Focus on coverage assessment
During the past 10 years, the management of acute malnutrition has undergone a major paradigm shift that has changed the previous inpatient ‘clinical’ model of care into a community-based “public health” model of care. Since 2007, this new model, called Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) has expanded rapidly and is now implemented in over 55 countries worldwide.

Wide area survey during SQUEAC's stage 3 in Gassi (Mali)
In the old clinical model, the main determinant of impact was the quality of the inpatient medical and nutritional care provided in the centres and hospitals. By contrast, in the CMAM model, the key determinants of impact are the degree to which interventions access people early in the course of their disease and the ability to reach as many of those affected as possible. This is a profound shift that requires an equivalent change in the protocols and indicators used to implement and monitor programmes. Previously in the clinical model, impact was achieved using in-depth medical and nutritional protocols and results were monitored using clinical outcomes indicators. Now, the simplicity and robustness of the CMAM treatment protocols are such that so long as the simple basics such as ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) are available and those afflicted by acute malnutrition present early and in sufficient numbers, then impact is assured. In the new CMAM public health model, the focus on clinical guidelines has been replaced by protocols to ensure that those who are affected are admitted into programmes early and the clinical outcome indicators have been supplemented by the direct assessment and monitoring of coverage.
The Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage (SQUEAC) coverage assessment method is a new set of tools that draws together access and coverage, the two essential determinants of quality CMAM programming. SQUEAC combines an array of qualitative information about access and the perceptions of CMAM programmes with small sample quantitative surveys. These surveys test hypotheses generated during the qualitative work and establish levels of programme coverage in key geographical areas. This combination both identifies key issues affecting presentation and programme uptake, whilst also establishing the actual levels of coverage attained. Vitally, all this can be done in real time, allowing the tool to be of immediate practical use to tweak programme design and implementation in response to the information obtained.
The key to the success of SQUEAC is diversity, triangulation and iteration, that gradually builds up a picture of the “truth” about programme coverage, whilst at the same time, indicates what practical measures can be undertaken to improve access and coverage. The beauty of the technique is that it combines information that is often routinely collected but rarely used, with other data specifically collected by fast, low resource methods. Directly harnessing existing routine monitoring data to improve impact and program effectiveness greatly increases the cost efficiency of the additional time spent collecting new data, thereby decreasing the time and resource overheads required to implement SQUEAC.
SLEAC (Simplified LQAS Evaluation of Access and Coverage) was designed to fill a gap in the early SQUEAC methodology regarding the method's ability to assess overall programme coverage. This gap has now been addressed in SQUEAC and SLEAC has been adapted as a tool for assessing coverage over wide areas. As CMAM shifts from a donor-funded emergency intervention into a routine part of primary health care programming, the resources available to implement these programmes will inevitably decrease. In this environment, low resource methods to increase timely access, monitor coverage, and allow programme design to be proactively refined in view of these, are essential if CMAM is to maintain its effectiveness. In my opinion, SQUEAC is a major step forward towards achieving these goals.
Adapted from foreword by Steve Collins. Technical Reference for SQUEAC and SLEAC Methods, 2012. FANTA.
More like this
FEX: High OTP coverage through the Ministry of Health in Chad
By Casie Tesfai Casie Tesfai is currently the Nutrition Technical Advisor for the International Rescue Committee based in New York. She has 10 years of nutrition experience...
FEX: Quantity through quality: Scaling up CMAM by improving programmes Access
By Saul Guerrero & Maureen Gallagher Saul Guerrero is the Senior Evaluations, Learning and Accountability (ELA) Advisor at ACF UK based in London. Prior to joining ACF, he...
en-net: FANTA Update: March 2013
FANTA UPDATE | March 2013 In this issue of the FANTA Update, we highlight some of the latest publications, events, and news from the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance...
en-net: Real and theoretical coverage of a nutrition program
Hello colleagues, I would like to know the definition of the actual and theoretical coverage of a nutrition program and how they are measured. Thank you Dear Mark and...
FEX: Sampling in insecure environments: Field experiences from coverage assessments in Afghanistan
By Ben Allen, Mark Myatt, Nikki Williamson, Danka Pantchova and Hassan Ali Ahmed Ben Allen has been Global Coverage Advisor for Action Against Hunger UK for the past two...
FEX: A single coverage estimator for use in SQUEAC, SLEAC, and other CMAM coverage assessments
By Safari Balegamire (VALID International), Katja Siling (World Food Programme), Jose Luis Alvarez Moran (Coverage Monitoring Network), Ernest Guevarra (VALID International),...
FEX: Considerations regarding coverage standards for selective feeding programmes
By Ernest Guevarra, Saul Guerrero and Mark Myatt Ernest Guevarra leads Valid International's coverage assessment team. He has formal training as a physician and a public...
en-net: SQUEAC survey consultant - Concern Worldwide - South Sudan
Concern Worldwide is looking for a consultant to carry out a SQUEAC survey in Aweil West and North in South Sudan. Terms of Reference 1. Background The SQUEAC Survey is to...
FEX: Why coverage is important: efficacy, effectiveness, coverage, and the impact of CMAM Interventions
By Mark Myatt and Saul Guerrero Mark Myatt is a consultant epidemiologist. His areas of expertise include surveillance of communicable diseases, epidemiology of...
FEX: The Coverage Project: a national partnership for evaluating CMAM services in Nigeria
By Maureen Gallagher, Saúl Guerrero, Ifeanyi Maduanusi and Diego Macías Maureen Gallagher is the Senior Nutrition & Health Advisor Action Against Hunger US based...
en-net: Output Monitoring System for Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM)
Dear colleagues, The IMAM team in Viet Nam will establish an output monitoring system this year for SAM and MAM management and ideally integrate other key interventions in the...
Resource: Innovations in Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM)
The implementation of community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) as the standard model of care for children with acute malnutrition has significantly increased...
FEX: Community weighting of barriers and boosters in Democratic Republic of Congo
By Lenka Blanárová, Sophie Woodhead and Mark Myatt Lenka Blanárová is a Community Mobilisation Advisor at ACF-UK, supporting nutrition programmes...
en-net: Resources for coverage assessment
Dear all The following documents have been uploaded to the ENN resource library and may be of use to you in answering basic questions and locating resources on coverage...
en-net: Validation of sphere standards in a normal integrated CTC setup
In emergency situation the CTC/ CMAM approach considering successful when it has not passed minimum sphere standards like cured rate - 75% , defaulter rate - 15% and death rate...
en-net: Monthly program coverage calculation for TFP / SFP
In order to track program coverage for a TFP (for example) on a monthly basis, I would use Mark M.s Indirect Method = No. of children attending SCs and OTPs / (Estimated prev'...
en-net: Geographical area for coverage survey
I am planning a SQUEAC survey in Haiti. Our PTAs are spread through 5 Communes (Provinces) which are relatively close together. The problem is that in the middle of this 5...
en-net: Recovering case
Hello Everyone, Could someone help me understand why in the circumstance described below we consider the child in the "recovering case group" while conducting a SQUEAC...
FEX: CTC Approach (Special Supplement 2)
by Steve Collins (Valid International) 2.1 Main principles of CTC Community Therapeutic Care (CTC) is a community-based model for delivering care to malnourished people. CTC...
en-net: Monitoring with MUAC on admission
We're considering monitoring MUAC on admission but are having some issues in how to interpret it. 1) What would be the MUAC cut-off of early vs. late admissions? We've...
Reference this page
Focus on coverage assessment. Field Exchange 42, January 2012. p33. www.ennonline.net/fex/42/focus
(ENN_4255)