Qualitative review of an alternative treatment of SAM in Myanmar
By Naomi Cosgrove, Jane Earland, Philip James, Aurélie Rozet, Mathias Grossiord and Cecile Salpeteur
Naomi Cosgrove has over 13 years of experience in the food industry. in addition to experience in the humanitarian sector, including a local Mental Health & Development NGO in Sri Lanka and as a Food Security, Livelihood & Hygiene Advisor in Northern Argentina. This research project was completed as part of her Masters in Human Nutrition.
Jane Earland is a registered Dietitian and Public Health Nutritionist and works in nutrition and research at the Universities of Liverpool and Sheffield. Her background includes nutrition education and training in Papua New Guinea for 11 years, Field Director for Save the Children and short term work in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea.
Aurélie Rozet is a nurse trained in nutrition and has been working with ACF since 2006 in Asia in particular. She was a Nutrition Programme Manager in Myanmar at the time of the programme evaluated in this article and now supports theACF France Nutrition team in Paris.
Mathias Grossiord is a Public Health Nutritionist (MSc) and was a Nutrition Programme Manager in Myanmar at the time of the programme evaluated in this article. He is now Nutrition Programme Manager for ACF in India.
Phil James was a Masters student with LSHTM in 2010 analysing the performances of the alternative treatment of SAM in Myanmar and is now Emergency Nutrition Coordinator for ACF UK. He is preparing a scientific article with ACF on this MSc thesis.
Cecile Salpeteur is a public health nutritionist and is ACF HQ Operational Nutrition Research Facilitator and HIV focal point. She has six years ACF field experience in implementing a wide range of nutrition and food security programmes.
Children attending a stabilisation centre
In 2009, Action Contre la Faim (ACF) treated an estimated 18,000 children under five years for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in Maungdaw and Buthidaung Townships and Sittwe, Rakhine state, western Myanmar. This followed a change of protocol in January 2009 where the identification of malnourished children was switched from being based on National Centre for Health Statistics (NCHS) standards to the 2006 WHO International Child Growth Standards (ICGS)1,2. As a result of this change, the number of children falling into the category of severe malnutrition increased dramatically (a multiplication factor of 5.6) so that there was an increased amount of product required to treat these children. In addition, in April 2009, there were complications with the import of the ready to use therapeutic food (RUTF) (Plumpy’Nut©). This meant that there was insufficient stock to cover the case load of SAM affected children until the end of the year and ACF had to identify a solution to the problem3.
Modified treatment protocol
ACF decided to modify the treatment protocol and introduced a second phase of treatment, once the child had improved from a severe to a moderate (MAM) stage of malnutrition (see Figure 1 for existing and modified treatment protocols). Eligible children for this ‘Alternative Treatment’ were uncomplicated MAM cases, without oedema, above six months of age and with increasing weight. The intake of RUTF for this second phase was reduced from two or three sachets per child per day (depending on body weight as defined in the usual protocol) to only one sachet and hence a reduction in kilocalories. This reduction ranged from 116% (< one year old) to 62% (> four years old) of the child’s daily energy needs, based on an average requirement of an adequately nourished child within that age category4. As a result, ACF staff advised caregivers to make up the energy requirements of the child with food available at home5.
This Alternative Treatment was implemented from July 2009 to January 2010 and the data were collected, analysed and compared to the same period the year before. Despite the reduced ration using the Alternative Treatment, the performance of the programme was found to be as good and in some instances, better than when the Standard Protocol was used in 2008. However there were limitations to comparing these two data periods, mainly due to the different standards being used (NCHS in 2008 versus WHO in 2009). Nevertheless, results of the Alternative Treatment greatly exceeded the international Sphere Standards.
Paediatricians and scientists who developed the normal treatment protocol for SAM were aware that that the quantity of RUTF sachets given to children was rounded up to the higher figure and maintained throughout the treatment until complete recovery, in order to simplify implementation by health personnel. However, the nutritional needs of the child for catch up growth are expected to decrease as his/her nutritional status improves. Thus the quantities administered in the latter stages of treatment are not fully justified from a nutritional perspective6.
Rationale for proposed study
As the key drivers behind this successful programme outcome were not fully understood, ACF wanted to carry out further study.
Aims & objectives
The overall aim of this study was to identify the factors that contributed to the success of the Alternative Treatment. The objectives were:
- To identify all factors associated with success of the intervention, as well as areas for improvement in the Myanmar programme using the Alternative Treatment.
- To develop a feasibility grid system for identifying another country with these optimum conditions for further testing of the Alternative Treatment.
See Figure 2 for a summary of the eight stage study design used in this research project and described in more detail here.
- A literature review was conducted to identify new innovative tools and methods for qualitatively evaluating programmes and the factors that may influence the success of feeding programmes. This was used to inform the development of the interview guide and analysis7.
- ACF documents and reviews were collected and reviewed that included capitalisation reports from the relevant field Programme Managers during 2009 and ACF Country Operational Strategy Reports (2009 and 2011) from ACF HQ Paris. Notes were taken from these documents to inform the questions for the interview guide. This information was also used to validate the data gathered from the interviews at a later stage, i.e. a triangulation approach8.
- Using information gathered from steps one and two, the interview guide with key questions was developed as a tool for conducting the interviews. These questions needed to be open ended to ensure accurate, non-biased answers. Probes and follow up questions were added where necessary, to ensure the question was fully answered. Seven key areas were identified as areas to explore in the interview. Questions were developed for each and were incorporated into the interview guide. These areas were:
- General introduction and context of Myanmar.
- Opinions and descriptions of the Nutrition Programme
- Management Style
- Training and Capacity Building
- Community Involvement
- Other ACF programmes
- Other international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) working in the area.
- In-depth interviews were conducted, lasting up to an hour, with key informants across a range of professional disciplines to obtain an accurate and balanced perspective of the programme, processes and relationships. Where possible, the interviews were held face-to-face - this was not always possible due to logistics and therefore several were done through Skype. Key people interviewed included the Nutrition Advisor in ACF Paris HQ, regional and local Nutrition Managers, the local Human Resources Manager for the programme, the Head of Base (logistics and administration) and local Programme Managers in other ACF programmes.
- A Pattern, Theme and Content Analysis method was used to analyse the data collected. The analysis consisted of identifying core consistencies and meanings from the material and interviews. Patterns and themes were searched for across all information provided (both interview transcripts and notes from the relevant documents) and re-occurring words and texts were identified, including their frequency and the context in which they were used9. Data were presented in the form of quotations with sufficient context to ensure that they could be interpreted.
- The early findings were discussed in a workshop which included two highly valued individuals who had a great deal of field experience. The five key questions which were debated in the workshop were:
- How solid, coherent and consistent is the evidence in support of the findings?
- To what extent and in what ways do the findings increase and deepen understanding of the situation/ success of the Alternative Treatment for SAM?
- How do these qualitative factors complement the quantitative outcomes and help to explain the success of the programme?
- To what extent are the findings consistent with other knowledge?
- To what extent are the findings useful for use in other programmes globally?
The initial findings were also sent to two of the interviewees to get reactions and additional comments.
- A one page success factor matrix was developed and discussed in the workshop. The aim of this matrix was to visually represent the findings and correlate them with the quantitative outcomes.
- A simple, one page feasibility grid was also developed and discussed in the workshop. This involved creating a series of questions and a scoring system. The aim of this grid is to identify another country with optimum conditions for further testing the Alternative Treatment.
The fourteen factors that were consistently identified as key contributors to the success of the Alternative Treatment are summarised in Figure 3. Eight areas of improvement were also identified and are summarised in Figure 4.
These success factors were then placed at the relevant levels in terms of local context, community involvement, the Nutrition Programme, the mother/caregiver and the BNF/child.
* Quantitative outcomes were measured from admission to discharge.
* The remaining % of children: 6.71% had an unknown outcome, 0.07% transferred due to medical complications and 0.91% were non responders
* Children spent a median of 14 days on phase 1 and 21 days on phase 2 of the Alternative Treatment
The discussion below focuses on the key outcomes including the Success Matrix and the Feasibility Grid and also raises additional findings and considerations from the research.
The Success Matrix
The Success Matrix was developed to build a picture of the data as a whole to aid systematic analysis and link the qualitative findings to the quantitative outcomes (see Figure 5).
The Feasibility Grid
The Feasibility Grid needed to be in a spreadsheet form that could be used for identifying other countries that also have optimum conditions for further testing the Alternative Treatment. Input and feedback was given by all those people that would be using it to ensure it was user-friendly and relevant.
The grid was developed as a series of questions to be answered by Country Nutrition Co-ordinators for each country being considered for replicating the Alternative Treatment. There is a simple scoring system. If the answer is yes to a question, 1 point is given and if no, 0 points are given. This enables each country to be ranked, in order to identify the optimum country for further testing the alternative protocol. All questions were given the same weighting although weighting might be considered in future versions of the grid. The country that scores the highest points is the recommended country.
The grid could potentially be adapted and used for on-going programmes in the future, including as an annual quality check. A portion of the spreadsheet is shown in Table 1. The full spreadsheet is available on request from the author.
|Table 1: Further testing the Alternative Treatment: A sample of the Feasibility Grid|
Has it been confirmed that there are no natural disasters or any other potential/ planned risks in the coming 6 months, which could jeopardise household (HH) Food Security?
Does each HH have food access and its availability guaranteed for 6 months (whether through good agricultural season or through food assistance)?
Has each HH access to drinkable water in the area of CMAM implementation and guaranteed for 6 months?
Are health services available and functioning in the area for the next 6 months?
Is the security level of the mission and base =< level 2?
Is ACF established and been active in the area for at least 1 year?
Does ACF have a good working relationship with national & local authorities as well as humanitarian actors in Health and Nutrition in the area?
Have WHO international standards been adopted? If not possible, has consideration be given to earlier identification of children using NCHS ref. but with a cut-off of. WHZ < -2.5?
Has the community been sensitised and mobilised in the area in terms of awareness, education and support of the programme?
Have key members from the community been identified and trained as community caregivers for continuous screening of children and ensuring early referrals to the centres? If not, has this been built into the planning stage of the project?
Discussion on what makes a good quality programme
Responses were not consistent to the interview question on what makes a good quality programme. However there were several recurring themes, including good programme management, staff training, educating the caregiver on the causes of malnutrition and caring for the child, and having a preventative strategy in place. The review of published papers on programme effectiveness indicated that there has been very little discussion at an international level on programme quality and the impact this has on the outcomes. There appears to be an emphasis on quantitative outcomes and limited understanding of the factors which contributed to these outcomes, i.e. the ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions, which are typically addressed through qualitative research. This suggests a need for a clear definition and set of guidelines regarding programme quality, as well as more published studies examining the qualitative aspects of humanitarian programmes globally.
Cost saving of using less RUTF versus additional time and resource needs
Although there were some cost savings in using the Alternative Treatment in terms of product, the research shows that more time and resource are required by the staff and management to ensure successful implementation. Although the amount of additional time and resources to implement the alternative protocol in the Myanmar programme are believed to be relatively low due in part to exceptional management and highly competent, well trained staff, this will not always be the case going forward in other missions and countries.
Ideal setting in Myanmar
There are a number of reasons as to why this was an ideal setting for testing the Alternative Treatment. These included absence of natural disaster during 2009, home feeding being part of the treatment, and existence of well trained and experienced staff. However it is important to consider that if any of these factors were to change, the outcomes could be very different. It is also worth noting that ACF had complete control of the programme and did not depend on the government and local amenities for any aspect of programming. This will not always be the case, especially as a key objective for many INGOs today is to empower local governments so that they can implement nutritional services.
Sustainability of the programme
Some of the constraints to sustainability include the high turnover of local medical staff, the high cost of the RUTF product (over 50% of total programme costs)10 and the need to import product. Insufficient government involvement in the programme also impedes sustainability. This suggests the urgent need for strategic review. Despite high levels of community awareness, there appears to be no improvement in overall malnutrition rates in the intervention area of ACF in Myanmar since the programme began in 2003 and children continue to be admitted.
The aim and objectives of this study were successfully achieved using both review of documents and in-depth interviews. The study has shown the importance of combining qualitative and quantitative research to give a comprehensive picture and meaning to the figures. This combined learning has led to a deeper understanding of the Alternative Treatment.
The results from this research project have given invaluable insights into the Alternative Treatment of SAM. The findings confirm that it is not only the high quality of RUTF itself which is necessary for success, but a large number of quality considerations some of which may be specific to the local context in Myanmar. It is a combination of all of these factors that resulted in the quantitative outcomes far exceeding the Sphere Standards and it is these factors which need to be considered before the Alternative Treatment is replicated globally.
This research project indicates that there needs to be a stronger emphasis on nutrition programme design. Key design issues and factors include careful planning, existence of well trained staff and community mobilisation.
The findings have also shown that the current programme is not sustainable in Myanmar and that future strategies must address this challenge.
For more information, contact; Cécile Salpéteur, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
1NCHS. (2011). National Centre for Health Statistics. Retrieved 28.04.11, 2011
2WHO. (2011). World Health Organisation. Retrieved 28.04.11, 2011
3ACF (2009). ECHO Report - Integrated Approach to malnutrition through nutrition, health and care practices.
4FAO, WHO, UNU Human energy requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. FAO: Rome, 2004
5James, P. (2010). Evaluation of an Alternative Protocol for the Treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition, implemented by ACF Myanmar from July 2009 to January 2010 Masters in Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Also see Footnote 3.
6Golden, M. (2011). RUTF Sell - Prevention and Treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition Forum Area. http://www.en-net.org.uk/question/362.aspx also Footnote 4.
7Literature review: Dersham, L. (2011). Design, Monitoring and Evaluation - Save the Children. Retrieved 05.05.11. Draper, A. and J. A. Swift (2011). Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: data collection issues. J Hum Nutr Diet 24(1): 3-12. Green, J. and N. Thorogood (2009). Analysing Qualitative Data. Qualitative methods for Health Research. D. Silverman, SAGE publications Ltd: 195-228. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications Ltd. . Pilnick, A. and J. A. Swift (2011). Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: assessing quality. J Hum Nutr Diet 24(3): 209-214.
8Green, J. and N. Thorogood (2009). Analysing Qualitative Data. Qualitative methods for Health Research. D. Silverman, SAGE publications Ltd: 195-228
9Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications Ltd.
10James, P. (2010). See footnote 5.
More like this
View this article as a pdf Content previously published in Field Exchange is also relevant to this issue's focus on continuity of care for acutely malnourished children. You...
By Jeanette Bailey, Rachel Chase, Marko Kerac, André Briend, Mark Manary, Charles Opondo, Maureen Gallagher and Anna Kim Jeanette Bailey is the Project Director for...
By Saul Guerrero & Maureen Gallagher Saul Guerrero is the Senior Evaluations, Learning and Accountability (ELA) Advisor at ACF UK based in London. Prior to joining ACF, he...
View this article as a pdf Upcoming research Action Against Hunger conducts operational research with academic partners to contribute to building the scientific and...
Dear all, We are currently conducting a SQUEAC investigation in two townships of the Northern Rakhine State in Myanmar. We have been doing well so far but we are now facing a...
View this article as a pdf By Kevin PQ Phelan Kevin PQ Phelan is Nutrition Advisor at ALIMA, the Alliance for International Medical Action based in Paris. Before joining...
By Adrienne Daudet and Carlos Navarro-Colorado Morlaï, cured at home, at last weekly visit. Adrienne Daudet is an agronomist and has an MA in anthropology. She has four years...
By Sophie Woodhead, Jose Luis Alvarez Moran, Anne Leavens, Modibo Traore, Anna Horner, Saul Guerrero Based within the ACF-UK Operations Team, Sophie Woodhead coordinates all...
Summary of evaluation1 Young girl recovering from severe malnutrition, OTP centre in Kaedi, Mauritania By Yvonne Grellety, Hélène Schwartz and David Rizzi Yvonne Grellety is...
By Ben Allen, Mark Myatt, Nikki Williamson, Danka Pantchova and Hassan Ali Ahmed Ben Allen has been Global Coverage Advisor for Action Against Hunger UK for the past two...
View this article as a pdf Summary of research1 By Naoko Kozuki, Jama Mohamud Ahmed, Mukhtar Sirat and Muna Abdirizak Jama Naoko Kozuki is the Health Research Adviser for...
FEX: From the editor
This issue of Field Exchange gives extended coverage to a briefing paper just released by Oxfam and SC UK on the 2011 response to the Horn of Africa crisis. This paper argues...
FEX: Community management of uncomplicated malnourished infants under six months old: barriers to national policy change
By Sonja Read and Marie McGrath View this article as a pdf Sonja Read is a public health nutritionist and was lead researcher (ENN consultant) on the project. Marie McGrath...
Summary of panel discussion1 Alice Obrecht of ALNAP moderated this session. Panellists were Gwen Luc of Action Against Hunger (AAH) Link Nutrition Causal Analysis (NCA)...
FEX: Delivering treatment of SAM at scale: lessons learned and forward looking for the Nigeria CMAM programme
By Amy Mayberry and Claire Harbron (CIFF), Arjan De Wagt (UNICEF) and Dr. Chris Osa Isokpunwu (FMOH) Amy Mayberry is on the Children's Investment Fund Foundation's (CIFF)...
By Muriele Therry Muriele Therry studied ethnology at Masters level. After two missions with ACF, one year in Sakhalin as food security officer and 6 months in Afghanistan as...
By Stephanie Stern and Melchior de Roquemaurel Stephanie Stern leads the Action Against Hunger LAB project which aims to reinforce the impact and uptake of knowledge. Before...
Summary of position paper1 Action Against Hunger | ACF International has recently produced a position paper on the role of products in the treatment and prevention of global...
FEX: The REFANI Project in Pakistan: adapting research to a multi-sectoral programme for impact measurement
By Zvia Shwirtz, Bridget Fenn, Riccardo Mioli, Ghulam Murtaza Sangrasi and Maureen Gallagher Zvia Shwirtz is currently the REFANI Communications and Research Uptake Officer,...
Summary of meeting abstract1 Children participate in the obligatory 'appetite' taste for RUTF Since Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) changed its treatment approach from...
Reference this page
Naomi Cosgrove, Jane Earland, Philip James, Aurélie Rozet, Mathias Grossiord and Cecile Salpeteur (2012). Qualitative review of an alternative treatment of SAM in Myanmar. Field Exchange 42, January 2012. p6. www.ennonline.net/fex/42/qualitative