Menu ENN Search

Gender impact analysis of unconditional cash transfers in south central Somalia

Summary of published research1

A woman tiedyes clothing

Location: Somalia

What we know already: Cash transfer programming can positively impact on nutrition and food security.

What this article adds: In challenging contexts, with good management, unconditional cash transfers can have a positive impact on gender relations, mental health and may have longer term impact on coping mechanisms.

Wide-scale cash transfer programming was implemented by the Cash Consortium (amongst others) from September 2011 onwards, after the first famine of the 21st century was announced in Somalia. Prolonged conflict and drought created a humanitarian crisis that put 2.85 million people in need of food aid and other basic necessities, the majority (61%) of whom resided in South- Central Somalia. Many of the affected population also fled to urban centres and this created large internally displaced people (IDP) camps in the capital of Mogadishu. As a result, the Cash Consortium organisations targeted four regions in South Central Somalia, all of which had been identified by the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU) as in need of emergency assistance. The areas were: IDP camps in Mogadishu, targeted by the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) and Action Contre la Faim (ACF), Lower Juba and Gedo was covered by Adeso – African Development Solutions, (formerly Horn Relief) and in Hiran, programmes were implemented by Save the Children.

The South Central region of Somalia continues to face challenges in terms of equality between women and men. Maternal mortality in Somalia is amongst the highest in the world, female genital mutilation/ cutting (FGM/C) rates remain extremely high (98%) and female nutrition is notoriously worse than that of men (UNICEF Statistics, 2010). Gender-based violence is reportedly high, although solid data are difficult to come across.

In recognition of certain knowledge gaps concerning the appropriateness and impact of implementing unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) at scale in Somalia, the Cash Consortium commissioned four research studies in 2012. One of the studies set out to assess the impact of cash on gender relations within the household as well as on the wider community with respect to coping mechanisms, social status and levels of conflict and violence.

The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data collection tools, including eight focus group discussions, 109 questionnaires and 31 interviews. In total, 204 beneficiaries in South Central Somalia were consulted.

Key findings

Gender consideration in humanitarian contexts is possible and despite challenging operating environments, feasible and realistic measures to improve beneficiary protection can be included in UCT planning and implementation. Approaches include engaging the community in sensitisation on targeting criteria, creating a flexible complaints procedure (for example, a hotline where beneficiaries can text or call in), ensuring staff and community members of both genders are involved in selecting beneficiaries and conducting post-distribution monitoring, limiting the time spent in travelling to cash distribution centres, limiting the visibility of beneficiaries as recipients of cash (by mobile UCT transfers) and enabling beneficiaries to have the cash collected by someone they trust (if necessary).

Some beneficiaries self-reported (without prompt) improvements in specific areas of mental health, and said they experienced “higher morale” and felt “less depressed.” The findings show that social status increased for both women and men, but only along gendered lines. For example, women felt more included in social functions, while men felt more included in religious functions. Certain populations saw the greatest gains in social status. These were (in order of the importance of the proportional change): widowed and divorced beneficiaries, agropastoralists, agriculturalists, IDPs in camps, older recipients and women in general.

Beneficiaries increased their capacity to give qaaraan as a result of the cash transfer. This type of sharing was a traditional coping mechanism and protective factor that increased resilience in the face of future adversity. However, women experienced less opportunity to gain social status through giving qaaraan as the re-distribution of wealth (particularly to extended family) was mainly the job of men.

Female headed households, who were outside normative and hegemonic power structures such as marriage, can expect to gain proportionally more social status from UCTs as they hold greater control over the re-distribution of wealth and giving of qaaraan. Interestingly, the greatest shift in attitudes on women’s ability to manage cash occurred in IDP camps, where there are a large number of female headed households.

Beneficiaries reported an increase in their perceived risk of theft (18%), and risk of taxation (9%). While perceptions of risk increased, actual incidences were not clearly reported (though it is very difficult to report on such sensitive issues).

Polygamous households, in which only one wife received cash, were more likely to experience intra-household conflict, and ‘splitting’ the cash in a polygamous household may not be feasible or appropriate. As a result, there is a need to consider how UCT programmers will approach the targeting of polygamous households in the future.

Within the household, there was overwhelming agreement (95%) on the use of cash and very little reported conflict. Beneficiaries said that the cash created peace and harmony within the household and wider community, as hunger and malnutrition and the pressures of daily life were lessened. A significant factor in maintaining peace was the involvement of the Voluntary Relief Committees (VRCs) and community members.

The sensitisation of the community on targeting criteria was successful and 98% of beneficiaries surveyed knew why they had been targeted. Targeting female beneficiaries was overwhelmingly accepted by the community and women were seen as the ‘rightful’ beneficiaries of UCTs. This was closely linked to seeing women as the household managers and to binary distinctions between ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ spending.

The majority of beneficiaries (78%) said that women and men have different priorities in their spending of UCTs. This was backed by findings that female beneficiaries spend twice as much on school fees than male beneficiaries. There was solid evidence that women in urban areas (within Gedo and Hiran, but not Mogadishu) spent more on education. IDPs in camps were least likely to spend on school fees. This may be a result of the increasing number of free IDP schools, which may be enabling beneficiaries to spend their cash in other areas, such as food and livestock.

Women were said to be in control of spending on small and daily items. The belief that the cash was a relatively small amount (around $100) and intended for household expenditure ensured that women continued to control the cash unchallenged.

There was some evidence that the cash may contribute to long term outcomes that may prove transformative to gender relations. Although the main objective of the cash was to save lives and sustain the most vulnerable, some beneficiaries were able to use the cash to invest in long-term productive assets, such as purchasing goats or starting small businesses. Potentially transformative to gender relations was the use of cash to increase women’s bargaining power and access to credit, reduce debts, decrease the migration of men for work and increase the time fathers spent with children.

This study shows that gender consideration in humanitarian situations is possible, despite challenging operating environments as is the case in South Central Somalia. The study also shows that many changes were gendered, but not all. Ensuring programmes consider the varying needs of different populations is crucial to minimising the risks that are specific to cash transfers, thereby improving positive outcomes for all.

Show footnotes

1Wasilkowska. K (2012). Gender impact analysis. Unconditional cash transfers in south central Somalia. The Somalia Cash Consortium. 21st December 2012

2The Cash Consortium is a group of four NGOs (ACF, Adeso, DRC and Save the Children) that came together in mid-2011 to coordinate their aid response to the huge humanitarian needs in South Central Somalia. The Cash Consortium has had a clear emergency mandate from the start; the overall aim of the Food Assistance for Vulnerable Households in South Central Somalia project is to meet basic food and nonfood needs, through the provision of unconditional cash grants. In 2011-2012, the Cash Consortium provided between 6 and 9 monthly cash transfers to over 40,000 households in the regions of Hiran, Gedo, Lower Juba and Mogadishu.

More like this

FEX: What affects the cost of delivering cash transfers in humanitarian settings?

By Clare O'Brien and Fidelis Hove Clare O'Brien is a senior consultant in the Poverty and Social Protection team at Oxford Policy Management, a development...

FEX: Child outcomes of cash transfer programmes in humanitarian and development contexts

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Cash transfer programmes (CTPs) have a proven impact on poverty reduction and social protection but their overall impact...

FEX: Gatekeepers in Mogadishu

Summary of report1 Summary prepared by Dina Sinigallia. Report authors: Erik Bryld and Dina Sinigallia (Tanya Copenhagen), Christine Kamau (iDC) Mogadishu Location:...

en-net: Potential Negative Impacts of Cash Transfers on Nutrition Status

Dear All I am looking for information on the potential negative impacts of cash transfers on the nutrition status. I would grateful if you can share with me...

FEX: Addressing urban food security through electronic cash transfer in Kenya

By Sumananjali Mohanty Sumananjali Mohanty has been working with Oxfam Kenya programme for the past four and half years, initially as the Urban Food Security and...

FEX: IRC cash and livelihoods support programme in Lebanon

By Francesca Battistin Francesca Battistin leads the International Rescue Committee (IRC) cash assistance and livelihoods recovery interventions in Lebanon. She has a...

FEX: Food, goats and cash for assets programmes during emergency drought response inKenya

By Geoff Brouwer Geoff Brouwer worked as a research and communications consultant for World Renew-formerly the Christian Reformed World Relief Committee (CRWRC) - in Kenya...

FEX: Cash-based intervention and risk of acute malnutrition among children in internally displaced persons camps in Somalia

Research snapshot1 Cash-based interventions (CBI) have been used in Somalia since 2011, a country with one of the highest prevalences of acute child malnutrition in the world....

FEX: Child Development Grant Programme (CDGP) in northern Nigeria: influencing nutrition-sensitive social policy programming in Jigawa State

By Fatima Adamu, Maureen Gallagher and Paul Xavier Thangarasa Lisez cet article en français ici Fatima Adamu is the Communication Officer for Action Against Hunger...

FEX: Sectoral integration ‘on the cheap’ with cash based programming

By Holly Welcome Radice Holly Welcome Radice has worked for 15 years in food security programming in Africa and Latin America. She was the Head of Food Security and...

FEX: Doing cash differently: how cash transfers can transform humanitarian aid

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Humanitarian aid is increasingly provided in the form of cash assistance. Unconditional and multi-purpose cash programming...

FEX: Nutrition security emergency programming in diverse urban contexts

By Marie Sardier, Joanna Friedman, Maureen Gallagher and Julien Jacob Marie Sardier is Food Security and Livelihoods Advisor with Action contre la Faim (ACF) in Paris...

FEX: Adapting a resilience improvement programme in conflict: Experiences from Yemen

By Mustafa Ghulam and Mohammed H Alshama'a Lisez cet article en français ici Mustafa Ghulam is a Food Security and Livelihoods Progamme Manger with Save the Children,...

FEX: Swaziland Cash and Food Transfer Programme

By Rosie Jackson Rosie Jackson currently works for Save the Children UK as an Emergency Food Security & Livelihoods Advisor. Based in London, she provides technical support to...

FEX: Emergency Food Security and Livelihoods Project in Amhara and Oromia regions

By Sarah Coll-Black and Matt Hobson Sarah Coll-Black is a Social Protection Specialist working with the World Bank in Ethiopia and Kenya. She has been involved with Ethiopia's...

FEX: Food insecurity and mental health among community health volunteers in Ethiopia

By Sarah Coll-Black and Matt Hobson Sarah Coll-Black is a Social Protection Specialist working with the World Bank in Ethiopia and Kenya. She has been involved with Ethiopia's...

FEX: Literature review on impact of cash transfers on nutritional outcomes

By Bridget Fenn and Ellyn Yakowenko Bridget Fenn is an epidemiologist with a background in nutrition. She is currently a consultant for the Emergency Nutrition Network (ENN)...

FEX: A cluster RCT to measure the effectiveness of cash-based interventions on nutrition status, Sindh Province, Pakistan

By Bridget Fenn View this article as a pdf Bridget Fenn is an epidemiologist with a background in nutrition. She is currently a consultant for the Emergency Nutrition Network...

FEX: DRC experiences of cash assistance to non-camp refugees in Lebanon and Turkey

By Louisa Seferis Louisa is the MENA Regional Livelihoods & Cash Advisor for the Danish Refugee Council (DRC). She has worked for three years with the DRC for the Syrian...

FEX: Upcoming research shared at ACF research conference

At the ACF research conference, November 6th, 2016, experiences were shared from a number of studies where final results will be made available in 2017. A snapshot of what to...

Close

Reference this page

Gender impact analysis of unconditional cash transfers in south central Somalia. Field Exchange 45, May 2013. p18. www.ennonline.net/fex/45/gender

(ENN_4374)

Close

Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.