Review of NGO engagement with the humanitarian reform process
Summary of report1
Women wait for a WFP general food distribution in Kabul
A recent report analyses the current state of global humanitarian reform efforts from a non-governmental organisation (NGO) perspective. This involved synthesis of a series of mapping studies carried out between November 2008 and February 2009 that looked at humanitarian reform in five countries: Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Ethiopia, Sudan and Zimbabwe. The research was commissioned by a consortium formed by six NGOs - Action Aid, CAFOD, CARE, International Rescue Committee (IRC), Oxfam and Save the Children UK - together with the International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA).
The United Nations (UN) humanitarian reform initiative was rolled out in 2005 following poor performance of the international community to the crisis in Darfur in 2004. It had four pillars:
- Improved humanitarian leadership (through humanitarian coordinators (HCs))
- Better coordination of humanitarian action (through the cluster approach)
- Faster, more predictable and equitable humanitarian funding
- More effective partnerships among humanitarian actors
Limitations of the reform process included the limited focus on accountability to affected populations and involvement of national and local actors.
The mapping studies emphasised the interlinked nature of the different elements of humanitarian reform, and found that the individual elements work best when all elements are working in concert.
The study found that progress has been patchy. Financing has seen the greatest progress with the creation of the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), although there remain challenges to get CERF funding to NGOs in a timely manner. There are also challenges with transparency concerning destination of Common Humanitarian Funds and Humanitarian Response Funds.
Gaps were found in humanitarian leadership with four out of five study countries lacking strong and experienced humanitarian leadership. The UN has continued to appoint unqualified HCs who do not adequately understand humanitarian action, who underestimate the importance of NGOs, who do not understand the critical importance of partnership, and who do not understand how even small amounts of funding can have a strategic impact in humanitarian response.
The study also found that involvement of NGOs in the reform process has been inconsistent. Where NGOs engage with the clusters, they often feel overwhelmed by meetings, and not respected as equal partners. Furthermore, they do not see reform grounded in accountability to the crisis-affected communities. While many NGOs will engage with clusters at the global level, they are finding that in several country situations, their staff continue to be frustrated by the inefficiency and inequality demonstrated in many clusters.
There has also been a failure to involve local and national NGOs in the process, especially with respect to accessing funds or meaningfully participating in coordination mechanisms. There are also questions about what role (if any) clusters should play in allocating funding. There is a perception that in some circumstances, priority is given to the cluster lead agency's projects. There is also concern that cluster lead agencies source funds with the aim of sub-contracting to NGOs who have already put forward projects for funding.
A striking feature of the mapping studies is that they found no hard evidence that UNcentred humanitarian reforms have improved the provision of humanitarian response thus far. The failure to establish benchmarks for overall system performance, as well as the failure to integrate accountability into the reform process, makes it hard to gauge the true impact of the reforms on affected populations.
The Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) should apply Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) standards for the appointment of HCs and only appoint people with substantial humanitarian experience.
UN agencies in the IASC should abandon the dual RC/HC model as the norm and separate the roles to allow for strong humanitarian leadership.
The ERC, UN agencies, global cluster leads and donors should ensure clusters have dedicated cluster leadership, accountability of the cluster lead to the HC and a collaborative approach following the Principles of Partnership.
The role of co-leads or co-chairs of clusters at field level needs to be clarified and donors should ensure financial support for NGO cluster co-leads or co-chairs.
By the end of 2010, the ERC, together with HCs and the IASC, must ensure that Humanitarian Country Teams are formed and involve NGOs in a meaningful way, in line with the Principles of Partnership.
International NGOs and UN agencies should identify ways to better involve their national partners in humanitarian coordination and reform mechanisms to promote more effective humanitarian responses.
Through their position on UN agencies executive boards, donors should hold UN agencies to account for applying the Principles of Partnership as endorsed by the Global Humanitarian Platform in 2007.
HCs, Humanitarian Country Teams, clusters and donors should ensure that funding procedures enable aid agencies to consult with, and respond to, feedback from crisis-affected communities, as well as ensuring projects reflect their priorities.
Donors should ensure flexibility and diversity in funding mechanisms, especially pooled funds, so as to facilitate access by NGOs - particularly local and national NGOs.
International NGOs should be transparent about documenting onward funding to national or local NGOs and should provide adequate overhead costs.
By the end of 2010, UN agencies receiving bilateral funds or donor funding via the CERF and pooled funds should be required by donors to provide evidence of the speed and transparency with which funding is passed through to NGOs.
UN agencies should standardise their procedures for funding NGOs to reduce transaction costs. This is to increase the access of national NGOs to these funds and to avoid the negotiation of overhead costs on a case-by-case basis.
Direct bilateral donor funding to NGOs should also be reformed to promote adequacy, responsiveness and timeliness. In particular, flexible and predictable funding should be provided to build NGO humanitarian capacity over the longer-term and enable speedy response in fast-breaking emergencies - neither of which are comparative advantages of the UN pooled funds.
1Humanitarian Reform Project (2009). Synthesis report. Review of the engagement of NGOs with the humanitarian reform process. Based on five country studies and commissioned by the NGO and Humanitarian Reform Project
More like this
FEX: Evaluation of cluster approach in Mozambique
Summary of evaluation1 Women displaced by floods wait to receive food rations at Chupanga camp, near Caia in Sofala Province. A real time evaluation (RTE) of the response to...
FEX: Grand Bargain: Reform or business as usual?
Views Summary of comments* and review** Location: Global What we know: Inadequate resources are a severe and increasing constraint on humanitarian action in the face of...
FEX: ACF review of humanitarian reform
Summary of review1 Action contre la Faim (ACF) has published a review of recent humanitarian reforms that include the Cluster Approach, new humanitarian financing mechanisms...
FEX: IASC Nutrition Cluster: Key Things to Know
The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) have recently produced a 'Note' about the Cluster Approach which includes details about the Nutrition Cluster component. Cluster...
FEX: Global Nutrition Cluster Rapid Response Team
By Ayadil Saparbekov View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Ayadil Saparbekov has been in a position of the Deputy Global Nutrition Cluster...
FEX: SC UK’s experiences with Central Emergency Response Funds (CERF)
Summary of evaluation report1 In May 2007, Save the Children UK (SC UK) surveyed all of its field programmes operating in countries where Central Emergency Response Funds...
FEX: The state of the humanitarian system
Summary of report1 A recent report by ALNAP presents a system-level mapping and analysis of the performance of international humanitarian assistance between 2009 and 2011...
FEX: ALNAP review of humanitarian system
Summary of published report1 A recently published report, commissioned under ALNAPs2 Humanitarian Performance Project, set out to chart the performance and progress of the...
en-net: Consultant(s) needed: Review of GNC Handbook
Save the Children and UNICEF are seeking qualified professionals to undertake the revision of the Global Nutrition Cluster Handbook. The current Nutrition Cluster Handbook...
FEX: Development of Rapid and Comprehensive Assessment Tools for Emergencies
At a recent meeting of the Inter Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Nutrition Cluster (see box) in Rome, work on assessment in emergencies was shared. An assessment sub-working...
FEX: Promoting an integrated famine prevention package: Breaking bottlenecks
Summary of the report of the global Food Security and Nutrition Cluster meeting, 26 April 2017 at World Food Programme HQ, Rome The global Food Security Cluster (FSC) and...
FEX: Humanitarian financing for older people and people with disabilities
Summary of study1 A recent study quantifies the funding provided by donors to meet the humanitarian needs of two of the most vulnerable groups: older people and people with...
FEX: Real time evaluation of Pakistan Flood Response
Summary of evaluation1 The Pakistan floods of 2007 devastated large swathes of rural Sindh and Balochistan Provinces in southern Pakistan, destroying homes, crops and roads,...
en-net: Call for application for Food Security Cluster Coordinator Roster
Food Security Cluster Coordinator (Expert Roster) Call for Applications The global Food Security Cluster (gFSC) is calling for applications from interested candidates to be...
en-net: National Nutrition Cluster Co-coordinator South Sudan: Concern Worldwide
National Nutrition Cluster Co-Coordinator, South Sudan About the role: This is a 12 month, role with unaccompanied terms based in Juba with a salary of Grade 6 (€44,883 -...
FEX: Accountability to affected populations: Somalia Nutrition Cluster experiences
By Samson Desie and Meftuh Omer Ismail View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Samson Desie is a nutrition specialist currently working as...
View this article as a pdf Since its inception over ten years ago, the Global Nutrition Cluster (GNC) has progressed from its early focus on the development of technical tools...
FEX: Coordinating the response to the Syria Crisis: the southern Turkey cross border experience
This views piece was developed by the ENN based on eight key informant interviews with donors, UN agencies and INGOs carried out during an ENN visit to southern Turkey in early...
FEX: Nutrition coordination in Zimbabwe: Achievements and Challenges
By Dianne Stevens, UNICEF Zimbabwe Dianne Stevens is the Nutrition Manager with UNICEF in Zimbabwe. She chairs the Nutrition Technical Consultative Group responsible for...
Blog post: Reflections from ENN - maximizing on the value and potential of the GNC and SUN Movement
ENN has returned from the Global Nutrition Cluster (GNC) annual meeting in Amman, Jordan, where it seemed that everyone was talking about the humanitarian development nexus as...
Reference this page
Review of NGO engagement with the humanitarian reform process. Field Exchange 38, April 2010. p7. www.ennonline.net/fex/38/review