Menu ENN Search

The missing ingredients: Are policy-makers doing enough on water, sanitation and hygiene to end malnutrition?


Summary of report*

Location: Global

What we know: There are many pathways linking poor WASH with undernutrition; how ‘integration’ of WASH and nutrition interventions is defined varies considerably.

What this article adds: An analysis of nutrition and WASH plans and policies in 13 countries found that embedding WASH in nutrition plans and policies varied widely and was largely limited; very few WASH plans referenced nutrition. Lack of budget information prevented cost analysis. Working together should be considered along a continuum, ranging from simple information-sharing and shared targeting through to a more closely integrated and jointly delivered programme. Nutrition and WASH policy-makers share a common vision and goal of improving health that can help bridge inherent differences.

Comprehensive national nutrition plans are critical to detail the mechanisms and systems required to allow more cohesive operations.


Evidence shows that scaling up interventions that tackle the immediate causes of malnutrition is insufficient to overcome the challenge. A more comprehensive ‘recipe’ requiring a mix of ‘ingredients’ from multiple sectors is critical to address both the immediate and underlying causes of malnutrition. 

A report from SHARE (Sanitation and Hygiene Applied Research for Equity) and WaterAid highlights why water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) are essential for nutrition. An estimated 50% of undernutrition is associated with infections caused by poor WASH, contributing to 860,000 preventable annual deaths in children under five years of age. Evidence from a number of trials and observational studies has identified three biological mechanisms linking WASH to undernutrition, including repeated bouts of diarrhea, intestinal parasitic infections and environmental enteric dysfunction (EED). There may be other important WASH-related social and economic pathways.

Growing evidence of the links between nutrition and WASH has contributed to building momentum for better coordination, collaboration and integration. However, the definitions that different sectors, individuals and organisations use for ‘integration’ vary considerably along a continuum. This ranges from very minimal coordination and collaboration on one side through to a more closely integrated and jointly delivered programme on the other.

Through an analysis of both nutrition and WASH plans and policies in 13 Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) countries (Bangladesh, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Nepal, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Timor-Leste, Uganda and Zambia), the report evaluates the degree to which national strategies in both ‘sectors’ are integrated. It identifies gaps in coordination and ways of working, and where and how improvements must be made.


Countries selected for analysis were based on SHARE’s focus countries and WaterAid’s country programmes, for which national, multi-sector nutrition action plans or strategies were freely available online. National, multi-sector nutrition action plans were the primary focus of analysis, although national nutrition policies were also reviewed for a comprehensive picture. Pre-defined criteria used for reviewing action plans included:

In addition, a keyword search of nutrition terms1 in the national WASH plans and policies of the 13 countries was conducted to allow for a basic assessment of whether the plans include nutrition considerations.

Key findings

WASH into nutrition varies widely. All the nutrition plans and policies that were analysed recognise the importance of WASH; however, the degree to which WASH is embedded within plans varies significantly across countries in terms of objectives, targets, interventions and indicators (Nepal and Timor-Leste have the strongest plans in terms of embedding WASH components). 

Nutrition into WASH is limited. Very few WASH plans reference nutrition or identify opportunities to integrate with nutrition and health programmes and campaigns (with the exception of Liberia). 

Limited budget information

Of the plans analysed, a detailed budget for activities was not generally included in the same document, limiting the ability to capture the budget for WASH activities. Where budget was available, this was provided at the level of the objectives or priority areas and not by activity; thus a detailed costing analysis was not possible within the scope of this research.

One size does not fit all. There is no single blueprint for how WASH should be embedded in nutrition plans, nor for how WASH programmes can be made more nutrition-sensitive. However, consideration of some key principles and approaches could help drive progress. For example, designing WASH programmes to target populations most vulnerable to nutrition and/or identifying opportunities to integrate activities such as those related to behaviours (e.g. personal and food hygiene and breastfeeding) could result in more joined-up approaches. 

Continuum approach. Working together should be considered along a continuum, with different degrees or approaches to collaboration. This may range from simply sharing information and targeting different programmes to the same populations to a more integrated programme, involving the same staff and a single budget. 

Challenges in working together. Inherent differences in the objectives, outcomes of interest and people involved in delivering nutrition and WASH programmes present a number of challenges to working together. Unlike those responsible for nutrition, the WASH sector is not dependent on nutrition action for achieving its primary objectives. However, both nutrition and WASH policy-makers share a common vision and goal of improving health, and evidence shows that public health aims have been a key driver of investments in WASH, particularly sanitation. Working together can also leverage investments across the two sectors to maximise health impact and improve cost-effectiveness. Plans and policies are a core part of the process of outlining the mechanisms and systems required to allow more cohesive working to advance nutrition and WASH goals.

The report uses findings from the analysis, along with existing evidence and lessons learned to date, to provide insights into the different ways of working to enhance nutrition and WASH coordination and collaboration across different stages of the policy cycle.


According to the report, comprehensive national nutrition plans are a critical first step toward ending malnutrition by 2030, but they must include all three WASH ‘ingredients’. Moreover, these plans should be underpinned by sufficient financing, effective coordination, timely tracking of results and stronger institutions. The report makes specific recommendations on how partners – governments, UN agencies, donors, technical agencies and international NGOs and academics – can play their part to ensure an integrated approach to ending malnutrition.

An infographic on how well water, sanitation and hygiene are integrated into national programmes is available at:



1Agriculture, anaemia, (breast)feeding, food, micro(nutrient) deficiency, nutrition (which also captures ‘malnutrition’ and ‘undernutrition’), stunting, under(weight), wasting.

*The missing ingredients: are policy-makers doing enough on water, sanitation and hygiene to end malnutrition? WaterAid. SHARE, Health Start. August 2016.

More like this

FEX: WaterAid

Agency profile Name: WaterAid Address: WaterAid, 47-49 Durham Street, London, SE11 5JD, UK Email: Website: Year founded:...

The Missing Ingredients

WaterAid and SHARE have launched the report The missing ingredients to highlight the degree to which national nutrition and water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) plans and...

FEX: Advocating for nutrition in West Africa: The role of SUN Civil Society Alliances

By Judith Kabore and Laure Serra Judith Kabore is an advocacy officer at the regional office of Action Against Hunger. A journalist by training, Judith worked in the Ministry...

FEX: BabyWASH coalition planned to overcome development silos

By Peter Hynes, World Vision Actors from non-governmental organisations (NGOs), donors, academia, United Nations (UN) agencies and others met recently to consider forming a...

NEX: The growing interest in Nutrition and WASH: Some new initiatives and developments

Interest and commitment to nutrition-sensitive interventions and multi-sector coordination has led to an increased number of initiatives and publications on nutrition and...

FEX: Role of communication and advocacy in scaling up nutrition: lessons and plans from the Zambian experience

By Eneya Phiri Eneya Phiri is a seasoned advocate with four-and-a-half years' experience in nutrition advocacy and communications. He is a keen believer in communications for...

NEX: Editorial

We are delighted to share with you Issue 5 of Nutrition Exchange. In keeping with our aim to have the majority of NEX content written by national actors engaged in nutrition...

FEX: A journey to multi-sector nutrition programming in Nepal: evolution, processes and way forward

By Pradiumna Dahal, Anirudra Sharma and Stanley Chitekwe Pradiumna Dahal is a nutrition specialist with UNICEF Nepal and has more than 15 years' experience in public health,...

NEX: Advocating for nutrition in West Africa: The role of SUN civil society alliances

Judith Kabore is an advocacy officer at the regional office of Action Against Hunger (ACF). Before this, she worked for nine years in the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso and...

FEX: Complementary food hygiene: An overlooked opportunity in the WASH, nutrition and health sectors

Summary of research1 Location: Global What we know: Poor food hygiene may account for a substantial proportion of diarrhoeal diseases and contribute to malnutrition among...

FEX: Promoting an integrated famine prevention package: Breaking bottlenecks

Summary of the report of the global Food Security and Nutrition Cluster meeting, 26 April 2017 at World Food Programme HQ, Rome The global Food Security Cluster (FSC) and...

NEX: Drilling down to sub-national level: Multi-sector implementation in Kenya, Nepal and Senegal

Drilling down to sub-national level: Multi-sector implementation in Kenya, Nepal and Senegal ENN's SUN Knowledge Management team There has been substantial...

FEX: WASHplus in Mali: integrating WASH and nutrition for healthy communities

By Renuka Bery, Sahada Traore and Lonna Shafritz Renuka Bery is the Integration Manager of the WASHplus project managed by FHI 360. She currently oversees the WASHplus...

en-net: Nutrition Consultant need-Very urgent

TERMS OF REFERENCE Turkana Health and Nutrition Project Evaluation and Impact analysis 1. Context The greater Turkana district composed of 6 districts has a total of 17...

en-net: GOAL seeks Nutrition Coordinator in Niger

Since the food crises of 2005, GOAL has continuously supported the population of Mirriah district in Zinder Region through the implementation of community-based programmes...

en-net: Humanitarian Nutrition Advisor wanted by Save the Children

Humanitarian Nutrition in Save the Children UK is growing and there is a great opportunity to be part of it! We are recruiting a Humanitarian Nutrition Advisor to be part of...

FEX: SUN Movement experiences in Indonesia

By Nina Sardjunani and Endang L. Achadi Nina Sardjunani is the SUN Lead Group member and was previously Deputy Minister of Ministry of National Development/National...

NEX: Editorial

Listen to an interview with the editors (podcast) on ENN's MediaHub Welcome to this eighth issue of Nutrition Exchange (NEX), in which we have widened our geographical...

FEX: En-net update

By Tamsin Walters, en-net moderator Over the past four months (1st October 2015 to 17th January 2016), 56 questions have been posted on en-net generating 206 responses....

FEX: Beyond the drinking glass: expanding our understanding of water-nutrition linkages

By Dawit Mekonnen, International Food Policy Research Institute Dawit Mekonnen is a Research Fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in the...


Reference this page

Water Aid (2016). The missing ingredients: Are policy-makers doing enough on water, sanitation and hygiene to end malnutrition?. Field Exchange 53, November 2016. p56.