Menu ENN Search

Highlights from MSF-hosted meeting on outpatient and community based therapeutic care

By Kirsti Lattu, MSF Programme Officer and Caroline Grobler-Tanner, Independent Nutrition Advisor

Examining an infant in the TFC. Maradi, Niger

In 2005, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) treated more than 60,000 severely malnourished children during the crisis in Niger. Over 70% of the children were cared for on an outpatient basis, using Ready to use Therapeutic food (RUTF)1. In light of this experience, MSF hosted an informal technical meeting on 'New Perspectives in Responding to Nutritional Emergencies: Ambulatory and Community-Based Therapeutic Care (CTC)' on November 1, 2005 in New York. The forum provided an opportunity to exchange operational experiences in the treatment of severe malnutrition in emergencies. Discussions centred on programme implications and challenges raised by outpatient and community-based therapeutic care in emergency settings.

The meeting focused on three areas:

Presentations by Valid International, Concern Worldwide, Save the Children-US and MSF provided technical and contextual programme overviews from recent field experiences in Niger, Darfur, Ethiopia, Chad and Nigeria. The following key points emerged:

There is a general consensus, based on experience in different settings, that community based approaches (outpatient and CTC) using RUTF (Plumpy'nut and locally produced RUTF) are effective in treating severe acute malnutrition. Unlike traditional centre based care, they provide the opportunity for reaching very large numbers of children without incurring substantial additional costs.


Clarification of approaches

Outpatient care (synonymous with ambulatory care) focuses on the outpatient treatment of the majority of severely malnourished children and seeks to maximise coverage in the short term.

Community based therapeutic care (CTC) has similar aims but differs in that it places considerable emphasis on community mobilisation and participation that aims to maximise coverage and ensure the longer term viability of the programme.

Note: Except where specifically noted, the terms CTC and outpatient care have been used interchangeably in reporting these meeting highlights.


There is consensus regarding the use of the revised classification for acute malnutrition2. This classification based on CTC experience distinguishes between those requiring inpatient stabilisation care (acute malnutrition with complications) and those who can be treated directly on an outpatient basis (acute malnutrition without complications). This classification allows agencies to achieve high coverage while maintaining quality of care for those who require it.

There is agreement that we need to "do more and do it better." In other words, quantity does not have to come at the sacrifice of quality of care. Protocols and terminology now need to be clarified so that all can benefit from the experiences of organisations that are already engaged in ambulatory care and CTC interventions.

MSF's experience in treating more than 60,000 severely malnourished in Niger during the 2005 crisis demonstrates the enormous possibility of emergency programme scale-up using outpatient care, while maintaining excellent programme outcomes compared to SPHERE (cure rates >90%, mortality <5% and defaulting < 5%). Overall, 70%3 of the caseload was treated directly in an outpatient programme. This extended reach (coverage) has profound implications for all involved in caring for and preventing severe acute malnutrition.

In Niger, there were a number of international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working on development focused food and nutrition-related programmes. The 2005 nutritional crisis highlighted tensions and constraints in shifting from development to an emergency programme, as well as the need for a more proactive response independent of media attention.

Treatment for severe acute malnutrition is the same whether in an emergency or nonemergency setting. CTC should therefore, in principle, facilitate easier transitions between development and emergency response, given that the programme elements are the same.

Discussion points of interest

Programme experiences

Programme presentations from Niger, Darfur, Ethiopia, Chad, and Nigeria provided insights into outpatient care and CTC approaches in various emergency contexts. These contexts included functional, semi-functional, or nonfunctional health systems; areas of limited access due to insecurity or, by contrast (in the case of Katsina, Nigeria), programme operations in an area with neither security nor apparent food availability problems4. The CTC framework aims to maximise the comparative advantages of different agencies and is flexible enough to adapt for all of these contexts. As more agencies implement CTC in non-emergency settings, existing CTC programmes can facilitate emergency scale up. Proximity of services to beneficiaries is key to early presentation and early treatment. Other suggestions raised that might speed the transition to emergency scale response included:

However if we are seeing a trend towards specialisation, are there any organisations other than MSF ready to provide medical management of stabilisation centres? Once MSF has established emergency context stabilisation centres, their handover presents yet another challenge. In Niger, 18,000+ of the severely malnourished required inpatient care. In MSF's experience, due in part to the sheer caseload volume, handover of stabilisation centres was an issue because of limited or non-existent potential handover partners.

To improve patient outcomes in Niger, MSF distributes a 'protection ration' each time a child comes for outpatient care follow-up. The idea behind this is to prevent sharing by providing food for other members (particularly other children) in the household, as well as to promote the concept of RUTF as a medicine for the malnourished child.

In responding to the Niger crisis, MSF revived the concept of blanket feeding in operational areas. Efforts to 'blanket' feed all under fives by distributing locally available food offered another mechanism with which to inject food into households with young children.

Due to insufficient staffing or other programme obstacles, active case finding of malnourished children may not be feasible in every situation. For example, MSF enrolled 60,000 children in Niger without community outreach activities beyond active participation by mothers (caretakers) themselves.

Grey areas

Mothers line up with their children, all under five years old, at an MSF TFC in Maradi, Niger.

Discussions revealed several grey areas where there are gaps in information and understanding. For example:

In Niger and Nigeria, the majority of severely malnourished children are younger than 24 months. It was noted that if children survive past weaning age, they are less likely to relapse. Some sites admitted children of mothers who walked 20-30 kilometres, while other sites didn't attract parents (caretakers) who lived very nearby.

It is unclear why in some areas, selected families or even certain children, are more affected than others.

In Nigeria (population 150 million), where the measles vaccination coverage is less than 10%, there is a measles epidemic every two years resulting in malnutrition prevalence rate peaks corresponding with measles outbreaks. Emergency threshold levels for global acute malnutrition may not be reached in high population density settings such as Nigeria, but the overall number of severely acute malnourished children can be very high. Is this an emergency or chronic situation? Furthermore, how do we define nutritional emergencies? Given little or sometimes no nutritional surveillance data, it is challenging to differentiate between seasonal variations, normal and emergency levels from year to year. MSF's programme in Katsina State, Nigeria treated over 12,000 cases of malnutrition in 2005, initially in a post-measles epidemic response. At the time of the meeting, MSF's programme in Katsina State recorded 10.5% global acute malnutrition (GAM), 2.3% severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and had 10,104 admissions over 18 weeks. There were no epidemics at the time - is this a nutritional emergency or 'normal'? Who is responsible for responding to severe acute malnutrition, if the government does not?

Issues for further exploration

Priorities for next steps

Inpatient care in the MSFTFC, Maradi, Niger

Since community based approaches using RUTF are an accepted effective treatment for severe malnutrition, it will be important to develop clear guidelines and standards. The guidelines should note the similarities and differences between the different types of interventions (outpatient care, CTC), where they may be appropriate and expected programmes outcomes. Organisations considering implementing community based programmes and their donors need easy access to these guidelines and standards.

WHO and UNICEF leadership must work to quickly introduce and facilitate acceptance of community based approaches within national Ministries of Health. The role of UNICEF in both a coordination role and in ensuring sustainable supplies of RUTF in emergencies and beyond must be clearly defined.

One devil's advocate queried, "As many actors step up to undertake CTC or ambulatory care, will these types of programmes become another endless effort to alleviate chronic food and other nutrition-related issues, rather than addressing underlying root causes of malnutrition?" Hopefully not. However, acutely malnourished children need effective treatment. The good news is that for cases without complications, this treatment has now been radically simplified and thus is available to far more children than ever before.

For further information, contact, Caroline Tanner, email: or Christophe Fournier, MD/MSF Director of Programmes, email:

Show footnotes

1Plumpy'nut (Nutriset) was the RUTF used in Niger by all organisations involved in treatment of severe acute malnutrition.

2Collins S, Yates R. The need to update the classification of acute malnutrition. Lancet 2003; 362(9379):249. See also ENN special supplement no.2 Community Based Approaches to Managing Severe Malnutrition. Available from the EEN and online at

370% represents the uncomplicated cases. The other 30%, or some 18,000 cases, were complicated severe acute malnutrition requiring inpatient care.

4Although abundant food was available in local markets, due to price, food was inaccessible to many Katsina State residents.

More like this

FEX: Letter on community mobilisation in outpatient management of severe malnutrition, by Saul Guerrero and Steve Collins

Community mobilisation at the core of outpatient treatment of severe malnutrition Dear Editor, There is now a robust evidence base demonstrating that the outpatient care...

FEX: Management of moderate acute malnutrition with RUTF in Niger

Isabelle Defourny and Géza Harczi By Isabelle Defourny, Gwenola Seroux, Issaley Abdelkader, and Géza Harczi Isabelle Defourny is Deputy Desk Manager, MSF-France, Paris Géza...

FEX: Scaling up the treatment of acute childhood malnutrition in Niger

Milton Tectonidis By Isabelle Defourny, Emmanuel Drouhin, Mego Terzian, Mercedes Tatay, Johanne Sekkenes and Milton Tectonidis Emmanuel Drouhin is the Niger Desk Officer,...

FEX: Malnutrition peaks during malaria epidemic in Northwest Nigeria

By Chloë Wurr, Joke Zeydner and Saskia van der Kam Chloë Wurr is a medical doctor in Alaska and worked as medical coordinator with MSF-OCA Nigeria Joke...

FEX: Ambulatory treatment of severe malnutrition

Severely malnourished child with father Commentary by Dr. Steve Collins Dr. Steve Collins is a medical doctor with a doctorate in nutrition during emergency operations. He is...

FEX: Letter on nomenclature used in malnutrition programmes, by Mike Golden

Nomenclature used in programs for tackling malnutrition Dear Editor, The following terms, inter alia, have been used in describing programs/centres. CTC Community...

FEX: From Pilot to Scale-Up: The CMAM Experience in Nigeria

By Maureen Gallagher, Karina Lopez, Stanley Chitekwe, Esther Busquet & Saul Guerrero Maureen Gallagher is the Technical Coordinator for ACFInternational in Nigeria since July...

FEX: References for Special Supplement 2

Livelihood activities in South Sudan 1. World Health Organisation (WHO), Management of Severe Malnutrition: A manual for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva:...

FEX: CTC Approach (Special Supplement 2)

by Steve Collins (Valid International) 2.1 Main principles of CTC Community Therapeutic Care (CTC) is a community-based model for delivering care to malnourished people. CTC...

FEX: Simplified approaches to treat acute malnutrition: Insights and reflections from MSF and lessons from experiences in NE Nigeria

View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici By Kerstin Hanson Kerstin Hanson has a background in paediatrics and public health. She most recently...

FEX: Community-based Approaches to Managing Severe Malnutrition

One nutrition worker's solution to childcare at a busy feeding distribution! A three day meeting was held in Dublin hosted by Concern and Valid International between 8-10th of...

FEX: Ambulatory treatment of severe malnutrition in Afghanistan

By Emmanuelle Lurqin Emmanuelle is a paediatric nurse and since 2000, has worked with MSF Belgium on nutrition programmes in Angola, Burundi, and Afghanistan. She is currently...

FEX: Issue 31 Editorial

A mother attending a MSF programme in Niger One of the longest raging debates in nutrition continues in the letters section of this issue of Field Exchange. Put simply, does...

FEX: NOMA: a neglected disease!

News By GESNOMA, Winds of Hope, Sentinelles, and Médecins sans Frontières NOMA (cancrum oris and fusospirochetal gangrene or Necrotising Ulcerative Stomatitis),...

FEX: Introduction (Special Supplement 2)

Glossary ACF Action Contre la Faim CHA Community Health Assistant CHAM Christian Health Association of Malawi CNW Community Nutrition Worker CTC Community Therapeutic...

FEX: Simplifying the response to childhood malnutrition: MSF’s experience with MUAC-based (and oedema) programming

By Kevin P.Q. Phelan, Candelaria Lanusse, Saskia van der Kam, Pascale Delchevalerie, Nathalie Avril and Kerstin Hanson Kevin P.Q. Phelan was the Nutrition Working Group Leader...

FEX: Letter on inadequate coverage of SAM in Lancet Undernutrition Series, by Susan Shepherd

SAM inadequately addressed in the Lancet Undernutrition Series Dear Editor, In 2003, The Lancet captured and focused attention on saving children’s lives with the publication...

FEX: Integration of CTC with strategies to address HIV/AIDS (Special Supplement 2)

By Paluku Bahwere, Saul Guerrero, Kate Sadler & Steve Collins (Valid International) The district health officer of Dowa, Malawi, briefs clinic and community workers about the...

FEX: Technical and Management issues within CTC (Special Supplement 2)

4.1 CTC from Scratch - Tear Fund in South Sudan By Ed Walker (Tearfund) Beneficiaries collecting their general ration in South Sudan. Tearfund has been working in Northern...

FEX: The new role of Nigerien medical NGOs in treating SAM

A child enrolled in the SAM treatment programme By Dr Maidaji Oumarou, Dr Malam Issa Kanta, and Guillaume Le Duc Dr Maidaji Oumarou is Country Coordinator for BEFEN (Bien...


Reference this page

Kirsti Lattu and Caroline Grobler-Tanner (). Highlights from MSF-hosted meeting on outpatient and community based therapeutic care. Field Exchange 27, March 2006. p15.



Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.