Links between household agricultural production and nutrition
Summary of research1
Location: Nigeria, Uganda, Ethiopia, Zambia, Mozambique, Tanzania and Nepal
What we know: It is generally accepted that agricultural development will improve household food and nutrition security but direct evidence of pathways is lacking.
What this article adds: A special issue of The Journal of Development Studies, featuring eight studies from Africa and South Asia, supports the hypothesis that household agricultural production has direct and important linkages with dietary patterns and nutrition. The analysis reflects challenges in establishing a link, e.g. which variables, data and methods to use. The main pathways of influence include income from agriculture; consumption of own production (or some combination of these); and factors linked to gender (women’s social status and empowerment in agriculture). Commercialisation of agriculture may not impact on or may negatively affect child nutrition. Livestock production emerged as particularly linked to nutrition. Effects will be determined by local conditions.
Global, national and local policies and programmes for agricultural development are recurrently justified based on their alleged role in improving food and nutrition security. However, strikingly little evidence is available to prove that a direct, household-level link between agricultural production and improved nutrition exists. A recent special issue of The Journal of Development Studies systematically and empirically tests whether a relationship between household agricultural production and nutrition can be found. Eight featured studies examine the relationship between agricultural production (crops or livestock), household dietary diversity, and children’s (and in some cases maternal) diet and anthropometric outcomes across countries in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia (Nigeria, Uganda. Ethiopia, Zambia, Mozambique, Tanzania and Nepal). The introductory article, featuring highlights of each study and overall conclusions, is summarised here.
The main pathways through which expanded agricultural production can influence nutrition at farm-level include income from agriculture; consumption of own production (or some combination of these); and factors linked to gender. Increased household income from any activity, including agriculture, can alter the amount, composition and quality of food consumed and facilitate the purchase of health and nutrition-related goods and services. However, on the basis of previous evidence, the authors assert that the commercialisation of agriculture and the resulting shift away from staples to cash crops have not necessarily resulted in improvements in children’s nutritional status and can have negative nutritional consequences. Recent research, looking specifically at child nutrition outcomes, mirrors this view and shows that, while income is important, the Millennium Development Goal of halving the prevalence of underweight children is unlikely to be met through income growth alone. Where there are market imperfections, agricultural production by a household can influence household consumption, depending on what is produced and seasonal factors. The authors suggest that the mechanisms by which these effects occur are mediated by gender relations within the household, including women’s social status and empowerment in agriculture. Policies and programmes that seek to use agriculture as a direct means to improve food security and nutrition of agricultural households implicitly assume that these household-level effects exist and that their magnitude is economically meaningful.
The authors of this article summarise challenges in establishing a link between agriculture and nutrition at farm level. Firstly, there are challenges in identifying the right set of variables to analyse. Studies may focus on production diversity or types of agricultural products, and on nutrition inputs (e.g. dietary diversity or dietary intake) and/or nutrition outcomes (e.g. anthropometric measures). The selection of variables may be limited if using data not collected specifically to analyse the agriculture-nutrition link. There are also challenges associated with the use of appropriate data and methods to establish an agriculture-nutrition link. For example, national data sets provide broader validity, but tend to allow less detailed examination of local issues compared to case studies. The benefit of experimental data is that it is easier to establish a causal relationship between agriculture and nutrition; however experiments have well-known limitations. Observational data play an important role in trying to understand the farm-nutrition relationship, but identifying a causal impact between agriculture and nutrition outcomes can be difficult. Notwithstanding the substantial variation in measures, methods and approaches, eight papers in this special issue all trace some associations between agricultural production and diets or nutrition outcomes. The authors synthesise the results of each study in turn (see Table 1 for summary findings).
One study looks at the impact and intensity of participation in a biofortification (B-carotene-rich orange sweet potato) programme on vitamin A density, micronutrient adequacy and diversity of children’s diet in Mozambique (De Brauw, Fozenou & Moursi, 2015). In this study, the authors are able to trace positive impacts of programme participation on all outcomes, particularly on vitamin A density; there is increased impact with greater intensity of participation in the programme.
Two papers study the impact of engagement in agriculture and crop production diversity on dietary diversity, anthropometry outcomes and consumption of specific food groups in Nigeria (Dillon, McGee & Oseni, 2015) and Zambia (Kumar, Harris & Rawat, 2015). Both studies find positive associations between crop and dietary diversity; the Zambia study also shows a positive association between crop diversity and height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) in children aged 24 months and older.
Three papers look at the role of livestock ownership in improving diets by increasing consumption of animal-source foods. One study from Ethiopia shows a strong effect of household cow ownership on increased frequency of milk and dairy consumption among young children (Hoddinott, Headey & Dereje, 2015). Data from Uganda show a positive association between livestock ownership and the consumption of a range of animal source foods (Azzarri, Zezza, Haile et al, 2015). Data from Tanzania show that ownership of large livestock holdings is associated with lower odds of stunting among pre-schoolers and that children aged five to nine from pastoralist households are better nourished (Slavchevska, 2015).
Two papers that use data from Nepal, one from a nationally-representative survey (Shively & Sununtnasuk, 2015) and one from the baseline survey for an impact evaluation of a multi-sectoral nutrition programme (Malapit, Kadiyala, Ouisumbina et al, 2015), find associations between production diversity and dietary diversity, and between production diversity and nutrition outcomes (HAZ in the Shively study and weight-for-height Z-score in the Malapit study). While identification issues prevent these two studies from making casual claims, these studies go beyond a general link between agriculture and nutrition to look more specifically into agricultural commercialisation (Shively et al, 2015) and the mediating role of women’s empowerment (Malapit et al, 2015). Shively et al use data from Nepalese agricultural households to detect a positive, if small, association between market orientation and HAZ for children under two. In this case, increased income generated by agricultural sales more than offsets possible adverse impacts associated with less food being available for own consumption. Authors of the second Nepal study find that women’s engagement in the community, control over income, reduced workload and the overall empowerment score are positively associated with better maternal nutrition. Control over income is also associated with better child HAZ and a lower gender parity gap improves children’s diets and HAZ.
Taken together, the authors of the introduction to this special issue support the hypothesis that household agricultural production has direct and important linkages with household dietary patterns and the nutrition of individual members. The magnitude of the impacts varies, probably as a result of differences between the studies with regard to several key factors, such as commodities, contexts and location and the intensity of programme participation. While links to crop production and diversity of production are found to matter in certain contexts, livestock production seems also to emerge as particularly important and positively linked to nutrition. The results suggest that support to agriculture can play a direct role in promoting nutrition, but that the effects might not be as dramatic as anticipated and depend on local conditions. The papers also highlight the limits of available data in precisely measuring farm-level causal relationships between agricultural production and nutrition. The authors conclude that there is a need to devote more efforts to filling the data gaps that make such analyses so difficult in the developing world.
1 Carletto, G., Ruel, M., Winters, P. & Zezza, A. (2015).Farm-level Pathways to Improved Nutritional Status: Introduction to the Special Issue, The Journal of Development Studies, 51:8, 945-957 www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220388.2015.1018908
Azzarri, C., Zezza, A., Haile, B. and Cross, E. (2015). Does livestock ownership affect animal source foods consumption and child nutritional status? Evidence from rural Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 8, 2015.
De Brauw, A., Fozenou, P. and Moursi, M. (2015). Programme participation intensity and children’s nutritional status: Evidence from a randomised control trial in Mozambique.
The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 8, 2015.
Dillon, A., McGee, K. and Oseni, G. (2015). Agricultural production, dietary diversity and climate variability. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 8, 2015.
Hoddinott, J., Headey, D. and Dereje, M. (2015). Cows, missing milk markets, and nutrition in rural Ethiopia. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 8, 2015.
Kumar, N., Harris, J. and Rawat, R (2015). If they grow it, will they eat and grow? Evidence from Zambia on agricultural diversity and child undernutrition. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 8, 2015.
Malapit, H. J. L., Kadiyala, S., Ouisumbina, A. R., Cunningham, K. and Tyagi, P. (2015). Women’s empowerment mitigates the negative effects of low production diversity on maternal and child nutrition in Nepal. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 8, 2015.
Shively, G. and Sununtnasuk, C. (2015). Agricultural diversity and child stunting in Nepal. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 8, 2015.
Slavchevska, V. (2015). Agricultural production and the nutritional status of family members in Tanzania. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Iss. 8, 2015.
More like this
FEX: The potential of nutrition-sensitive Conservation Agriculture: lessons from Zambia
By Anne Marie Mayer, Marjolein-Mwanamwenge and Carl Whal Anne Marie Mayer works as a freelance nutritionist specialising in the links between agriculture and nutrition. She...
FEX: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned and where do we go from here?
Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Agriculture has strong potential to improve nutrition outcomes through improving food availability and access and through...
FEX: Is reliable water access the solution to undernutrition?
Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Irrigation interventions have the potential to reduce undernutrition by impacting food security, nutrition and...
FEX: Livestock and nutrition: Summary of a discussion paper for the Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards
View this article as a pdf By Kate Sadler Dr Kate Sadler is a public nutritionist with over 20 years of experience in the design, management, evaluation and research of...
NEX: Singing the same song: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture messages in Zambia
Bertha Munthali has worked for ten years on nutrition in agriculture in Africa, and is currently advisor for the Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Analysis...
FEX: Introduction to the special issue
The most recent Lancet series on maternal and child undernutrition (Bhutta et al, 2013) calculated that even with 90% coverage of specific nutrition interventions (addressing...
FEX: Linking agriculture with nutrition within SDG2: making a case for a dietary diversity indicator
By Anna Lartey Anna Lartey is Director of FAO's Nutrition Division within the Economic and Social Development Department at FAO in Rome. She was a Professor of Nutrition at...
The role of nutrition-sensitive agriculture in improving diets of young children: Homestead food production in Nepal
View this article as a pdf Rojee Suwal is the Senior Manager of Agriculture and Food Security in the Suaahara II programme, Helen Keller International, Nepal. Basu Dev Kafle...
FEX: Impact of agronomy and livestock interventions on women’s and children’s dietary diversity in Mali
By Damouko Bonde Lisez cet article en français ici Damouko Bonde is a specialist in project monitoring and evaluation with AVSF Mali. This project was implemented and...
FEX: Improving food security and addressing nutrition of vulnerable farming communities affected by conflict and natural disaster in mid-western Nepal
By Guido Agostinucci Guido Agostinucci is an agronomist who collaborated with the Faculty of Agriculture of the University of Viterbo and worked as consultant with FAO since...
FEX: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Zambia: work in progress
By Abigail Moyo, Eunice Bwalya Chishimba and Mary Corbett Abigail Moyo is the Nutrition Facilitator with Self Help Africa (SHA), working in Luwingu District since May 2014....
FEX: Nutrition-sensitive research in Ghana
By Dr Richmond Aryeetey Dr Richmond Aryeetey is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Public Health, where he teaches public health nutrition. He is engaged...
FEX: Impact of an integrated agriculture and nutrition and health behaviour change communication programme for women in Burkina Faso
Summary of research1 Location: Burkina Faso What we know: The agricultural sector has great potential to contribute to improving nutrition.; However, current evidence of...
FEX: Improving child nutrition and development through community-based child care centres (CBCCs) in Malawi
Summary of presentation1 View this article as a pdf By Aisha Twalibu, Natalie Roschnik, Aulo Gelli, Mangani Katundu, George Chidalengwa, Peter Phiri and Helen Moestue Aisha...
FEX: Impact of a homestead food production programme on household and child nutrition in Cambodi
Summary of research1 Location: Cambodia What we know: Food-based strategies such as homestead food production have the potential to increase micronutrient intake and improve...
FEX: Beyond the drinking glass: expanding our understanding of water-nutrition linkages
By Dawit Mekonnen, International Food Policy Research Institute View this article as a pdf Dawit Mekonnen is a Research Fellow at the International Food Policy Research...
FEX: Mainstreaming human nutrition in livestock interventions: lessons learnt from a capacity-building workshop for the Sahel region
By Paula Dominguez-Salas, Domitille Kauffman, Christophe Breyne and Pablo Alarcon Paula Dominguez-Salas is a research fellow in human nutrition working in nutrition-sensitive...
FEX: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Zambia: A continued work in progress
Nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Zambia: A continued work in progress1 View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici By Mary Corbett Mary Corbett is...
NEX: Unlocking Zambia’s Agricultural Potential for Nutrition Development
William Chilufya William Chilufya is a civil society advocate with 9 years of experience in championing pro poor development in Zambia. He is leading the Zambia Civil Society...
FEX: A multi-sector approach for nutrition in school-age children and adolescents in Malawi
This is a summary of a Field Exchange field article that was included in issue 66. The original article was authored by Doreen Matonga, Keisha Nyirenda, Jason Chigamba and...
Reference this page
Editors (). Links between household agricultural production and nutrition. Field Exchange 51, January 2016. p48. www.ennonline.net/fex/51/hhagriculturalproduction