Menu ENN Search

Something for everyone: three perspectives from a recent coverage assessment in Pakistan

Summary of review1

Lady Health Worker and her husband (teacher) working as volunteers

Interview by Saul Guerrero, ACF

Action Against Hunger, in collaboration with the Coverage Monitoring Network (CMN) Project, UNICEF Pakistan and the Nutrition Cluster and its partners, recently carried out a coverage assessment in one of its supported CMAM programmes in Sindh Province, Pakistan. The assessment, supported by Mark Myatt (independent consultant), served to provide on-the-job training on the SQUEAC method to a mixed group of non-governmental organisation (NGO) and UN staff. But what was the experience of doing a coverage assessment like for ACF staff at programme, country and HQ level? We asked them how their view of the programme has changed since the assessment and which parts of the process they would like to see integrated into their way of working.

  How has the SQUEAC changed the way you now look at the programme? Which part of the process are you most interested in seeing continue routinely?

Shahid Fazal, ACF Nutrition Coordinator, Pakistan

This new methodology has changed our way of thinking and has proven that evaluation of nutrition programmes can be done on a routine basis along with timely reforms. We get a clear insight into the barriers and can recognise the actual contribution of specific ‘boosters’1. It is like turning the stone upside down and going deeper into programme planning and implementation modalities. The tally sheets give a wonderful glance at the trends of quality indicators such as mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on admission, travel times, admissions and exits over time. Incorporating some of these indicators (along with the more common Length Of Stay and Average Weight Gain) will give us a qualitative image of the programme on a weekly/monthly basis.

Chris Golden, ACF Deputy Country Director, Pakistan

The SQUEAC methodology, and Mark [Myatt] as a presenter, makes a persuasive case to reconsider our existing assessments and gives a new appraisal of what they teach us, but also what they don’t reveal due to their structure and often limited focus. I would say this process has definitely opened the eyes of many of the people who participated in it. The process provided the teams not only with training on the methodology of SQUEAC but also with good advice on implementing thorough assessments that will produce robust results.

Cecile Basquin, ACF Nutrition Advisor, USA

Prior to the SQUEAC investigation in T.M. Khan district, it was difficult to evaluate how efficient our community mobilisation approach was. Now we know that the work of Community Volunteers is acting as an important booster to access. This SQUEAC exercise allowed us to identify what works and therefore gave us confidence we can replicate the approach. Very impor- tantly, we also learned about pro- gramme areas that need to be stren- gthened or improved, and resulted in programmatic recommendations and concrete actions points. The SQUEAC analysis has led the team to have a more critical view on their work and now they have a different way of looking at routine CMAM data. The reflection that was done while building the hypothesis about coverage (Stage 1) is definitely something that should be done on a more regular basis and with all team members. Doing this ‘brainstorming’ continuously with the key determinants of coverage in mind and having this critical way of thinking regularly, is likely to contribute to increased quality and coverage, so we can only encourage it.

Show footnotes

1See field article in this issue ‘Boosters, Barriers, Questions: an approach to organising and analysing SQUEAC data’.

More like this

FEX: Community weighting of barriers and boosters in Democratic Republic of Congo

By Lenka Blanárová, Sophie Woodhead and Mark Myatt Lenka Blanárová is a Community Mobilisation Advisor at ACF-UK, supporting nutrition programmes...

en-net: Recovering case

Hello Everyone, Could someone help me understand why in the circumstance described below we consider the child in the "recovering case group" while conducting a SQUEAC...

en-net: SQUEAC Coverage survey

We did 2 SQUEAC coverage assessments recently and I have confused with something with in it 1. What is the difference between Alpha and Beta prior ? What is Alpha and Beta...

en-net: 2nd SQUEAC Planning

Hi,

We are planning to conduct SQUEAC investigation of CMAM program which is about to end in Dec 2016. Last SQUEAC survey was conducted in 2015 for which the results...

en-net: Causality Analysis

Does someone know where I can get resources or information on experiences and standard design for conducting causal analysis of malnutrition?

Hello,

as far as I know,...

FEX: Boosters, Barriers, Questions: an approach to organising and analysing SQUEAC data

By Andrew Prentice (VALID), Balegamire Safari Joseph (VALID), Esther Ogonda McOyoo (Concern), Faith Manee Nzidka (ACF), Hassan Ali Ahmed (Mercy USA), Jackson N Chege (Islamic...

en-net: Low OTP Coverage

I have just concluded a SQUEAC Coverage Assessment in one of the Districts in Marsabit County, Kenya and found an OTP Coverage of 20.2%. This is quite low and even below the...

en-net: Advertisement

Terms of Reference Purpose To Design, Implement and Support Capacity Development of Nutrition Coverage Assessment using the SQUEAC Methodology Location Daynile, Dollow,...

en-net: SQUEAC, when CMAM program ends

Dear All, 1. Just want to know & guidance please, can we conduct SQUEAC in a district where program ended few months ago? though all program records are available. 2. If...

FEX: Is there a systematic bias in estimates of programme coverage returned by SQUEAC coverage assessments?

Lisez cet article en français ici This is a poscript for research article 'Is there a systematic bias in estimates of programme coverage returned by SQUEAC coverage...

en-net: Qualitative stage 1(SQUEAC) for both OTP and SFP

We are conducting SQUEAC for IMAM programme coverage in Garbatulla sub County, we realised that same barriers in previous SQUEAC conducted in 2013 resurfaced again during the...

FEX: Sampling in insecure environments: Field experiences from coverage assessments in Afghanistan

By Ben Allen, Mark Myatt, Nikki Williamson, Danka Pantchova and Hassan Ali Ahmed Ben Allen has been Global Coverage Advisor for Action Against Hunger UK for the past two...

en-net: Geographical area for coverage survey

I am planning a SQUEAC survey in Haiti. Our PTAs are spread through 5 Communes (Provinces) which are relatively close together. The problem is that in the middle of this 5...

en-net: Cox's Bazar Refugee Settlements: Coverage assessment methodology

Hello,
I am supporting partners with assessing the coverage of OTP and TSFP in the Rohingya camps in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.

In August 2018, the camps (35 in...

en-net: SQUEAC survey consultant - Concern Worldwide - South Sudan

Concern Worldwide is looking for a consultant to carry out a SQUEAC survey in Aweil West and North in South Sudan.

Terms of Reference

1. Background
The...

en-net: Stage 3 - Sample size issue - Help

Dear all, We are currently conducting a SQUEAC investigation in two townships of the Northern Rakhine State in Myanmar. We have been doing well so far but we are now facing a...

en-net: Coverage estimate calculation - Final stage - Help again

Dear all, I hope you are doing fine. Well, I still have an issue and need a bit of guidance. We are in the very final stage of the SQUEAC investigation. I have just compiled...

en-net: SQUEAC - Weighted boosters and barriers

I have tried to check different SQUEAC investigation reports. I am observing inconsistencies in weighing and scoring system. Regardless of the number of boosters and barriers,...

FEX: Remote monitoring of CMAM programmes coverage: SQUEAC lessons in Mali and Mauritania

By Jose Luis Alvarez Moran, Brian Mac Domhnaill and Saul Guerrero Jose Luis Alvarez Moran is a Medical Doctor with a PhD in International and Public Health. He works as an...

en-net: Using a SQUEAC for BSFP coverage assessment?

I'm looking into common practices/guidance around assessing programmatic coverage for Blanket Supplementary Feeding Programs (BSFPs). I read conflicting views of the use of...

Close

Reference this page

Saul Guerrero (2013). Something for everyone: three perspectives from a recent coverage assessment in Pakistan. Field Exchange 45, May 2013. p39. www.ennonline.net/fex/45/something

(ENN_4393)

Close

Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.