Making connections: Joint meeting of WaSt Technical Interest Group and MAMI Special Interest Group
ENN coordinates two international technical groups, the Management of at-risk Mothers and Infants under six months Special Interest Group (MAMI SIG) and the Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG), to help identify and address critical questions for nutrition policy, guidance, research and related programming. Member expertise includes nutrition, child growth, medicine, epidemiology, nutrition policy and programming. Each group has conducted several research and programme-oriented activities and periodically meets to discuss new findings and set priorities.
The MAMI SIG was set up to help address critical gaps in policy, research and programming in managing malnourished infants under six months of age; the scope has broadened to at-risk mothers and infants under six months of age. Members are programmers, researchers and policy-makers directly engaged in this area. The group supports evidence development (through informed research agendas, research and reviews), helps fill gaps in policy and guidance, and provides a forum for peer support to support programming.
The WaSt TIG was set up to explore the disconnect between wasting and stunting. Members are experienced researchers and experts in relevant fields. The group aims to bring together existing knowledge and support evidence development (identifying and prioritising gaps and conducting research) to better understand the linkages between wasting and stunting and to consider these in relation to nutrition policies, programmes and future research.
On 16 January 2018, ENN opportunistically convened a shared MAMI SIG/WAST TIG meeting in Oxford (UK), funded by Irish Aid. Group members were joined by representatives from funders, agencies and researchers working in international nutrition. Sixty-six individuals participated. The aims of the meeting were to share headlines from the work undertaken by both groups; collectively examine programmes, policy and research implications; and nurture synergies.
The meeting began with a history of both groups and a brief overview of key work and latest research findings by group members (Box 1 and 2). An important common finding from several analyses/reviews by both groups was the value of both weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurement in identifying high-risk infants < 6 months and children. Afternoon plenary discussion and working groups identified the need for a new policy narrative that reframes nutritional vulnerability, spanning types of malnutrition and age groups and encompassing both treatment and prevention.
Box 1: The WaSt story so far
Tanya Khara (ENN) shared the evolution of the WaST Group, which stemmed from a review of financing arrangements around Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) by ENN and has since developed through several phases of work. Phase 1 (2014 to 2016) centred on a review of the evidence of the links between wasting and stunting and a WaSt research prioritisation that subsequently informed phase 2 (2016 to 2017). Phase 2 included Global Nutrition Report panel analysis (2016), several published papers, and a briefing note. An 84-country meta-analysis of prevalence and burden of children aged 6 to 59 months concurrently wasted and stunted found concurrence is prevalent, especially in boys, and concluded that these children are at particularly high risk of death; concurrence should be reported routinely and there is a need to investigate whether these children are being reached. Influence of this work was reflected in the WHO/UNICEF 2016 Joint Estimates report recognising the issue for the first time and noting that a global estimate for the level of concurrence is not known.
A working group of the WaSt TIG was subsequently formed to examine two core questions: what is the risk associated with being concurrently wasted and stunted and how best to detect these children. Two datasets were examined, one consisting of 2,426 (SMART) surveys of almost 1.8 million children from 51 countries and a second from Niakhar, Senegal (McDonald et al). André Briend (University of Tampere) shared key findings from these analyses. This showed that all children who are wasted and stunted are also underweight; ‘multiple anthropometric deficit’ (wasting+stunting+underweight) is not an independent category and this term should be abandoned; when a child experiences both wasting and stunting concurrently there is a strong multiplicative effect on mortality risk; both weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) detect WaSt; MUAC and WAZ are both independently associated with risk of death (but not WHZ, HAZ or WaSt); and WAZ <-2.8 detects a group of high-risk children not detected by MUAC. These results suggest that WAZ could be considered as an additional criterion for identifying high-risk children not identified by MUAC for admission into CMAM programmes. Most immediately, testing of these findings on other datasets and further modelling of caseload and programmatic implications are needed.
Pending research questions include: what is the optimal WAZ cut-off avoiding overloading programmes but detecting high-risk children missed by MUAC<115 mm; how to adjust WAZ in programmes using a higher MUAC cut-off; and whether the same findings are repeated when other mortality cohorts are analysed.
Also under the auspices of the WaSt TIG, Sophie Moore (Kings College, London) shared the results of a retrospective cohort analysis of longitudinal data in Gambian children from 1976-2016. This showed that wasting and stunting are closely linked (being wasted increases the likelihood of being stunted); increased susceptibility to wasting continues in a child even after they have recovered from a prior episode (indicating profound metabolic disturbances and/or environmental factors at play); the season in which a child is born strongly predicts their subsequent linear growth and weight gain; and boys are more wasted, stunted and concurrently wasted and stunted than girls.
Box 2: The MAMI story so far
Marie McGrath (ENN) and Marko Kerac (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)) shared that infants <6m old are now on the international policy agenda, a consequence of MAMI SIG influence. However, country-level policy and programmes are lacking, fuelled by weak evidence. Key issues that still need to be addressed include: how to achieve optimal growth among nutritionally vulnerable infants; how to deal with complex underlying diagnosis through feasible programming; and what does the ‘MAMI’ package of care look like (breastfeeding support is necessary but not sufficient). A reframing of thinking should consider prevention and treatment as one (infant and young child feeding (IYCF) = primary prevention; MAMI = secondary prevention; inpatient care = tertiary prevention); building bridges between MAMI and IYCF approaches; and embedding interventions in wider health programmes, such as integrated management of neonatal and child illness (MNCI). To achieve this, we urgently need strong evidence in the form of phase 3 RCTs and a robust, coordinated network of learning and exchange. The potential around MAMI is huge, but the needs are outstripping current group capacity. Scale up to a Global MAMI Network is needed to galvanise and support collective, collaborative, harmonised efforts on research and policy informed by, and to inform, practice.
An overview of recent key MAMI research and reviews was presented by Martha Mwangome and Jay Berkley (KEMRI-Wellcome, Kenya). How to define SAM in infants < 6m, the top question identified in a 2015 CHNRI MAMI research prioritisation exercise, has been a key focal area for the group. An ENN/LHSTM/ CHAIN review in 2017 identified MUAC and WAZ as the best anthropometric indices to identify at-risk infants <6m. Analysis of data from Keneba, Gambia, found WLZ was a poor predictor of mortality in this age group, while MUAC performed better. Another community cohort study of 2,882 infants admitted in Kilifi hospital, Kenya, with remote follow-up at three month visits of 1,455 discharged infants, showed that WAZ performed slightly better than MUAC at predicting inpatient mortality.
Cohort data (birth to one year of age, anthropometry and mortality data) from Burkina Faso is currently under analysis by the original researcher/ENN/LSHTM/KEMRI-Wellcome to investigate mortality outcomes in infants up to six months of age. This dataset includes anthropometry and mortality data and distinguishes low birth weight (LBW) infants, among whom mortality is significantly higher. Provisional analysis indicates that both MUAC and WAZ screening at vaccination time (two months of age) could pick up a particularly at-risk group.
An ongoing study by KEMRI/Welcome is exploring the role of breastfeeding in support and recovery of malnourished infants < 6m (Improving Breastfeeding support to treat Acute Malnutrition amongst Infants under 6 months (IBAMI). It aims to apply WHO treatment guidelines rigorously and evaluate impact on breastfeeding, growth, morbidity and mortality after discharge. Analysis of data to date found that infants discharged on the WHO breastfeeding discharge criteria had subsequent higher average MUAC, WLZ and WAZ than those who did not meet the criteria (though not statistically significant). A small study of the supplemental suckling technique in Malawi found perinatal depression was notable among mothers experiencing breastfeeding, which influenced breastfeeding effectiveness and early cessation.
Outstanding questions include: whether to use MUAC or LBW criteria to define risk at birth; the feasibility of introducing screening at every infant contact and how to link to growth monitoring; what package of support is needed for infants after discharge from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) treatment; how to manage infants without possibility to breastfeed; and gaps in guidance regarding non-feeding interventions (e.g. antibiotics, micronutrient supplementation).
Participants saw great potential to strengthen the synergies between WaSt and MAMI; several next steps were identified for further/shared analyses (e.g. implications for treatment, risk factors and seasonality using Gambia cohort data), and areas for attention (e.g. longer-term functional outcomes for MAMI interventions). Participants emphasised that country-level priorities must inform global initiatives and research priorities. Stronger research dissemination and related communication to catalyse uptake that builds on and connects existing platforms is needed and requires investment from bilateral donors and national governments.
A full report of the meeting is available here.
References
McDonald CM, Olofin I, Flaxman S, Fawzi WW, Spiegelman D, Caulfield LE, et al. The effect of multiple anthropometric deficits on child mortality: meta-analysis of individual data in 10 prospective studies from developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(4):896-901. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.047639. PubMed PMID: 23426036.
More like this
FEX: Management of At risk Mothers and Infants (MAMI) meeting
A one-day meeting of the Management of At risk Mothers and Infants (MAMI)1 Special Interest Group (SIG) took place in London on 17 January 2018. The meeting was hosted by ENN...
FEX: Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) meeting
On the 15th of January 2018 the Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) Technical Interest Group (TIG) held their third face-to-face meeting at Trinity College, Oxford. This group of 30...
FEX: Response to malnutrition treatment in low weight-for-age children: secondary analyses of ComPAS trial data
View this article as a pdf Research summary1 Location: Kenya and South Sudan What we know: Children who are concurrently wasted and stunted (WaSt) have a very high mortality...
WaSt TIG - the work so far
We have had three phases of work thus far and are currently in the fourth. A special section in FEX summarises a lot of the work of the WaSt TIG so far as well as experiences...
FEX: A reflection on the 2021 Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series through a WaSt lens
View this article as a pdf This article provides a summary of the Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series to date, reflecting upon the 2021 series from the perspective of the...
Resource: Bringing new evidence on undernutrition and mortality risk into practice- Protocol for a prospective cohort study
Introduction The ENN coordinated Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) have been investigating the relationship between wasting and stunting since 2014...
Wasting and Stunting: Evidence Generation
Within the WaSt TIG, we continue to generate evidence to increase the understanding of the relationship between wasting and stunting and what this tells us about their...
Wasting and Stunting: Overcoming the divide
Since the 1970s, those working in nutrition have categorised undernutrition in two major ways, children are either wasted or stunted. There has very rarely been consideration...
Blog post: Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child growth and nutrition specialists from academia, donor and operational...
FEX: The Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group: Summarising the work to date
This is a summary of a Field Exchange field article that was included in issue 67. The original article was authored by Natalie Sessions and Tanya Khara. Natalie Sessions is a...
Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Friday 16th February, 2017 By Carmel Dolan, ENN Technical Director Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child...
FEX: How do children with severe underweight and wasting respond to treatment?
View this article as a pdf This is a summary of the following paper: Odei Obeng-Amoako G, Stobaugh H, Wrottesley S et al (2023) How do children with severe underweight and...
Resource: The WaSt study Protocol and Opportunities for Collaboration: bringing new evidence on undernutrition and mortality risk into practice.
The ENN and the Wasting Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG), with funding from USAID via the Bureau of Humanitarian Affairs (BHA) and Bureau for Global Health, in 2018...
FEX: Finding the best criteria to identify children at high risk of mortality
View this article as a pdf This article is a summary of the following paper: Khara T, Myatt M, Sadler K, Bahwere P, Berkeley J, Black R (TBC) Anthropometric criteria for best...
FEX: The Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group: A summary of the work to date
View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici This article outlines the work of the Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group since its inception in...
FEX: Summary of wasting and stunting project meeting
In May, the Technical Interest Group (TIG) of the ENN-facilitated Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) project1 held its bi-annual meeting, made possible through the generous support of...
FEX: The relationship between wasting and stunting in young children: A systematic review
View this article as a pdf This article was written by Susan Thurstans, PhD candidate at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and consultant to ENN on the...
ENN Latest
New technical brief on Adolescent-specific reporting of nutritional status. How the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) update benefits policy and programming.This technical...
FEX: Child wasting and stunting: Time to overcome the separation
A briefing note for policy-makers and programme implementers was released in June 2018 by the ENN-coordinated Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG). The brief,...
FEX: WaSt Special Section Editorial
View this article as a pdf Dear readers, Our aim with this special section of Field Exchange (FEX) is to convey to you the scope of work that the Wasting and Stunting...
Reference this page
Making connections: Joint meeting of WaSt Technical Interest Group and MAMI Special Interest Group. Field Exchange 58, September 2018. p45. www.ennonline.net/fex/58/makingconnectionswastmami
(ENN_6100)