and curative regimes be fitted into a broader public health framework. This requires balancing individual medical issues with broader concerns, such as coverage, cost, uptake, compliance and impact. The reality is that many TFC programmes fail to deliver large scale public health impact due, in large measure, to poor coverage (6).
The first formulation of CTC started in 1998 during the famine in South Sudan. In particular, during an extensive evaluation of the MSF Holland's selective feeding programmes in Bahr El Gazal, it became clear that the current centre-based model of care could not deliver impact and instead, placed the population at additional risk. Despite their professional approach, MSF-H's programmes had failed to deliver. In such an extreme situation as South Sudan during 1998, the only way to achieve substantial impact was to focus on ensuring that those who were treatable with simple, quality supplementary feeding were admitted to and remained in programmes. In other words, to prioritise coverage of the masses of acutely malnourished over inpatient care.
Children waiting to measured in Ethiopia.
While most people find the idea of programmatic triage - whereby programmes are tailored to prioritise coverage even at the expense of those at the point of death- distasteful, the reality is that in the majority of scenarios where humanitarian agencies intervene, resources and capacity are insufficient to provide the state of the art inpatient care to all of those who require it. Programmes that do not take the resource and capacity realities of nutrition crises into account not only achieve sub-optimal impact, but also risk making a situation worse. TFCs and NRUs are high risk environments; the patients are immuno-suppressed and often infected; the conditions are cramped, and water and sanitation are often difficult. In these conditions, water, hygiene, sanitation, medical and nutritional protocols must be scrupulously adhered to, if cross infection is to be avoided. Although this might be possible for the large INGOs implementing TFCs, the vast majorities of TFCs are implemented by smaller, less experienced NGOs or local hospitals and in these, standards are often not met. The result is high levels of morbidity within units, as well as low coverage of the population outside of units. There are many examples of this: Somalia in 1992 (7) where congregation of populations and epidemics of measles and shigella decimated the populations, Liberia in 1996 (8), S Sudan in 1998 (9) and Ethiopia in 2000.
Prioritising interventions according to public health and developmental principles, rather than prioritising individual cure rates, will require a reanalysis and rethink and a commitment to change at all levels within organisations engaged in therapeutic feeding. This will take time as TFCs are large scale interventions, employing large numbers of NGO workers and absorbing large amounts of donor funding. They are well adapted to the volunteer model of humanitarianism that flourished in the 1990s. There are generic models of implementation as encapsulated in many of the INGO nutritional guidelines. This all makes TFC implementation relatively independent of culture and a well run TFC in Somalia appears very similar to a well run TFC in Angola. This means that with good health training, even first time volunteers can implement TFCs relatively effectively, if they have access to one of the high quality manuals that agencies such as MSF and ACF have produced. By contrast, CTC implementation must be highly tailored to the context in which it operates; it is more dependent on local staff, and relies much more fundamentally on community participation and the local infrastructure. The success of CTC requires culturally specific negotiation and facilitation with local communities and local structures. Such negotiation requires compromise and understanding on the part of the whole team and consequently, is not really suitable work for inexperienced volunteers, however enthusiastic and no matter what manual they have.
In conclusion, it is hoped that this supplement will allow the readers to see CTC in context, as building upon and complementary to TFC care and the clinical management of acute malnutrition, while at the same time, a shift away from the individual focus towards a public health approach.
More like this
by Steve Collins (Valid International) 2.1 Main principles of CTC Community Therapeutic Care (CTC) is a community-based model for delivering care to malnourished people. CTC...
by Rose Caldwell & Alistair Hallam (Valid International) The aim of this paper is to present the cost per beneficiary of CTC and discuss aspects of these costs, underlying...
By Hedwig Deconinck (SC-US Ethiopia) Save the Children USA (SC-US) implemented an emergency health and nutrition programme in Sidama zone of SNNP region of Ethiopia, in...
4.1 CTC from Scratch - Tear Fund in South Sudan By Ed Walker (Tearfund) Beneficiaries collecting their general ration in South Sudan. Tearfund has been working in Northern...
FEX: Cost effectiveness of community-based and inpatient therapeutic feeding programmes to treat SAM in Ethiopia
Health Extension Worker testing the appetite of a malnourished child, Menkere health post, Tigray region By Asayehegn Tekeste, Kebede Deribe, Dr Mekitie Wondafrash and Dr...
By Ed Walker (Tearfund) Beneficiaries collecting their general ration in South Sudan. Tearfund has been working in Northern Bahr el Ghazal, southern Sudan, in the nutrition...
One nutrition worker's solution to childcare at a busy feeding distribution! A three day meeting was held in Dublin hosted by Concern and Valid International between 8-10th of...
FEX: CTC in South Sudan - A Comparison of Agency Approaches and the Dilemmas Involved (Special Supplement 2)
Tanya Khara (Valid International), Jennifer Martin (Concern Worldwide), Ed Walker (Tearfund) Introduction In 2003 both Concern Worldwide and Tearfund asked Valid...
Severely malnourished child with father Commentary by Dr. Steve Collins Dr. Steve Collins is a medical doctor with a doctorate in nutrition during emergency operations. He is...
3.1 CTC in Ethiopia- Working from CTC Principles Isolated village in the highlands of South Wollo, Ethiopia. By Kate Golden (Concern Ethiopia) and Tanya Khara (Valid...
By Adrienne Daudet and Carlos Navarro-Colorado Morlaï, cured at home, at last weekly visit. Adrienne Daudet is an agronomist and has an MA in anthropology. She has four years...
Summary of report1 A mother attends the CTC programme A recent published paper describes Save the Children US's (SC US) experience of setting up a community therapeutic care...
By Emily Mates (Concern Ethiopia) Therapeutic Feeding Centres (TFCs) are often highly effective in treating individual cases of severe malnutrition. Their exacting...
By Kate Sadler Kate Sadler undertook her MSc in Public Health and Nutrition at LSHTM. She has spent over 3 years working for Concern Worldwide in Burundi, Rwanda and...
By Kirsti Lattu, MSF Programme Officer and Caroline Grobler-Tanner, Independent Nutrition Advisor Examining an infant in the TFC. Maradi, Niger In 2005, Médecins Sans...
By Kate Sadler & Tanya Khara (Valid International), Alem Abay (Concern Malawi) In February 2002, the Malawi government declared a national nutritional emergency and the UN...
Between 3-7 March, 2003 the annual United Nations SCN (Standing Committee on Nutrition) conference was held in Chennai, India. Key achievements and plans to emerge from the...
The annual UN ACC/SCN meeting was held in Nairobi, Kenya between 2-5 April 2001. The Working Group on nutrition in Emergencies meeting was held on the 5th. Highlights of the...
Dear Editor, Routine prescription of antibiotics to all TFC admissions regardless of clinical presentation (as recommended by WHO protocol ) seems rather extreme. What are...
By Josephine Querubin, ACF-USA Josephine Querubin is a medical doctor who has been working in humanitarian work for the past 12 years. Beginning in her home country, the...
Reference this page
Tanya Khara and Steve Collins (2004). Introduction (Special Supplement 2). Supplement 2: Community-based Therapeutic Care (CTC), November 2004. p4. www.ennonline.net/fex/102/introduction