Evaluation of ECHO Actions in DPRK
Summary of evaluation1
The European Commission's Humanitarian Office (ECHO) recently conducted an evaluation to assess the appropriateness of their interventions in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) since 2001. The methodology involved examining documentary research and interviews with primary stakeholders. The evaluation team spent three weeks in DPRK, with approximately half the time on field visits to ECHO-supported projects. Although ECHO have supported health, water, sanitation, nutrition and food sectors during since 2001, this summary of the evaluation only focuses on the findings in relation to the food and nutrition sectors.
Since the beginning of the emergency in 1995, international agencies have worked under severe restrictions in DPRK with limitations on access and very limited accountability. Agencies have generally been unable to work with technically qualified Korean counterparts, limiting opportunities for training and capacity building. Analysis of overall food aid to DPRK in recent years shows that political, rather than humanitarian, factors are the primary reason for variations in donor contributions. In DPRK, the food gap has officially been determined by the annual crop assessment and the national nutrition surveys (1998, 2002 and 2004). Uncertainties about the extent of the food gap are compounded by uncertainties about the extent of food aid, since food aid from China is not made public and is invariably the subject of considerable speculation. The methodological limitations of crop assessments are widely recognised. As in many other countries, the crop assessment in DPRK is largely based on figures provided by the government. In DPRK there is limited information available and what is available should be treated with caution. Vulnerability analysis crucially depends on data obtained at a local level. A good deal of this has been collected informally and/or unofficially by WFP in the course of its extensive monitoring programme, though much of it remains unanalysed.
There are particularly positive aspects of the food aid programme. These include implementation of the targeting system through institutions such as nurseries and kindergartens and the local production of fortified food. The targeting system, which is based on data made available by the government, provides WFP with a picture of the groups that require food aid, though not complete beneficiary lists. The division of beneficiaries into groups also allows for the adjustment of coverage, depending on funding availability, and the centralised system makes it possible to assume that most children will attend nurseries and kindergartens.
If economic reform and progress takes off, WFP may find it more difficult to justify the need for food aid in the near future, whether or not the position of vulnerable groups actually improves. Providing data on the access to food of vulnerable groups is more important than calculating the national food gap, and the continuation of WFPs programme will, in part, depend on their ability to persuade donors of the need to continue feeding vulnerable groups.
ECHO support to UNICEF in nutrition includes a wide range of inputs, including micronutrient premix for the local production of fortified food, F-100 therapeutic milk, micronutrient supplements and IEC (information, education and communication) support. The main findings of the evaluation in relation to nutrition included;
- ECHO could have benefited from some expert input on nutrition programming design and implementation and in future, technical assistance on nutrition should be sought, particularly at the time proposals are being reviewed.
- There is only limited implementation of nutrition programmes at a local level in DPRK. Local level implementation should be promoted along with an expansion of appropriate INGO partners.
- Protocols for the treatment of severe malnutrition are not being adequately implemented, leading to decreased impact on reducing severe malnutrition and lower chances of recovery and survival for severely malnourished children. The comparative ability of hospitals, baby homes and orphanages to manage malnourished babies and children should be assessed.
- F100 is being extensively used to feed non-malnourished children, which is inappropriate and is not cost-effective. In future, proper milk sources (not F100) should be provided to children aged 6-24 months who are not malnourished.
- Use of F100 for infants (under 6 months) is dangerous and measures should be in place to prevent this.
- Support to micronutrient premix is a strong component of the programme with potential to reach many vulnerable children.
- Lack of transport prevents some institutions from receiving food from WFP particularly as the quantities are usually small.
1Dammers C, Fox. C and Jiminez M, (2005). Report for the evaluation of ECHO's actions in DPRK 2001-4. January 2005, http://europa.eu.int/comm/echo/pdf_files/evaluation/2005/DPRKreport.pdf
More like this
FEX: DPRK in Crisis, What Do We Know?
This overview of the current situation in the DPRK and its context, was researched and written for Field Exchange by Killian Forde with editorial assistance from Lola Gostelow...
FEX: Nutrition in the DPRK - a field view
By Marie-France Bourgeois Marie-France Bourgeois spent four months at the end of 1997 monitoring and co-ordinating ECHO funded programmes in DPRK. In that time, she travelled...
FEX: When is a Famine a Humanitarian Crisis?
When is a Famine a Humanitarian Crisis? Dear Editor, All available evidence suggests that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is suffering, to use the word in the...
FEX: Setting objectives (Special Supplement 1)
Indian flood victims eat at open air kitchen in Nagari. The objectives of a targeting system arise from the definition of need (Section 1). Given a definition of need, the...
FEX: Huambo: an impending disaster?
By Anna Taylor SCF-UK Update on the current situation The last edition of Field Exchange included an account of discussions on how food aid should be targeted in the siege...
FEX: Supplementary Feeding Programme - Current Guidelines
Circumstances leading to the setting up of SFPs (from WFP guidelines) Blanket SFP Targeted SFP A generalised SFP for prevention purposes maybe implemented in the absence of a...
FEX: The dangers of rapid assessment
By Steve Collins The food economy of Northern Darfur is complex, with people depending on a wide variety of food sources. Morney Camp, Darfur. Dr. Steve Collins is a...
FEX: The dangers of rapid assessment
Note This article was already published in Field Exchange 13, unfortunately due to a printing problem, the end of the article flowed off the page. Therefore we reproduce the...
FEX: Nutrition Programming in the Southern Africa Emergency
Summary of unpublished report1 A review of UNICEF and World Food Programme (WFP) nutrition programming was carried out in six southern African countries (Lesotho, Malawi,...
FEX: Supplementary Feeding in Mandera: The Right Intervention?
View of the Mandera Camp Lourdes-Vazquez-Garcia worked for MSF Spain in the Mandera feeding centres during the period covered by this article. She subsequently qualified with...
FEX: Children’s Aid Direct
Name Children's Aid Direct Address Crown House, 6-8 Crown Street, Reading RG31 2SE, UK Executive director Nick Thompson Telephone 0044 118 958 4000 HQ Staff 49 Fax 0044...
FEX: A Review of the advances and challenges in nutrition in conflicts and crises over the last 20 years
Abbreviated version of unpublished paper Food distribution at the ICRC kitchen in Tonj. By Frances Mason and Anna Taylor This paper is a shortened version of the complete...
FEX: Taking the politics out of resource allocation: the Kenya experience
By Jeremy Shoham Jeremy Shoham is co-director of the ENN and editor of Field Exchange. Over the past two years he has been working periodically as a consultant for the...
FEX: Reconstruction in Bosnia: Implications for Food Security and the Future of Food Aid
The authors of this article are Fiona Watson and Aida Filipovitch. Both authors were nutrition Consultants working in B&H for WHO between 1993-6. This article describes the...
FEX: WFP HIV/AIDS Programming in Malawi
By Jeremy Shoham, ENN Households headed by the elderly may be vulnerable This article was written based on a WFP consultation to Malawi in February 2005. The WFP Malawi...
FEX: Assessing and defining food needs (Special Supplement 1)
Assessing food needs There are three broad approaches in use for assessing the food needs of a population. These approaches are often used simultaneously in an...
FEX: Recurrent pellagra in Angola
Summary of report* Since March 1999, successive waves of people have arrived in the town of Kuito, Angola, displaced by fighting in their native Bie province. As a result,...
FEX: Advocacy from Eritrea: working with WFP
By Hassan Taifour Hassan Taifour is the Emergency Response Nutritionist for SC(UK). He graduated from the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum in 1985 and completed...
FEX: Postscript to 'Outbreak of micronutrient deficiency disease'. By David Fletcher, WFP Kenya
by David Fletcher, Deputy Country Director, WFP/Kenya WFP Kenya would like to address some of the points made in the article entitled, "Outbreak of micronutrient deficiency...
FEX: Lessons learned in West Darfur: challenges in assessment methodologies
By Aranka Anema Aranka Anema has a background in medical anthropology. She is currently working with MSF-Holland as Medical Editor and has been involved with the Nutrition...
Reference this page
Evaluation of ECHO Actions in DPRK. Field Exchange 26, November 2005. p27. www.ennonline.net/fex/26/evaluation
(ENN_2342)