Menu ENN Search

Food distribution in Mandera district (Kenya)

By Manuel Duce-Marques

The author, Manuel Duce-Marques is a qualified nurse who spent several years working for MSF Spain in Mandera District, Northeast Kenya. He has just recently graduated with an MSc in Human Nutrition from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Mandera is one of three districts in the North-eastern Province of Kenya. It is an area prone to drought and food insecurity and has a population of 131,000 with 37,900 estimated as living in Central Mandera. The district is geographically isolated and has weak links with other districts. Its people are ethnic Somalis who are traditionally nomadic pastoralists but now fall more into the category of agro-pastoralists as they practice some cultivation of staple crops - maize and beans. Central Mandera has been a settlement for Somali refugees since 1991 and about 10,000 of these refugees still live in the former refugee camps which are now considered official locations. During the severe drought of 1991-2 livestock holdings were drastically reduced so that many families became destitute and were forced to migrate to Central Mandera.

Between 1994-6 there were three successive rain failures in the district. However, despite a worsening 'alert' status* in the district, indicated by the Arid Lands Resource Management early warning system and a series of MSF nutritional surveys, the Kenyan government was reluctant to declare an emergency. MSF Spain, who were initially contacted by a local NGO in March 1996 because of its concerns about the plight of pastoralists in the district, attempted to convince the Kenyan government, UN agencies (WFP) and other NGOs in Nairobi to mount an emergency food intervention. This advocacy did not prove effective. In May 1996, MSF recorded a 32.4% prevalence of malnutrition in Mandera. An emergency was not officially declared until February '97, and therefore no request for emergency food aid was made until this date. In response to the deteriorating situation in Mandera, MSF took the decision to step outside its usual mandate and implement a general food distribution programme. An MSF team already present in the area was given the task of designing and implementing the programme although they had no prior experience of this type of intervention. It was hoped that this would encourage other organisations, with experience of general food distribution, to take over the programme.

Registration

The main objective of carrying out a registration was to obtain 'reliable' figures for planning the general ration distribution. Beneficiary numbers obtained from other sources were often contradictory and believed to be inflated. Two different types of registration procedure were selected for Fino division and Central Mandera.

Central Mandera

The population in Central Mandera (about 37,900 people) consisted of displaced persons and refugees/returnees. It was clear that not everybody was equally affected by the drought so that there were different levels of food insecurity. It was therefore necessary to establish criteria for who should or should not be registered for the general ration distribution.

After some consideration, it was decided to target ration cards to families with a malnourished child in one of the feeding centres (although it was recognised that this may not necessarily target the most food insecure families as malnutrition may be related to disease or poor caring practices). This led to an immediate increase in admissions to the feeding centres. While this could be construed as an advantage as feeding centre coverage improved, in part the increase was due to cheating by registering the same child more than once and by staff succumbing to community pressures to admit children who did not fit the criteria. It also created negative consequences within the centres, e.g. overcrowding resulting in increased risk of cross infection, reduced staff / beneficiary ratio, reduced quality of supervision and increased levels of dissatisfaction among mothers, leading to an increased proportion of defaulters. As the situation ran out of control, the distribution of ration cards was stopped. MSF could not find a way around the problem of over-registration and ration cards were not distributed again. The total number of ration cards which had been distributed were about 3,000, which corresponded to a population coverage of 18,000.

Fino division

In Fino division it was decided to implement a full registration (once off) for the entire population. To reduce the potential for multiple registration, the exercise was carried out simultaneously on one day for the 7 villages close to Somalia and on the following day for the 8 villages close to Ethiopia. The total number of ration cards distributed was 7,698 which was equivalent to 26,900 beneficiaries.

Registration Process

Resources

After planning a rough schedule for the registration and obtaining agreement with the community, the programme had to be postponed for two months until the resources became available. All the telecommunications material (radios) needed for the security of the teams 'disappeared' in the Nairobi customs. This, plus the bureaucratic red-tape that had to be negotiated to get all the material back, added to the anxiety and impatience amongst locals and increased pressure on our (MSF) teams as well as their own frustration at the delays.

Timing

As some of the registration points were close to Somalia and Ethiopia, it was decided to inform leaders of the communities only a few days in advance about the registration day to avoid artificial movements of population from neighbouring countries and within Kenya itself. It was recognised that this might have prevented some legitimate groups from registering but was still considered necessary to ensure effective targeting of resources. However, in spite of this precaution, the two month's delay allowed small new villages to spring up around locations which were scheduled to be included in the registration.

System used

Families were made to sit in lines and wait some distance away from the registration point. Community leaders would send a few families at a time to the clerks to avoid overcrowding. During the registration process, every member of the family put one finger in highly concentrated Gentian Violet (GV) to indicate ration card receipt thereby avoiding double registration. However, the main problem was that a very similar method was used in the elections in Kenya and people knew very well how to clean off the dye. Before registration they greased their fingers with coconut oil and afterwards they cleaned the GV with fuel and lemon. It was obvious that the plan had to be changed. Chiefs were therefore asked to gather all the population in one place early in the morning where each member of the family would be given a piece of paper with an MSF stamp on it (this was difficult to duplicate). The paper would then be collected during registration. This proved to be a far more effective method than the previous one.

Registration form

Ration cards serve the dual purpose of ensuring that the beneficiary receives the food and also facilitates control over the distribution.

The information on the ration card was rewritten in a register: card number, name of the head of family, number of dependants, number of children under five and number of pregnant and lactating women. MUAC measurements of all the children under 5 were initially undertaken but this led to crowding and confusion, so the practice was stopped.

Security

Registration of large numbers of people at one point can take a long time. As the day wears on discomfort for beneficiaries and programme implementors increases. Therefore minimum conditions of security are needed to ensure success. Responsibility for security was given to the chief of each location. They were given information about how the registration would be carried out and the roles of the various people involved. In addition, the community of each location was responsible for ensuring that the registration point was kept 'intact'. They would often prepare fences around the site made with bushes. In the few locations where different clans were represented there would often be a dominant group who influenced the proceedings, trying to register favoured persons more than once. This would lead to mounting tensions (in rare cases leading to violence) and sometimes we could not finish the registration which probably meant that the most vulnerable families (who were likely to be last in the queues) did not receive the ration cards.

Conclusion

General Ration Distribution

Two members of MSF came especially to take charge of the food distribution in Fino Division. However everybody in the team was involved; the field co-ordinator was in charge of all negotiations with local government and other players, the MSF administrator was in charge of buying food items and renting all the cars and lorries, the logistician for the feeding centres was in charge of the storage of the food. Distribution was directed to the family unit. A family member collected the ration at a distribution point. The family ration was measured by volume by MSF staff using scoops after presentation and verification of the ration card. The card was stamped and marked for each item collected by making a hole in a specific place. The ration consisted of 4.5 kg of maize, 3 kg of beans, and 1 kg of oil per person per month, which was equivalent to 1100 Kcal/day. In addition to these basic commodities, 7.5 Kg of a blended food (UNIMIX), was included for children under five years of age and pregnant and lactating women. This contributed a further 1000 Kcal/day. The ration was set at this level based on the theoretical quantity required and what was feasible at field level, given resource and logistical constraints. A local teacher from each distribution point was trained to teach mothers about the correct preparation of the UNIMIX.

Central Mandera

The first distribution was carried out at the end of November. The distribution points were the supplementary feeding centres. Food distributions were carried out once a month. To prevent families trying to collect the food at more than one feeding centre, the distribution was carried out in all three centres at the same time. In view of the fact that it would be easy to exaggerate numbers in a family a standard ration card for 6 members was distributed to beneficiaries. Feeding centre staff did the distribution. However as they were part of the community they were prone to giving more food to members of their own tribe. Plans were therefore made to move staff from one centre
to another, but as it happened this was not necessary as our capacity to control staff activities improved.

Fino Division

In most cases there was one distribution point for each location which minimised both the number of people who attended any distribution at one time and the distance travelled to load the food. Because of the large number of distribution points and the logistic capacity the distribution was carried out monthly. The food needed for Fino division for one month was about 350 tons, ranging from 2 to 35 tons for the different locations.

Distribution Procedure

Staff

The distribution staff consisted of the 2 expatriates, 20 local MSF staff and between 4-6 watchmen. There were also loaders from the local area.

Distribution point

The recipient community waited some distance away from the distribution point to minimise overcrowding around the distribution point. The structure of the distribution centre was made from wood and was located close to some existing local infrastructure (e.g. school, etc.). On the day of the distribution a plastic sheet was placed on the roof to protect the team from the sun. The simple structure allowed for crowd control and there was one entrance and one exit. Two lines of people were served in parallel. Each line required one clerk to check the cards with the register books; 1-2 people to distribute each commodity and 1 supervisor. One expatriate staff member remained with the clerk with another at the end of the chain.

Food losses

A small percentage of losses (around 10%) was considered acceptable. However, commodities of high value (e.g. oil), were more likely to disappear. Food losses occurred for a variety of reasons:

Security

As there is no physical or controlled border with Somalia, Mandera town and the border areas are considered to be unsafe. Bandits regularly make raids on Kenyan territory. The risk of attack by Somali groups during the distribution was therefore very high. MSF policy on security was very clear, i.e. not paying for security and not enlisting armed guards for MSF vehicles (with the exception of Somalia). Insecurity presented a number of problems for the programme.

  1. Security during the distribution was the responsibility of the local chief/traditional authority of each location. Their duty was to negotiate with local government to obtain enough security to guarantee a safe distribution. MSF stressed that at the first sign of insecurity, distribution would be stopped. In most cases the distribution system worked very well, but in a few locations after the relatives of the local leaders had received their rations, their interest in the efficient functioning of the distribution system waned and powerful individuals were able to take more food than they were entitled to leading to beneficiary dissatisfaction and unrest. MSF were then forced to withdraw. MSF´s policy of abandoning an area under these conditions, sometimes led to undermining the power of some corrupt leaders. MSF would return the following month to try again and the community would attempt to change the leadership to ensure more secure future distributions.
  2. MSF decided to start without any protection for the food convoys. However, following a number of attacks by bandits coming from Somalia on vehicles, the decision was taken to stop the distribution of food until local government could provide, at their own costs, the security necessary to guarantee us the distribution. This was explained to the leaders at all the locations who also informed local government. This was a shock for the government as all other organisations in the area (including UN agencies) paid for this service. After three weeks of discussions (and no distribution) MSF and local government arrived at an agreement. Local government paid for police protection and each of the local ministries in Mandera agreed to provide cars with petrol. However, these measures created their own problems e.g. often the car didn't have petrol, difficulties in finding the person to authorise the payment for the petrol, cars arriving late etc. Due to the high level of insecurity in the area and frequency of theft, we were advised the cars had to be rented in the same location. These cars were in a bad condition and needed constant attention.

Other problems

Main Findings

Our experience showed that a certain level of food losses was inevitable and that powerful, well connected households often received more than their fair share of the ration, usually at the expense of the weak and vulnerable. Security and monitoring mechanisms could reduce some of these abuses but we were forced to be realistic about the extent to which we could effect change. Some leaders forced households to pay to them a part of the ration received. We did not attempt to interfere with this practice. We learned many lessons about how to improve the efficacy and equity of the food distribution system, but came to realise that there were certain aspects of the distribution chain over which we had only limited control. While the objective of providing the general ration was to ensure nutritional well-being, it was clear that a number of households sold the food and therefore used the food as an income transfer, which allowed expenditure on non-food items. This created disappointment amongst some expatriate staff who assumed that the beneficiaries would eat all of what was provided. While, from my point of view, this exchange of rations can be acceptable and sometimes necessary, the process can also be inefficient as the money/goods exchanged for the food is less than the monetary equivalent of its nutritional value.

The two expatriates in charge of the organisation of the general food distribution in Fino division were very frustrated by the fact that they were mainly involved in the arduous tasks of policing the distribution rather than acting as logisticians.

The MSF team were too focused on the process of controlling the delivery of food and therefore paid insufficient attention to monitoring what happened with the food at household level. This made it difficult to fully assess the impact of the programme, e.g. what food ended up in the household.

We believed from the start that it was very important to involve all the actors in the area (local authorities, government, the community, UN agencies and other NGOs) in the programme. If resources are limited (as they were in this case), then it is even more important that local government contribute resources within their capacity.

Show footnotes

*"indicators show unusual fluctuations outside expected seasonal ranges, and asset levels of households are too low to provide an adequate subsistence level and vulnerability to food insecurity is still high".

More like this

FEX: Supplementary Feeding in Mandera: The Right Intervention?

View of the Mandera Camp Lourdes-Vazquez-Garcia worked for MSF Spain in the Mandera feeding centres during the period covered by this article. She subsequently qualified with...

FEX: MSF experiences from Afghanistan: Maslakh camp

by Saskia van der Kam Saskia van der Kam is the headquarters nutritionist in MSF Holland. This article draws on her field trips to Afghanistan and a number of other MSF Field...

FEX: Practical challenges of evaluating BSFP in northern Kenya

Summary of published study1 Beneficiaries of BSFP in Kenya A mass or ‘blanket’ supplementary feeding programme (BSFP) was implemented by the World Food Programme (WFP) and...

FEX: WFP e-voucher programme in Lebanon

By Ekram Mustafa El-Huni Ekram Mustafa El-Huni is WFP's Head of Programmes in Beirut, Lebanon. She has worked in a variety of roles with WFP at the headquarters, regional...

FEX: Principles and Practice for Food Distribution in Conflict

Summary of Published Review Field Exchange 10 highlighted a study underway by the Humanitarian Policy Group and Nutrition Works on the principles and practice for food...

FEX: The Role of Women in Food Management

The author of this article is Zhara Mirghani with assistance from Rita Bhatia. Rita is the senior nutritionist in the Professional and Technical Support Services of UNHCR....

FEX: WFP evaluation of emergency operation in Sudan

Fasher-Kabkabiya and Kutum-Fasher, Dafur Summary of evaluation1 The World Food Programme (WFP) recently published an evaluation of their general food distribution programme...

FEX: Delivery of Social Protection Programmes in Kenya

By Clemensia Mwiti and Nupur Kukrety Clemensia Mwiti is a Humanitarian Support Professional (HSP) in Emergency Food Security and Livelihoods. Nupur Kukrety is the Social...

FEX: Reflections on food and nutrition interventions in Huambo

By Lola Goselow This article is based on a field trip made by Lola Gostelow (SCF HQ emergency advisor) to the SCF programme in Huambo province, Angola in November 1999. The...

FEX: Concern’s Initial Response to the Kosovo Crisis

Delivering WFP wheat to the CONCERN store in Gjimij Connell Foley is part of the Concern Policy Development and Evaluation Directorate and went to Albania as part of Concern's...

FEX: The Use of BP-5 Biscuits in Supplementary Feeding Programmes

Fitsum Assafa MSF, Nutritionist, Jalalabad, (Dec 1995-April 1996) Peshawar 1996 MSF has been involved in giving emergency medical/nutritional assistance to Sarshahi and New...

FEX: The Targeted Supplementary Feeding Programme (TSF)

By Jutta Neitzel TSF distribution in Degehabur, Somali Region Jutta Neitzel is the Head of the Nutrition and Education Section at WFP Ethiopia. She has worked for the...

FEX: Determining eligibility (Special Supplement 1)

Children are often a group targeted in emergencies Eligibility criteria, i.e. the characteristics of those individuals or households to be targeted with food, arise from the...

FEX: Monitoring the targeting system (Special Supplement 1)

In the past, little emphasis has been placed on monitoring what happens to food aid after it has reached the distribution point. Donor reporting has been limited to the...

FEX: Comparing cash and food transfers: findings from a pilot project in Sri Lanka

By Lili Mohiddin (Oxfam GB), Manohar Sharma (IFPRI), Anette Haller (WFP Rome) Lili Mohiddin, Manohar Sharma & Anette Haller Lili Mohiddin has been an Emergency Food Security...

FEX: Community - based targeting in Kenya

Summary of evaluation1 At the end of 2002, an evaluation of community based targeted distributions (CBTD) of general rations was carried out in Kenya, in order to derive...

FEX: Mastercard experiences during the humanitarian response in southern Europe

By Paul Musser and Sasha Kapadia View this article as a pdf Paul Musser is Senior Vice President of Humanitarian, Development & Donors, Mastercard. Paul Musser leads the team...

FEX: Nutrition causal analysis: planning and credible advocacy

By Paul Rees-Thomas Based primarily in Eastern Europe and the Horn of Africa, Paul Rees- Thomas worked for five years with Action Contre Le Faim (ACF), latterly in the food...

FEX: Chronic Malnutrition: a Problem not Addressed by SFPs

An Appeal for a Development Programme by MSF Spain in Mandera District, Kenya The chronic nutritional emergency in Central Mandera, north east Kenya, was the subject of an...

FEX: Constraints to achieving Sphere minimum standards for SFPs in West Darfur: a comparative analysis

A view of Mornei camp The current conflict in Sudan's westernmost state of Darfur began in early 2003, although most humanitarian agencies only gained access to the area and...

Close

Reference this page

Manuel Duce-Marques (1998). Food distribution in Mandera district (Kenya). Field Exchange 5, October 1998. p9. www.ennonline.net/fex/5/food