Menu ENN Search

Counting and Identification of Beneficiary Populations in Emergencies: Registration and its Alternatives

This review is one in a series from the RRN, which aims to set out good practice in different sectors of emergency programmes based on the extensive experience of the reviewer.

Defining three processes (see box below), the author sets out to describe the most appropriate means of determining how many people may be in need of emergency assistance and identifying who they are.

'Counting'

the method of obtaining total figures of potential beneficiaries

'Identification'

goes beyond just counting - it is essentially a matter of 'knowing' which individuals are affected by the crisis

'Registration'

describes the activity of expressly collecting and formally recording specific qualitative and/or quantitative information about individuals of concern to

 

Full, formal registration of a beneficiary population has over recent years increasingly been considered to yield the most reliable quantitative and qualitative data on which to base planning and delivery of assistance and protection in emergencies. Food is one of the largest and most expensive components of any humanitarian assistance programme and one of the most common purposes of registration is to provide quantitative information on which to base programme planning particularly with regard to food aid and rations. However, in light of the rapid onset of many of today's emergencies and the size and expense and often controversial nature of registration exercises, total population registration should be seen as only one of the options for obtaining reliable figures for the effective delivery of assistance.

Why is it important to get accurate numbers of emergency affected victims?

1. To find out who and how many people are entitled to material assistance
2. To facilitate legal identity and protection.

The choice of methodology used to count and identify will be a function of the specific objective of the registration and the conditions at the time. The need for counting accuracy generally depends on the type of assistance planned. Food distribution generally requires as accurate figures as possible whereas water and health provision do not require the same degree of accuracy. Nevertheless the author keeps asking the question 'does this have to involve a full registration?'

Is a full registration appropriate for any given situation: Questions to ask?

Will setting registration as a pre-requisite for access to distribution reward exaggeration of numbers and dishonesty?. The reviewer gives the example of Hartisheik refugee camp in SE Ethiopia where the black market for ration cards was so well developed that registration did nothing to reduce abuse but rather encouraged it. He questions whether food allocations should have been linked to registration.

Before considering a registration

Why is it wanted?

  1. To secure legal status
  2. to determine rights to highly valued sources

if neither, consider

  1. Is this the only way objectives can be achieved?
  2. Is a FULL registration a priority NOW?
  3. For whom is it a priority?

Is it feasible? ... consider:

  • access
  • population movement
  • resources
  • security
  • timing
general information Numbers
community visual habitation centre
rapid research techniques < 5yr screening
household surveys flow monitoring
  overflights, photography

So when is registration recommended?

When is registration feasible?

Feasibility is dependent on a number of factors:

A clear assessment of all the factors mentioned above should be made and if conditions are clearly not suitable for a registration this should be communicated to those who are considering or proposing a registration. The author then proposes that if such an approach fails then attempts should be made to co-opt those pushing for the registration. "Put them in the hot seat and involve them deeply in the registration process. Let them face the problems".

The final conclusion of this section of the review recognises the importance of accurate identification of beneficiaries, but states that "registration is rarely the ideal method to achieve it. A combination of other methods should therefore be used. The methods are not mutually exclusive and over time triangulation or cross-referencing of sources of information should result in increasingly refined figures". The next two chapters of the review explore these 'other' methods.

Alternatives to Registration

Descriptions of each method are given with advantages and disadvantages highlighted. Apart from numbers, it is important to have cultural, economic and political information about a population and in the absence of registration there are at least three ways of obtaining such information. These are: The review is full of significant case-study material and ends with a chapter giving different scenarios which may predispose to one type of approach or another. The variables which define the five scenarios are:

The Review is available from The Relief and Rehabilitation Network, ODI, Portland House, Stag Place, London SW1E SDP.
Tel. 44 (0)171 393 1674
Fax. 44(0) 171 393 1699

More like this

FEX: Area sampling for rapid population assessment

Summary of a published paper1 In the initial phase of an emergency, an immediate assessment of population size is vital to provide relief workers with the necessary data to...

FEX: MSF experiences from Afghanistan: Maslakh camp

by Saskia van der Kam Saskia van der Kam is the headquarters nutritionist in MSF Holland. This article draws on her field trips to Afghanistan and a number of other MSF Field...

FEX: Food distribution in Mandera district (Kenya)

By Manuel Duce-Marques The author, Manuel Duce-Marques is a qualified nurse who spent several years working for MSF Spain in Mandera District, Northeast Kenya. He has just...

FEX: The impact of displacement on older people

Summary of report1 An older woman in Pakistan A recent report shines the spotlight on the experience of displacement for older people in an effort to increase...

FEX: WFP experiences of vulnerability assessment of Syrian refugees in Lebanon

By Susana Moreno Romero Susana Moreno Romero is the Food Security Specialist and responsible of the VAM (Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping) team in WFP Lebanon since 2013,...

en-net: Anthropometric survey target group: 0-59 months vs. 6-59 months and implications

Greetings EN-NET,
When I learned to do anthro surveys years ago, I was taught to sample children 6-59 months old. The rationale includes this group being most...

FEX: Distributing food (Special Supplement 1)

Food may be distributed in many different ways but the method of distribution will, to a large extent, depend on the eligible groups and the method for identifying them....

FEX: Targeting the Vulnerable in Emergency Situations: Who is Vulnerable?

Summary of Published Paper Mortality rates among young children are higher than those among the whole population (crude mortality rates) in emergency settings. This is part of...

FEX: Derivation of nutrient requirements for disaster-affected populations - Sphere Project 2011

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: The Sphere Handbook defines minimum standards and indicators for assessing humanitarian responses, including food and...

en-net: Calculation of MUAC Z Scores (Age)

Hi all,
I am trying to calculate the MUAC Z Scores based on Age for building a Macro in Excel. I am applying the folowing formula:
MUACZ=(((ac/m)**l)-1)/(s*l)....

FEX: Estimating the Target Under Five Population for Feeding Programmes in Emergencies

By Anna Taylor Anna Taylor has been the nutritional advisor for Save the Children UK for a number of years. She has recently taken up a new post of Head of Basic Services in...

FEX: Task Force Review

Summary of a Report by SPLM/SRRA-OLS Bahr el Ghazal Displaced people arriving from Wau In response to the humanitarian crisis which unfolded in Bahr El Ghazal (BEG) last...

Resource: Group Urges Disaster Planning for Pregnant Women, Babies, News article

Group Urges Disaster Planning for Pregnant Women, Babies By Rama Lakshmi Special to The Washington Post Thursday, August 17, 2006; Page A09 In the days after Hurricane...

FEX: Sales of food aid as sign of distress, not excess

To the editor of ENN Field Exchange: We find Mr. Gettier's letter concerning our article, "Sales of food aid as sign of distress, not excess" (Field Exchange Issue 4),...

FEX: Determining eligibility (Special Supplement 1)

Children are often a group targeted in emergencies Eligibility criteria, i.e. the characteristics of those individuals or households to be targeted with food, arise from the...

FEX: WFP evaluation of emergency operation in Sudan

Fasher-Kabkabiya and Kutum-Fasher, Dafur Summary of evaluation1 The World Food Programme (WFP) recently published an evaluation of their general food distribution programme...

FEX: High levels of mortality, malnutrition and measles amongst displaced Somali refugees in Dadaab, Kenya

Summary of published research1 Location: Dadaab, Kenya What we know already: Routine vaccination of children aged 6 months to 15 years, supplemented by mass vaccination...

FEX: Cross-sectional assessment of retrospective mortality in humanitarian emergencies

Summary of published research1 A scene from Port au Prince, Haiti, following the earthquake 6 days earlier. The rates and causes of mortality are critical indicators of the...

FEX: Experiences of emergency nutrition programming in Jordan

By Ruba Ahmad Abu-Taleb Ruba Ahmad Abu-Taleb is Nutrition coordinator at Jordan Health Aid Society (JHAS). She liaises between national and international NGOs and JHAS...

FEX: Somali Region Ethiopia

Summary of situation report Two consultants from UNICEF and WHO carried out an assessment of the emergency response in the Somali region of Ethiopia in August this year1. The...

Close

Reference this page

Counting and Identification of Beneficiary Populations in Emergencies: Registration and its Alternatives. Field Exchange 3, January 1998. p5. www.ennonline.net/fex/3/counting