Issue 23 Editorial
This edition of Field Exchange carries a number of articles which challenge the effectiveness of our standard responses to food and nutrition emergencies. A review undertaken in the Great Lakes region (see research section) is highly critical of food security responses over the past 5 years. Criticisms included the adoption of too narrow a range of interventions, many of which were judged to be inappropriate, short-term and overly focused on the food production side rather than market access. Issues of cost-inefficiency were also highlighted when alternative interventions may have been implemented at a 'fraction of the cost'. Another review of nutrition programming in the southern Africa region undertaken on behalf of UNICEF and WFP included a focus on the emergency response during 2001-3 emergency (see research section). This element of the review raised serious questions over the effectiveness of selective feeding programmes with regard to coverage and impact. A field article by John Moore and Mara Berkley-Matthews in this issue on difficulties of attending and managing SFPs in war-ravaged northern Uganda highlight how the success of many such programmes are highly context specific although programme staff did manage to introduce measures to circumnavigate some of the security related problems of attendance,
In shining contrast Field Exchange carries a field article by Kristy Allen about a highly successful monetisation programme in Bulawayo . The Market Assistance Pilot Program (MAPP) is providing beneficiaries in Zimbabwe's second largest city, Bulawayo, with a low-cost maize alternative - sorghum - through existing commercial channels.
The price of sorghum is determined by income, household size, and the retail price gap between maize and sorghum. Retailers are also permitted a 15% mark-up on the product to ensure profitability. Local processors, distributors and retailers are also encouraged to invest in producing the product locally, the first step towards ensuring sustainable production at the local level.
The MAPP targeted more than 800,000 families in the Bulawayo area. Preliminary estimates suggest that the sorghum meal prices allowed most poor families in the target area to purchase sufficient food to feed all family members three meals per day for the six month duration of the pilot program. 77% of the highdensity population (460,000 people) were being fed per month by the MAPP. In recognition of the MAPP's impact and its potential to assist many more vulnerable households, USAID Food for Peace has approved a MAPP expansion to Gweru, targeting over 100,000 urban poor; an expansion to Chitunguiza, targeting 250,000 urban poor; and the continuation of the original program in Bulawayo.
Findings of a recent CIDA funded systematic literature review (to be reported in the next issue of FEx) on six types of emergency intervention (GFD, SFP, TFP, measles, vit Aand bednets) show very little published literature on the impact or cost of these programmes. A review by HPN (see research section of this issue) of both the published and grey literature of the impact of a broad range of humanitarian responses found a similar dearth of information. This review states that the humanitarian system currently lacks the skills and capacity to successfully measure or analyse impact.
There would now appear to be a growing body of support for introducing systems to ensure more effective monitoring of impact of humanitarian responses and awareness that knee-jerk standard responses often involving food aid may not always be appropriate or effective. At the same time, newer types of programming in the era of HIV/AIDS involving food aid need careful monitoring especially with regard to cost-efficiency. The soon to be published CIDA review will argue that there is currently no agency with overall responsibility for monitoring cost-efficiency of interventions. Thus, standard interventions are routinely trotted out by agencies for a variety of reasons (many of which do not necessarily relate to need, i.e. agency mandate, area of expertise, visibility, ease of accountability, availability of food aid rather than cash, etc). This means that there is no overall collation of information on effectiveness or cost, there is a lack of analysis of the grey literature and that opportunities which may arise in certain emergency contexts for controlled impact assessments are not capitalised upon. At the same time donors do not apply cost-efficiency criteria to proposals. There is a pressing need to remedy this situation. One solution may be to appoint an agency whose primary mandate is to compare costefficiency of different types of intervention in the humanitarian sector. Such an agency would also need to keep a close eye on assessing impact and cost-efficiency of newly emerging types of intervention, e.g. HIV/nutrition programming, before such programmes are rolled out on a large scale or become part of standard agency practice.
Finally, Field Exchange is pleased to be able to publish the findings of one of the first studies on impact of HIV/AIDS on food and economic security at community level. The article written by Celia Petty and John Seaman is based on a study of a modified form of Household Economy Assessment conducted in four countries. In two of the countries (Swaziland and Mozambique) researchers examined HIV/AIDS impact and found that in Swaziland, omitting the costs associated with illness and funerals, extra adult mortality attributable to HIV/AIDS over the past 5 years has caused a fall of approximately 8%-12 % in total community disposable income. However, the economic impact on individual affected households is specific to that household, and ranges from a small improvement in income/adult equivalent (e.g. death of an unemployed adult) to devastating loss (e.g. loss of one or more salaried/public sector workers). Overall, the net effect is to make very little change to the proportion of households falling below the defined poverty line.
The research provides a measure of the distribution of poverty in the study communities and casts doubt over the feasibility of deriving 'simple' HIV/AIDS related poverty indicators. This has implications for the design of social protection and welfare policies, as well as wider macro economic policy debates. For example, if only orphans were identified as eligible for free primary education or health care, many poor children would be excluded and some better off children included.
We hope you enjoy this issue of Field Exchange
Jeremy Shoham
Any contributions, ideas or topics for future issues of Field Exchange? Contact the editorial team on email: office@ennonline.net
More like this
FEX: A Market Support Programme to Address an Urban Food Crisis in Zimbabwe
By: Kristy Allen Kristy Allen-Shirley is the Communications Coordinator for the Consortium for Southern Africa Food Security Emergency (C-SAFE), based in Johannesburg, South...
FEX: Issue 19 Editorial
This issue of Field Exchange is dedicated to Prof. John Kevany (ENN Director) who died on 20th April 2003. John was instrumental in establishing the ENN. Given John's...
FEX: HIV/AIDS and Food Security
Summary of meeting Child-headed households benefiting from a home based care project Action Against Hunger (AAH) and Oxfam GB hosted an inter-agency meeting in London on Food...
FEX: Issue 25 Editorial
This special issue of Field Exchange focuses on the food aid component of HIV related programming and was made possible through additional funding from DFID RSA. How the ENN...
FEX: Review of Published Evidence for Impact of Emergency Feeding Programmes
Summary of unpublished paper1 The ENN have recently completed a review with funding from CIDA of the published evidence for the impact and cost-effectiveness of 6 key...
FEX: Update from Food Security, Livelihoods & HIV/AIDS Working Group
An AIDS orphan collects her food ration A second meeting of the Food Security, Livelihoods & HIV/AIDS Working Group (WG), co-chaired by Rebecca Brown (AAH) and Laura Phelps...
FEX: HIV/AIDS and Humanitarian Action
Summary of published report1 The Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) have just published a report which examines the implications of HIV/AIDS for understanding crisis and the role...
FEX: Nutrition Programming in the Southern Africa Emergency
Summary of unpublished report1 A review of UNICEF and World Food Programme (WFP) nutrition programming was carried out in six southern African countries (Lesotho, Malawi,...
FEX: Seed vouchers and fairs in Zimbabwe - CRS (Special Supplement 3)
In 2001/2, Zimbabwe experienced one of the worst droughts in ten years. Other factors which contributed to create a food crisis included economic decline, characterised by high...
FEX: Issue 22 Editorial
The more cynical amongst us in the emergency nutrition sector may sometimes be heard complaining that there is nothing new in this profession and that we just keep re-inventing...
FEX: Access to markets and services (Special Supplement 3)
6.1 Introduction In emergencies, access to markets may be lost for a number of reasons. Since most people live in a cash economy, restoring and maintaining adequate access to...
FEX: CAFOD
Name CAFOD Internet http://www.cafod.org.uk Address Romero Close, Stockwell Rd, London, SW9 9TY Director Julian Filochowski Telephone +44 207 733 7900 Overseas staff approx...
FEX: Community-based Approaches to Managing Severe Malnutrition
One nutrition worker's solution to childcare at a busy feeding distribution! A three day meeting was held in Dublin hosted by Concern and Valid International between 8-10th of...
FEX: HIV and nutrition: recommendations for nutritional care and support
Summary of a review1 HIV/AIDS and malnutrition are inextricably interrelated. Research suggests that malnutrition increases the risk of HIV transmission from mothers to babies...
FEX: ALNAP review of humanitarian system
Summary of published report1 A recently published report, commissioned under ALNAPs2 Humanitarian Performance Project, set out to chart the performance and progress of the...
en-net: Nutrition Consultant need-Very urgent
TERMS OF REFERENCE Turkana Health and Nutrition Project Evaluation and Impact analysis 1.Context The greater Turkana district composed of 6 districts has a total of 17...
Research on Food Assistance for Nutritional Impact (REFANI)
Bridget Fenn, the REFANI Pakistan Principal Investigator, talks about the results of REFANI at the ACF hosted Research for Nutrition Conference 2017. What is REFANI? The...
FEX: Three Ingredients of Success: Targeting Food Assistance in Western Kenya
By Karine Garnier, Ruth Situmu and Ben Watkins, WFP Kenya Karine Garnier (MPA) is a consultant now working with FAO Ruth Situma (MSc Public Health and Nutrition) is a...
FEX: Rethinking Food Aid in the Face of HIV/AIDS
Summary of published paper1 A recent detailed review of the relevant literature and the findings of a mission to eastern and southern Africa highlights the implications of the...
FEX: Emergency food-based programming in urban settings
Summary of published research1 Children attending Stara School, Nairobi, that receives WFP food support. The Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance 11 (FANTA-2) Project has...
Reference this page
Jeremy Shoham (). Issue 23 Editorial. Field Exchange 23, November 2004. p1. www.ennonline.net/fex/23/fromtheeditor
(ENN_2441)