Menu ENN Search

ALNAP Annual Review 2002

The ALNAP Annual Review 20021 provides a synthesis of the principal findings and recommendations of evaluations of humanitarian action, completed and made available to ALNAP in 2000-2001. Encompassing 46 evaluations and 9 syntheses, it identifies crosscutting issues and trends and the learning and accountability challenges for those within the humanitarian sector, whether practitioner, policymaker or evaluator. The synthesis also highlights the humanitarian sectors repeated failure to learn and implement lessons from past experience.

The central theme of the review is learning within the humanitarian system, including mapping of current learning mechanisms, an analysis of their strengths and weaknesses, and key constraints to learning. It also reviews learning mechanisms from other sectors that might be adopted or adapted to meet the specific characteristics and learning needs of the humanitarian sector. The quality of individual evaluations is assessed using the 'ALNAP Quality Proforma'. This highlights the strengths and weaknesses of current practice from conception and design, through the evaluation process, to the dissemination of findings and implementation of recommendations.

One of the main sectors evaluated was food aid and emergency agriculture (19% of the reports). In general this sector met the short-term objective of 'feeding mouths', and successes were usually qualified. Problematic areas identified were ration levels and inadequate attention to disadvantaged groups, such as women and children. Water and sanitation, and health interventions were also successful in meeting their short-term objectives. Shelter, and in particular housing, was the least successful sectoral emergency intervention.

In general, the evaluation reports tell of a job well done, however a number of generic weaknesses within the humanitarian system are described by the review. Overall, the quality of evaluation reports was unsatisfactory. In particular, evaluation reports were poor at explaining why interventions were successes or failures. Other problematic areas included failure to integrate short-term emergency objectives with longer-term plans, poor co-ordination, limited exploration of building on indigenous coping strategies and the need to improve monitoring.

Some keys to success were identified, including dedicated staff, good needs assessment, and the ability of international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to work with well-established partners. Dedicated staff were identified as central to the success of humanitarian action. However they were often hindered by agency institutional systems typically fraught with poor communication, ineffective staff capacity building and inadequate training.

A number of examples of good learning practice were highlighted in the review, such as the development of common networks and sources of learning, e.g. Reliefweb, Humanitarian Practice Network and ALNAP. However, while the evaluation mechanism is well established in the humanitarian sector, weakness lies in a failure to distinguish between learning and accountability approaches to evaluation. For example, external, independent evaluations (which may be undertaken primarily for accountability purposes) are often not considered conducive to learning at individual and team levels, while outside criticism is often handled defensively rather than constructively.

Several constraints to learning in the humanitarian sector were identified, in particular lack of clarity as to intervention objectives and desired outcomes, and poorly defined responsibilities and relationships between individuals, teams and organisations. In addition, high rates of staff turnover create a severe obstacle to learning and knowledge transfer, while mechanisms for cross-organisational learning are poorly developed. Short-term funding, pressure to maintain low overheads and competitive behaviour amongst organisations vying for profile and fund access, were considered the major barriers to effective learning by, and within, the sector.

Possible areas for action identified in the review include:

Within organisations

Across sector

Copies of the ALNAP Annual Review 2002, Humanitarian Action: Improving Performance through Improved Learning can be ordered from the ALNAP Secretariat, ODI, 111 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7JD or at £15 per copy (£12 to ALNAP members).

Show footnotes

1Active Learning Network on Accountability and Performance (ALNAP). Established in 1997, ?is an international, interagency forum working to improve learning, accountability and quality across the humanitarian sector. Details of ongoing ALNAP activities, new developments and publications can be found on ALNAP's website http:\\

More like this

FEX: ALNAP: facilitating lessons learned

The Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Assistance (ALNAP) was established in 1997 as an international interagency forum working to...

FEX: Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action

Agency Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP) Website Address ALNAP Secretariat, ODI, 111 Westminster Bridge...

FEX: Aid responses to Afghanistan: lessons from previous evaluations

Summary of report1 A review of over 50 formal evaluation reports was conducted by a Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Working party on Aid Evaluation (Organisation for...

FEX: ALNAP review of humanitarian system

Summary of published report1 A recently published report, commissioned under ALNAPs2 Humanitarian Performance Project, set out to chart the performance and progress of the...

FEX: Peer review of WFP evaluation process

Summary of report1 A mother waits for WFP food aid distribution with her child in Malawi A recently commissioned peer review of the evaluation process and function within the...

FEX: From the Editor

A key thematic focus of this issue of Field Exchange is Humanitarian Reform. There have been many reviews and evaluations concerning the level of progress made since the reform...

FEX: A Review of the advances and challenges in nutrition in conflicts and crises over the last 20 years

Abbreviated version of unpublished paper Food distribution at the ICRC kitchen in Tonj. By Frances Mason and Anna Taylor This paper is a shortened version of the complete...

FEX: Programme evaluations: where do you start to learn?

The Active Learning Network for accountability and performance in the Humanitarian Sector (ALNAP) is currently developing training modules on Evaluation of Humanitarian Action....

FEX: Urban Humanitarian Response Portal

ALNAP and UN-Habitat have recently launched an Urban Humanitarian Response Portal - a knowledge sharing platform, with a focus on disaster preparedness, relief and early...

en-net: Hiring: Emergency Response Personnel (ERP) – Nutrition Adviser, Save the Children UK

JOB TITLE : Emergency Response Personnel (ERP) – Nutrition Adviser TEAM/PROGRAMME : Humanitarian Department GRADE: 3 POST TYPE:...

FEX: Accountability to affected populations: Somalia Nutrition Cluster experiences

By Samson Desie and Meftuh Omer Ismail View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Samson Desie is a nutrition specialist currently working as...

en-net: Nutrition Technical Advisor – Syria Response

Save the Children is looking for a Nutrition Technical Advisor for our Syria Response.

SCI currently has nutrition interventions in South and...

FEX: The state of the humanitarian system

Summary of report1 A recent report by ALNAP presents a system-level mapping and analysis of the performance of international humanitarian assistance between 2009 and 2011...

FEX: Evaluation of international response to the tsunami

Summary of report1 Devastation in Sri Lanka post tsunami The Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami killed over 227,000 people with 1.7 million displaced. A massive...

FEX: Nutrition security emergency programming in diverse urban contexts

By Marie Sardier, Joanna Friedman, Maureen Gallagher and Julien Jacob Marie Sardier is Food Security and Livelihoods Advisor with Action contre la Faim (ACF) in Paris...

FEX: Partnership and accountability in the South Sudan Nutrition Cluster (2015-2017)

By Isaack Biseko Manyama View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Isaack Manyama is the Nutrition Cluster Coordinator for South Sudan. He has 24...

en-net: Save the Children urgently seek Nutrition Adviser for Yemen

We are looking for: A NUTRITION ADVISER

Country: YEMEN - Sana'a (roving)

Length of contract: 12 months


FEX: Management of acute malnutrition programme review and evaluation

Summary of evaluation1 Young girl recovering from severe malnutrition, OTP centre in Kaedi, Mauritania By Yvonne Grellety, Hélène Schwartz and David Rizzi Yvonne Grellety is...

FEX: Robust evidence for an evidence-based approach to humanitarian action

Research By Mike Clarke, Jeroen Jansen and Claire Allen Mike Clarke is one of the founders of Evidence Aid and is now voluntary Research Director and Chair of the Board of...

FEX: Measuring the Impact of Humanitarian Aid

Summary of published paper1 A recent HPG Briefing Paper reports on research into how the humanitarian community measures and analyses the impact of humanitarian assistance....


Reference this page

ALNAP Annual Review 2002. Field Exchange 18, March 2003. p12.



Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.