Review of indicators to assess Infant Feeding in Emergencies
Summary of research1
Population movements in an emergency challenge needs assessments - including infant and young child feeding practices © ANDY SEAL
The public health importance of infant feeding in emergencies has been highlighted in countries such as Iraq and Bosnia where feeding infants with breastmilk substitute is common practice. Although there are few epidemiological studies on the impact of emergencies on infant feeding, many anecdotal reports of adverse health outcomes exist. The displacement of such populations has created new dilemmas for aid workers on how best to assess and support feeding practice.
During the 1999 Kosovo Crisis an opportunity arose to research humanitarian interventions in infant feeding in the Former Yugoslav Republic (FYR) of Macedonia.
Above and below: standard feeding indicators do not adequately assess artificial feeding practices of a population. Refugee camp, FYR Macedonia, 1999
Indicators, recommended by international health and nutrition organisations for assessing infant feeding practice, were compiled and analysed to evaluate their consistency and applicability for use in surveys of emergency-affected populations. These included measures of breast-feeding status, use of artificial feeding, anthropometric status and morbidity. In addition, health and nutrition status surveys performed on the resident or refugee population of Kosovo during the years 1996-1999 were reviewed to compare their use of infant feeding and morbidity indicators.
Comparison of standard indicators
Indicators recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) Indicators for Global Reporting, Wellstart International Expanded Programme on Breastfeeding (EPB) and Measure Demographic Health Surveys (DHS) were compared. This revealed a number of inconsistencies, both in target population and measurement method.
- The recommended age-group in which exclusive breastfeeding rate was measured varied between less than four months (WHO, UNICEF), and less than six months (EPB, DHS), thus limiting comparability of data.
- The standard indicator for timely complementary feeding, recommended by both WHO and UNICEF, refers to breastfed infants only. Thus in a population where a proportion of the infants are solely artificially fed, they would be excluded from this assessment.
- There is currently no specific definition of diarrhoea for infants under six months. The WHO standard definition of acute watery diarrhoea (three or more loose stools in 24 hours) closely resembles the minimum number of stools normal for an effectively breastfed infant (three or more stools in 24 hours).2 This greatly limits the interpretation of morbidity data in young infants.
- Timely initiation of breastfeeding is not included as a MICS global indicator and definition varies between DHS and WHO, and Wellstarts EPB.
Use of indicators during Kosovo crisis
The use of recommended indicators during the Kosovo crisis was inconsistent, with many nonstandard indicators and methodologies used instead.
For example, a large inter-agency nutrition and health survey, carried out in seven refugee camps in FYR Macedonia in 1999, included no standard indicators on infant feeding, while an infant feeding and weaning survey of the returned population in Kosovo included only one recommended infant feeding indicator. Seven of the reviewed surveys measured exclusive and predominant breastfeeding rates, however only two actually used the 24 hour recall method as recommended by the WHO.
Age-groups for which feeding and morbidity data were gathered also varied widely and infants under six months were often not included in anthropometric or feeding practice assessments. In some cases, feeding practice of young infants was inferred from data gathered from older infants and young children.
These limitations did not prevent comparison, interpretation or conclusion on infant feeding practice in survey reports. Conclusions appeared to be based on field perceptions and experiences rather than on actual data collected.
The authors suggest that the inconsistencies observed may reflect a lack of awareness by personnel of current recommendations. The widespread use of non-standard indicators may also reflect gaps in the scope of current assessment tools in emerging emergency situations. Although many standard infant feeding indicators have been developed and are widely used in non-emergency settings (e.g. UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative), in reality they have not yet been operationalised in the context of emergencies. Also, current indicators have been developed particularly to assess breastfeeding practice but few recommend how to assess the extent and nature of artificial feeding in a population. The use of a number of non-standard indicators in Kosovo may have reflected a need to assess artificial feeding practice, for which standard indicators do not exist.
Although the benefits of appropriate infant feeding in terms of child survival are well known, the evaluation of aid impact in terms of morbidity and mortality may not be practical or feasible in emergencies. Impact indicators, such as morbidity and anthropometry, have particular constraints when applied to young infants. Furthermore, there may be many indirect influences on infant and child feeding practice in an emergency situation. Monitoring of the entire aid process is necessary to evaluate impact, assign responsibility and encourage accountability. In particular, there is a need to broaden the field concept and practice of evaluation to include process indicators (e.g. number of mothers enrolled in a breastfeeding programme) and outcome indicators (e.g. breastfeeding rates) of infant and child feeding practice.
The authors conclude that during the Kosovo crisis, an inconsistent approach to assessment and monitoring prevented conclusions being drawn about the effectiveness of the international response in protecting infant health and nutrition.
Suggestions to improve future monitoring are made, including:
- Recommended outcome indicators and sampling strategies for assessing infant and child feeding practice should be developed and included in emergency field manuals for health, nutrition, logistics and donor personnel.
- The scope of existing standard indicators is not sufficiently comprehensive to address all feeding issues in emergency situations, particularly in relation to artificially fed populations. Further development and field testing of standard indicators for this population group is necessary if appropriate and comparable assessments are to be made.
- Ultimately, the presence of experienced key personnel in the field is essential to implementing international recommendations and guidelines. This requires significant improvements in field technical support and, where resources permit, early field positioning of an infant and child feeding co-ordinator in emergencies.
1McGrath M, Seal A, Taylor A (2002). Infant feeding indicators for use in emergencies: an analysis of current recommendations and practice. Public Health Nutrition: 5(3), 365-372
2Evidence-Based Guidelines for Breastfeeding Management during the First Fourteen Days, International Lactation Consultant Management (ILCA), 1999
More like this
FEX: Infant Feeding in Emergencies: Recurring Challenges
Published Report By Marie McGrath The importance of infant feeding in emergencies has been highlighted during recent emergencies in countries such as Iraq and Bosnia, where...
FEX: Infant Feeding Practices: Observations from Macedonia and Kosovo
As a result of concerns expressed about the usage of infant formula and a need for more information regarding weaning practices during and after the conflict in Kosovo, Action...
FEX: Postscript to 'Infant feeding in the South Asia earthquake aftermath'
Maaike's observations concur with many of our experiences around infant feeding in emergencies (IFE) in previous humanitarian interventions. Failure to include breastfeeding...
Resource: Indicators: Infant feeding indicators for use in emergencies: an analysis of current recommendations and practice
Public Health Nutrition 2002, 5(3), 365-372 Assessment of applicability and use of infant nutrition and health indicators used during emergencies. Compilation of indicators...
FEX: Kosovo Evaluation
During 1998 and early 1999 the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbian) forces increased their efforts to 'ethnically cleanse' Kosovo. They justified this on the basis that...
FEX: The reality of research in emergencies
Marie McGrath is a qualified paediatric dietician/nutritionist. She has an abundance of experience in emergencies, working previously with Merlin. SCF (UK) employed her to...
FEX: Safe infant feeding remains a challenge: the Balkans experience
Summary of published paper1 A recent article published in Disasters shows how the widespread failure of humanitarian agencies operating in the Balkan crisis to act in...
FEX: Issue 34 Editorial
Issue 34 of Field Exchange has a special focus on infant and young child feeding in emergencies (IFE) and is dedicated to the memory of Tom Marchione. Leading the IFE 'show'...
FEX: Livelihood assessment approaches in emergencies
A paper and recently summarised editorial1,2 Violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes have been previously reported in Field Exchange3. A...
FEX: The MAMI Project – Key findings and recommendations
Summary of report1 Child malnutrition is a major global public health issue. The burden of acute malnutrition in children 6 months to 5 years is well recognised, and the...
FEX: Debate on the Management of Severe Malnutrition
by Marie McGrath, Fiona O'Reilly and Jeremy Shoham (ENN). Over the past six months, ENN has been a party to debate regarding technical aspects of the management of severe...
Resource: Breastfeeding: Toolkit for Monitoring and Evaluating Breastfeeding Practices & Programs
Part of Wellstart International Expanded Promotion of Breastfeeding Program (EPB) The purpose of this Tool Kit is to provide program managers with practical methods to...
FEX: Increased diarrhoea following infant formula distribution in 2006 earthquake response in Indonesia: evidence and actions
By Fitsum Assefa, Sri Sukotjo (Ninik), Anna Winoto and David Hipgrave Fitsum Assefa is a nutritionist with over 15 years experience working on public nutrition in various...
FEX: Challenges in protecting non-breastfed infants in the Rohingya response in Bangladesh
View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Alice Burrell is a public health nutritionist with five years of experience working in the nutrition...
Resource: Indicators: Infant and Child Feeding Indicators Measurement Guide (old)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The IYCF indicators are in the process of being updated - see: Indicators for Assessing IYCF Practices. Conclusions of a Concensus meeting 6-8 November, 2007,...
FEX: Infant feeding support at scale in the Haiti 2010 response
Summary of published experience1 Location: Haiti What we know: Sub-optimal breastfeeding practices increase risk of infant morbidity, malnutrition and death. Emergencies...
NEW: Visit the IYCF-E HUB established in May 2021 for a global, comprehensive and interactive repository of essential IYCF-E resources! For a list of key IYCF-E resources and...
FEX: Don’t let them eat cake
By Susanne Jaspars Susane Jaspers is a Nutritionist specialising in emergency nutrition, food aid and food security. This article is based on her experiences in Albania and...
en-net: Infant & Young Child Feeding in Emergency Consultant
The purpose of the consultancy is to follow-up and implement all the recommendations from the assessment report, with special emphasis on the rapid establishment of baby...
en-net: Infant Feeding Qualitative Research consultant needed for UNICEF Somalia
Purpose of Consultancy Optimal breastfeeding behaviours such as exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and continued breastfeeding to 12 months can reduce childhood mortality by...
Reference this page
Review of indicators to assess Infant Feeding in Emergencies. Field Exchange 18, March 2003. p5. www.ennonline.net/fex/18/infant