Supplementary feeding in Zimbabwe
Summary of research1
During the periods 1992-3 and 1995-6, a child supplementary feeding programme (CSFP) was used in Zimbabwe to combat child malnutrition associated with times of drought. Evaluations in the past have concluded that the CSFP was effective in preventing an increase in malnutrition among children under five years, especially during the 1992-3 period. However, such evaluations made only cursory use of available household survey data. A recently published article based on a more detailed analysis of household surveys presents evidence that contradicts previous findings.
The objectives of Zimbabwe's CSFP included feeding vulnerable children, so as to maintain or improve the nutritional status of children under five in drought affected areas and to assist in averting starvation-associated child deaths. The CSFP aimed to provide children aged 6-59 months in all target areas with a nutritious meal that met 40% of daily energy requirements and 88% of daily protein needs. The official daily ration consisted of 66g of maize meal, 20g of groundnuts, 20g of beans and 12 ml of cooking oil. The programme comprised of wet feeding for five days a week, with local mothers providing the labour and water for cooking and cleaning up. Government and NGO officials managed the distribution and storage of CSFP rations.
Four nation-wide household surveys had previously been carried out in Zimbabwe, one occurring at the beginning or towards the end of both programme periods (1992-3 and 1995-6). Three of the national surveys were implemented by government ministries with support from UNICEF, while the fourth was a poverty assessment study. Re-analysis of these surveys set out to establish the following:
- the level of coverage of children under five in drought affected areas during the two programme periods
- the extent to which the CSFP reached children from poor and nutritionally vulnerable households, and how did this coverage compare to coverage of children from better-off households
- the proportion of malnourished children who actually got fed by the CSFP.
In order to check whether children from poor households got CSFP benefits, several poverty indices were developed, based on income poverty, consumption poverty and asset poverty. Assessment was questionnairebased, although specific content varied from one survey to another. Using mid upper arm circumference (the anthropometric index available in three of the four household surveys), the proportion of currently malnourished children receiving supplementary feeding was calculated.
In establishing the CSFP coverage level (table 1), re-analysis observed that:
- CSFP coverage was lower earlier in the life cycle of feeding programme and rose towards the end.
- Coverage was higher and more evenly spread in the 1992-3 period- the worst of the two droughts.
- CSFP coverage was patchy, with between one-quarter and two-fifths of areas without feeding programmes.
- Even within those areas covered, large numbers of children were not receiving supplementary feeding.
On the positive side, the regularity of supplementary feeding of beneficiary children appeared high.
|Table 1 CSFP coverage of children under five according to household surveys, 1992-3 and 1995-6|
|Date of survey||Proportion of under fives in CSFP for all rural areas||Proportion of under fives in CSFP where CSFP operational|
Targeting vulnerable children
With the exception of the March 1993 survey findings, half or more of under-fives from poor and nutritionally vulnerable households were not enrolled in supplementary feeding. Coverage of children from these households was lower in 1995-6 compared to similar periods in 1992-3. Even in areas where CSFP was operational, large numbers of children from poor and nutritionally vulnerable households did not receive supplementary feeding. It is not clear whether under-fives from poor households found it easier or harder to access supplementary feeding than did children from non-poor households - the evidence is mixed. What is clear is that the probability of children receiving or not receiving supplementary feeding was not particularly different between poor and non-poor households.
CSFP impact on nutritional status
The areas where CSFP was operational were not necessarily where levels of malnutrition were highest. Record keeping at feeding points on children's nutritional status before, during and after supplementary feeding was extremely haphazard. Large numbers of malnourished children were not in supplementary feeding, even in areas where CSFPs were operational. Less than half of malnourished children surveyed early in the life-cycle of both programmes were in supplementary feeding. Even at the height of programme coverage in March 1993, one-quarter of children were not receiving feeding in operational areas. Furthermore there was some evidence that malnourished children were less likely to be in the programme than other children. This could mean that the programme was effective or that malnourished children had less access. However, the reasons why children, even malnourished or poorer ones, did not attend remains obscure. One possible explanation put forward has been the opportunity cost to mothers.
A comprehensive evaluation of the CSFP impact on nutrition in Zimbabwe is not possible. No data were collected at feeding points and no information is available on the regularity or quantity with which individual children were fed. Furthermore, it is inappropriate to move, as the original evaluators did, straight into the analysis of impact indicators, while bypassing important questions about how many children got fed and what their socio-economic and nutritional status was.
The re-analysis does show that the 1992-3 CSFP should be distinguished from its successor in 1995-6. Overall, programme coverage was higher in 1992-3, as was the proportion of malnourished children who received supplementary feeding, especially in the latter part of the programme's life cycle. However, the success of the 1992-3 feeding programme was at best a qualified one. Even during peak coverage around March 1993, almost one-third of children, and one-quarter of all malnourished children, were without supplementary feeding.
Children who were enrolled in the programme tended to get five meals a week and amongst these, there is some evidence that feeding did provide nutritional benefits.
In essence, evidence from the household surveys casts considerable doubt on previous evaluations, in particular claims that CSFP played a major part in controlling malnutrition rates and preventing famine in Zimbabwe in 1992-3 and, especially, in 1995-6.
1Munro L (2002). Zimbabwe's child supplementary feeding programme: a re-assessment using household survey data. Disasters, 2002, 26 (3), pp 242-261
More like this
FEX: Community Supplementary Feeding Programme (CSFP) Evaluation in Zimbabwe
The first Field Exchange carried an article about the CSFP in Zimbabwe: Nutrition in commercial farms; finding the right plaster for the wound. Since then the findings of a...
FEX: Nutrition in Commercial Farms Finding the right plaster for the wound
by Leslie Adams (Provincial Nutritionist in the Ministry of Health in Mashonaland Central, Zimbabwe). Children living in Large Scale Commercial Farms in Zimbabwe, most of...
FEX: Monitoring the targeting system (Special Supplement 1)
In the past, little emphasis has been placed on monitoring what happens to food aid after it has reached the distribution point. Donor reporting has been limited to the...
FEX: Nutrition assessments in Zimbabwe: a local perspective
By George Kararach For the past two years, George Kararach has worked as a consultant policy analyst in Zimbabwe - for the last year working with UNICEF Zimbabwe. The support...
FEX: Postscript to 'Nutrition in commercial farms'
As co-editor of Field Exchange, and having just completed an evaluation of the CSFP in Zimbabwe for ODA, Jeremy had the following comments on this piece. This interesting...
FEX: Supplementary Feeding in Mandera: The Right Intervention?
View of the Mandera Camp Lourdes-Vazquez-Garcia worked for MSF Spain in the Mandera feeding centres during the period covered by this article. She subsequently qualified with...
FEX: Contextual data collection in nutrition surveys in Ethiopia
Women carrying grass grown in the Awassa region of Ethiopia, which they sell in the market to get a small income. Summary of analysis1 The study described in this article was...
FEX: Promoting Good Nutrition and Food Security in the Gaza Strip
by Jane Hanon (Terre Des Hommes, Gaza) The Gaza strip lies on the Mediterranean Coast between Egypt and Israel. It has an area of 360 square kilometres and just under one...
FEX: Advocacy from Eritrea: working with WFP
By Hassan Taifour Hassan Taifour is the Emergency Response Nutritionist for SC(UK). He graduated from the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum in 1985 and completed...
FEX: Constraints to achieving Sphere minimum standards for SFPs in West Darfur: a comparative analysis
A view of Mornei camp The current conflict in Sudan's westernmost state of Darfur began in early 2003, although most humanitarian agencies only gained access to the area and...
FEX: History of nutritional status and Concern’s response in Dessie Zuria woreda, Ethiopia
By Sarah Style Sarah graduated with a Masters in Public Health Nutrition from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in 2009. She recently returned from Ethiopia...
FEX: Setting objectives (Special Supplement 1)
Indian flood victims eat at open air kitchen in Nagari. The objectives of a targeting system arise from the definition of need (Section 1). Given a definition of need, the...
FEX: Finding the right MUAC cut-off to improve screening efficiency
Author Koert Ritmeijer, MSF Holland In Hlaing Thayer township, Yangon, Burma, ORWs were spending a considerable amount of time doing weight and height measurements on all...
FEX: Rapid impact on malnutrition through a multi-faceted programme in Wolayita, Southern Ethiopia
By Kate Sadler Kate Sadler undertook her MSc in Public Health and Nutrition at LSHTM. She has spent over 3 years working for Concern Worldwide in Burundi, Rwanda and...
FEX: Selective Feeding in War-Ravaged Northern Uganda
Mothers receiving supplementary ration By: John Moore and Mara Berkley-Mathews John Martin Moore completed training as a Registered General Nurse at National University...
FEX: Determining eligibility (Special Supplement 1)
Children are often a group targeted in emergencies Eligibility criteria, i.e. the characteristics of those individuals or households to be targeted with food, arise from the...
FEX: Enhanced Outreach Strategy/ Targeted Supplementary Feeding for Child Survival in Ethiopia (EOS/ TSF)
By Selamawit Negash, Nutrition Specialist, UNICEF Ethiopia Selamawit Negash (MPH) has been working as a Nutrition Specialist with UNICEF Ethiopia since April 2007. From...
FEX: The Targeted Supplementary Feeding Programme (TSF)
By Jutta Neitzel TSF distribution in Degehabur, Somali Region Jutta Neitzel is the Head of the Nutrition and Education Section at WFP Ethiopia. She has worked for the...
FEX: Estimating the Target Under Five Population for Feeding Programmes in Emergencies
By Anna Taylor Anna Taylor has been the nutritional advisor for Save the Children UK for a number of years. She has recently taken up a new post of Head of Basic Services in...
FEX: Iraq - Sanctions Take Their Toll
By Killian Forde Under article 41 of the United Nations Charter, the UN Security Council (UNSC) may call upon member states to apply measures not involving the use of armed...
Reference this page
Supplementary feeding in Zimbabwe. Field Exchange 18, March 2003. p8. www.ennonline.net/fex/18/supplementary