Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance
Research snapshot1
Measuring and reporting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance is a matter of accountability and is critical for the assessment of impact and value for money. A recent review identified eight methods of assessing humanitarian response appropriateness and assessed the key features and limitations of each. This review is part of a broader project to enhance the accountability of humanitarian responses through developing auditing approaches for real-time monitoring. The methods were found to vary considerably in their definitions of ‘appropriateness’, provide insufficient guidance on measurement, be vulnerable to interpretive bias, and frequently report findings in an ambiguous manner. They do not allow for assessment of changes in ‘appropriateness’ of a given response over time, nor comparison between responses. A conceptual framework is proposed based on the premise that the appropriateness of a response or intervention is determined by the extent to which it is designed to save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human dignity. Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework adapted to the health and nutrition sector.
The authors define ‘appropriate humanitarian assistance’ as a combination of (i) an intervention/package of services that addresses objective needs and threats to the health or welfare of crisis-affected populations; (ii) a modality of delivery that reflects the context, enhances user acceptability and promotes sustainability where possible; and (iii) having a target beneficiary population that is clearly defined, sufficient in size and prioritised according to need. This framework includes a specific set of questions relating to the ‘what/how/to whom’ domains of a humanitarian project or response; a semi-quantitative scorecard to score each of the questions/domains; and a brief narrative contextualisation of the findings. A data-collection tool and operational guidance are now being developed to test the method in a number of ongoing health and nutrition responses. The approach is designed for self-assessment by response teams for early course-correction and real-time ongoing evaluation to ultimately enhance governance, accountability and transparency in humanitarian response.
Figure 1: Proposed conceptual framework adapted for the nutrition and health sector
Endnotes
1Abdelmagid N, Checchi F, Garry S and Warsame A. Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance. Journal of International Humanitarian Action (2019) 4:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0062-y
More like this
FEX: The State of the Humanitarian System 2018 report
The fourth 'State of the Humanitarian System' report1, covering the three years from 2015 to 2017, is based on a review of over 200 evaluations of humanitarian action,...
FEX: Improving the way we address acute malnutrition in Africa’s drylands
View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici By Helen Young, Abdalmonim Osman, Dr. Marshak, Anne Radday, Emmanuella Olesambu, Nola Jenkins, Darana...
FEX: A Review of the advances and challenges in nutrition in conflicts and crises over the last 20 years
Abbreviated version of unpublished paper Food distribution at the ICRC kitchen in Tonj. By Frances Mason and Anna Taylor This paper is a shortened version of the complete...
FEX: Aid responses to Afghanistan: lessons from previous evaluations
Summary of report1 A review of over 50 formal evaluation reports was conducted by a Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Working party on Aid Evaluation (Organisation for...
FEX: 2011 Edition of the Sphere Handbook Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response
Farmers association level consultation at Chuko, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNPR) province, Ethiopia, August 2009 By Susan Thurstans, Paul Turnbull, Devrig...
FEX: Designing an inter-agency multipurpose cash transfer programme in Lebanon
By Isabelle Pelly Isabelle Pelly was Save the Children's Food Security & Livelihoods Adviser in Lebanon until September 2014, and co-chair of the Lebanon Cash Working Group....
FEX: Accountability to affected populations: Somalia Nutrition Cluster experiences
By Samson Desie and Meftuh Omer Ismail View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Samson Desie is a nutrition specialist currently working as...
FEX: Suggested New Design Framework for CMAM Programming
By Peter Hailey and Daniel Tewoldeberha Peter Hailey was a Regional Nutrition Specialist in the UNICEF East and Southern Africa Regional Office and is now Senior Nutrition...
FEX: Strengthening nutrition humanitarian action: Supporting humanitarian cluster/sector coordination transition
By Peter Hailey and Brenda Akwanyi Peter Hailey is founding Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Change (CHC), a humanitarian think tank based in East Africa. He has over...
FEX: Development of multi-cluster rapid and in-depth assessment methodologies in Afghanistan
By Anna Ziolkovska, Hassan Ali and Baseer Qureshi View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Anna Ziolkovska is currently the Nutrition Cluster...
FEX: Inappropriate Interventions in the Great Lakes
Summary of published research1 The aid community has reacted to many crises in the Great Lakes region with a multitude of interventions aimed explicitly at improving the food...
FEX: Framework for integration of management of SAM into national health systems
By Katrien Khoos and Anne Berton-Rafael Katrien Ghoos is the Nutrition Specialist on Management of Acute Malnutrition ,Nutrition Information Systems, Emergencies and Disaster...
FEX: Adapting to climate change
Summary of published paper1 A house destroyed by flooding in Bangladesh A special issue of the IDS bulletin contains a series of case studies from different countries showing...
FEX: Update on en-net discussions
By Tamsin Walters, en-net Moderator This is a summary of some of the 'hot' discussion topics on the online forum, en-net, www.en-net.org.uk since the last issue of Field...
FEX: ALNAP review of humanitarian system
Summary of published report1 A recently published report, commissioned under ALNAPs2 Humanitarian Performance Project, set out to chart the performance and progress of the...
FEX: Development of a competency framework for the nutrition in emergencies sector
Summary of published paper1 Location: Global What we know: There has been increased investment in and attention to professional development of humanitarian staff. There are...
FEX: Development of Rapid and Comprehensive Assessment Tools for Emergencies
At a recent meeting of the Inter Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Nutrition Cluster (see box) in Rome, work on assessment in emergencies was shared. An assessment sub-working...
FEX: Post-Rome integrated action: Experiences from North-eastern Nigeria
By Kirathi Reuel Mungai and Adeola Goriola Makanjuola View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Kirathi Reuel Mungai is a nutrition specialist...
FEX: Experiences of the ‘Whole of Syria’ coordination for nutrition
By Saja Farooq Abdullah and Lindsay Spainhour Baker View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici Dr Saja Abdullah is currently working as the 'Whole...
FEX: Global food price crisis: lessons and ideas for relief planners and managers
Summary of published research1 Food prices have increased by an average of 52% between 2007 and 2008. ALNAP2 has recently published a paper which aims to assist those agencies...
Reference this page
Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance. Field Exchange 61, November 2019. p34. www.ennonline.net/fex/61/humanitarianassistance
(fex.61.553)