Menu ENN Search

Methods to detect cases of severely malnourished infants under six months

Summary of research1

Location: Global

What we know: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends weight-for-length z score (WLZ) as an anthropometric indicator to identify severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in infants <6m.

What this article adds: A review was undertaken of recent evidence of methods for detecting acute malnutrition in infants <6m to assess their ability to reflect both mortality risk and nutritional status in this age group. Clinical and anthropometric methods were assessed against 11 criteria (simplicity; acceptability; cost; precision; accuracy; sensitivity; specificity; predictive value; objectivity; quantitativeness; and independence of age). Weight-for-age (WFA), mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) and MUAC-for-age (MUAC/A) were rated the best indicators of acute malnutrition and associated mortality in this age group, based on current evidence. MUAC/A compared to MUAC with a single cut-off  (<11cm) does not add to sensitivity, specificity or predictive value. WFA may be useful in certain community settings where weight measurements are taken routinely. WFL scored poorly in terms of simplicity, acceptability, cost, accuracy and poorer predictive value for mortality; difficulties in accurately measuring length in the age group are also an important constraint. The review proposes MUAC and WFA alongside simple clinical indicators should be used to identify acute malnutrition in infants <6m, including infants born small or pre-term. Priorities for future research include a formal evaluation of the community management of uncomplicated acute malnutrition in infants < 6 months of age (C-MAMI) tool and assessment of MUAC and WFA at scale in the community in this age group.

Measuring MUAC of an infant, Kilifi County Hospital, KenyaWorld Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines currently recommend using weight-for-length z-scores (WLZ) to diagnose severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in infants less than six months old (infants <6m). However, this recommendation is based largely on convention of diagnosis in older children rather than scientific evidence. Guided by an existing review of children aged 6-59 months (Myatt et al, 2006), this paper examines recent evidence to evaluate possible methods for detecting acute malnutrition in infants <6m in community and healthcare settings. The review assessed clinical and anthropometric ability to reflect both mortality risk and nutritional status in this age group. Methods were scored against 11 criteria: simplicity; acceptability; cost; precision; accuracy; sensitivity; specificity; predictive value; objectivity; quantitativeness; and independence of age. Indicators were identified from a 2012 systematic literature review for admission and discharge criteria for this age group (Kerac et al, 2012) and papers published since 2012 or in press, found in a search of PUBMED and through personal communications with authors.

Results

The literature highlighted the following indicators for infants <6m: weight-for-length (WFL); weight-for-age (WFA); length-for-age (LFA), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), MUAC-for-age (MUAC/A) and clinical indicators, such as the infant being too weak to suckle effectively and breastfeeding issues (or ‘maternal milk insufficiency’ (MMI)). Findings against each of the 11 criteria were as follows:

Simplicity

Clinical assessment methods vary in their simplicity; assessment of infant suckling takes patience and training, whereas MMI relies on mother’s reporting. A new tool, community management of uncomplicated acute malnutrition in infants < 6 months of age (C-MAMI), provides a simple form of clinical assessment, preferred by basic health staff. Assessment of age in infants <6m appears to be more reliable than that for older children; however formal evaluation of this is needed. Pre-term or low birth weight infants are more likely to be identified as malnourished, which may lead to unnecessary intervention; however elevated risk of mortality in this age group means they should be equally included in nutrition interventions (Mwangome et al, 2017).

Mothers and health workers can find the process of measuring length in the <6m age group difficult, whereas weight measurements are routine, more acceptable and scales are more likely to be available. Calculating z-scores or using look-up tables is complex for healthcare staff, particularly for WFL, which requires use of different length and height tables. MUAC may be a simpler indicator as no z-scores are required and minimal equipment and training are needed.

Acceptability

Weighing an infant at a UNICEF-supported outpatient therapeutic centre in Kabasa IDP camp, Dolow, SomaliaThe presence of a male health worker and/or insufficient privacy reduce the acceptability of breastfeeding assessment tools to carers; assessments that rely on questions alone rather than observations may be more acceptable. Carers and infants can become distressed during both length and weight measurements and the handling of heavy, bulky length boards reduces the acceptability of length assessments for health workers. MUAC for infants <6m may be more acceptable to carers and operators as the infant can remain dressed, stay in their carer’s arms, the mother can take the measurement and MUAC tapes are highly portable.

Cost

Some breastfeeding assessment tools are costly in terms of personnel, equipment and time, although other, simpler tools require less training, including the clinical assessment section of the C-MAMI tool. Hanging spring scales cost less than other scales and are routinely used in community programmes; length boards may prove too costly for some programmes. MUAC is likely to be the least costly assessment method as the equipment required is cheap (£0.30) and minimum training is required.

Objectivity and quantitativeness

Clinical assessment is generally considered to be subjective and difficult to standardise and express quantitatively, whereas anthropometric indicators are generally regarded as objective and quantitative. Simple, low-cost and objective methods may be most useful for community frontline screening.

Independence of age

Earlier studies found MUAC to be relatively independent of age in older children but less so in infants under one year old. However, a recent study in Kenya found that a single MUAC threshold of <11cm performed similarly to MUAC/A in predicting mortality in infants <6m (Mwangome et al, 2017). The same study also found that WFL, WFA and LFA were associated with age in infants <6m.

Precision and accuracy

Both accuracy and precision of age have been highlighted as questionable among older children but have not been assessed in infants <6m. Weight using hanging scales with 100g graduation units may not be accurate enough for this age group, although this needs formal assessment. Studies show that accuracy of weight can be greatly influenced by clothing. Health workers appear to make fewer mistakes using MUAC compared to WFA and WFH for older children and may under-diagnose infant malnutrition when using WFL. Reliability of z-score calculations and infant anthropometry data can be low, with more missing data values and errors compared to older children.

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value

Evidence suggests that existing breastfeeding assessment tools would be neither sensitive enough for outpatient care nor specific enough for inpatient care. Further studies are needed to identify standardised breastfeeding indicators which correctly capture mother’s concerns, as these are likely to be sensitive and predictive. One study in Kenya found that a MUAC cut-off of <11cm identified 24% of hospitalised infants at risk of inpatient mortality with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 68%, compared to WFA <-3 z-score, which was less sensitive (55%) but more specific (80%). In terms of predictive value, MUAC and WFA were found to be better at  predicting mortality compared to WFL and LFA in an inpatient setting (Mwangome et al, 2017). Other studies support the greater predictive value of WFA compared to WFL and LFA. Another study in Kenya showed no significant difference in predictive value when using a combination of MUAC and/or WFA compared to MUAC alone, although WFA identified additional infants with high case fatality (Mwangome et al, 2017a).

Despite relatively low prevalence, checking for kwashiorkor should be included as an additional indicator of SAM in infants <6m as checking is simple, acceptable, low cost, largely objective and independent of age.   

Conclusions

Based on current evidence, the best indicators of acute malnutrition and associated mortality in infants <6m appear to be WFA, MUAC and MUAC/A. A fixed MUAC cut-off rate has the additional benefit of not depending on age, which can add inaccuracy. WFA suffers from the potential imprecision of cost-effective scales; however overlap of weight measurements with other routine health checks makes WFA feasible in many settings. WFL, although the current recommended indicator, scored poorly in this review, largely due to inaccuracy, difficulties associated with measuring length and poorer predictive value for mortality. The authors recommend MUAC and WFA, alongside simple clinical indicators and identification of kwashiorkor, as standard indicators for acute malnutrition in infants <6m, including infants born small or pre-term.

Priorities for future research include a formal evaluation of the C-MAMI tool and an assessment of the use of WFA and MUAC at scale in the community for infants <6m, taking into account use of different weighing scales and accuracy of age calculations.


Footnotes

1Lelijveld N, Kerac M, McGrath M, Mwangome M, Berkley J. (2017) A review of methods to detect cases of severely malnourished infants less than 6 months for their admission into therapeutic care.

2http://www.ennonline.net/c-mami


References

Kerac M, Trehan I, Weisz A, Agapova S, Manary M. Admission and discharge criteria for the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants aged under 6 months. Geneva: World Health Organization 2012.

Mwangome MK, Ngari M, Fegan G, et al. (2017) Diagnosis Criteria For Severe Acute Malnutrition Amongst Infants Aged Under 6 Months. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2017.

Mwangome MK, Ngari M, Fegan G, et al. (2017a) Diagnosis Criteria For Severe Acute Malnutrition Amongst Infants Aged Under 6 Months. Personal communication with authors 2017.

Myatt M, Khara T, Collins S. A review of methods to detect cases of severely malnourished children in the community for their admission into community-based therapeutic care programs. Food and nutrition bulletin 2006;27:S7-S23.

More like this

FEX: Anthropometry in infants under 6 months in rural Kenya

Summary of research1 Reliability study participants It is currently estimated that worldwide 8.5 million infants under 6 months are wasted. In poor communities, low rates of...

FEX: Improving community management of uncomplicated acute malnutrition in infants under six months (C-MAMI): Developing a checklist version of the C-MAMI tool

Summary of MSc project report1 By Sonja Read Sonja Read is a public health nutritionist from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. She has previously worked in...

en-net: Request advice: equipment to assess nutritional status 0-5 yrs in field study PNG

Early 2015 I will be going as a volunteer to a very remote area in Papua New Guinea (PNG), a relatively remote outpost Kanabea in the Kaintiba District, in the highland fringe...

en-net: Management of ‘at risk’ mothers and infants under 6 months in the context of COVID 19 (escalated question to the Wasting TWG)

Given the programme adaptation recommendations for management of wasting in the context of COVID 19, can we also consider expanding the use of MUAC and community-based care...

en-net: Precision of equipment to assess infants in surveys

I have a question from an NGO regarding including infants in an anthropometric survey. What precision is needed for anthropometirc assessment of infants, including those less...

FEX: MUAC vs WHZ in predicting mortality in hospitalised children under five years of age

Summary of research1 This research contributes to the evidence base regarding which anthropometric indicators identify malnourished sick children most at risk of death. Low...

en-net: Community-based management and use of MUAC for infants <6months

Hello Colleagues, Given the following programme adaptation recommendations for managment of wasting in the recent technical brief issued, are we considering to expand use of...

FEX: MAMI Interest Group meeting

On 27th January 2016, ENN, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Save the Children co-hosted a one day meeting of a Management of Acute Malnutrition in...

FEX: Piloting the C-MAMI approach in the Rohingya response in Bangladesh

By Anne Marie Kueter, Alice Burrell, Sarah Butler, Mostofa Sarwar and Habibur Rahaman View this article as a pdf Anne Marie is a nutritionist with over five years'...

FEX: Management of At risk Mothers and Infants (MAMI) meeting

A one-day meeting of the Management of At risk Mothers and Infants (MAMI)1 Special Interest Group (SIG) took place in London on 17 January 2018. The meeting was hosted by ENN...

FEX: Risk factors for severe acute malnutrition in infants <6 months old in semi-urban Bangladesh: A prospective cohort study to inform future assessment/treatment tools

Summary of conference abstract1 Presented at the ACF research conference, November 9th, 2016. By M Munirul Islam, Yasir Arafat, Nicki Connell, Golam Mothabbir, Marie...

FEX: Implementing the family-MUAC approach for infants under 6 months in the context of COVID-19 in Ethiopia

View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici By Ritu Rana, Hatty Barthorp, Mary T Murphy and Alemayhu Beri Ritu Rana is a GOAL Nutrition Research...

FEX: Management of acute malnutrition in infants less than six months in a South Sudanese refugee population in Ethiopia

By Mary T Murphy, Kassahun Abebe, Sinead O'Mahony, Hatty Barthorp & Chris Andert View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Sinead O'Mahony is a...

FEX: MUAC Versus Weight-for-Height in Assessing Severe Malnutrition

Summary of published paper1 An infant having MUAC measured during the study in Kenya Current WHO guidelines for the management of severe malnutrition in children recommend...

FEX: Diluted F100 v infant formula in treatment of severely malnourished infants < 6 months

By Caroline Wilkinson and Sheila Isanaka Caroline Wilkinson was Nutrition Advisor with Action Contre la Faim - France (ACF-F), until November 2008. She spent most of 2007 in...

FEX: Severe malnutrition in infants under six months old: outcomes and risk factors in Bangladesh

Summary of research1 Location: Bangladesh What we know: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants under six months with uncomplicated severe acute...

en-net: Key questions regarding MUAC only programming - towards a research agenda

I have started this thread in the hope that we can come together there to work out what we need to do to move forward with an informed debate on issues around MUAC-only...

en-net: New version of R package 'zscorer' available

Ernest and I have been working on the zscorer package for the R Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. v0.3.1 of the zscorer package calculates and adds nutritional...

Resource: Anthropometry at birth and at age of routine vaccination to predict mortality in the first year of life: A birth cohort study in Burkina Faso

Abstract Background The World Health Organization currently defines severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in infants aged under 6 months of age using weight-for-length Z score...

FEX: Finding the right MUAC cut-off to improve screening efficiency

Author Koert Ritmeijer, MSF Holland In Hlaing Thayer township, Yangon, Burma, ORWs were spending a considerable amount of time doing weight and height measurements on all...

Close

Reference this page

Methods to detect cases of severely malnourished infants under six months. Field Exchange 55, July 2017. p41. www.ennonline.net/fex/55/methodstodetectcases

(ENN_5723)

Close

Download to a citation manager

The below files can be imported into your preferred reference management tool, most tools will allow you to manually import the RIS file. Endnote may required a specific filter file to be used.