Participation by the Affected Population in Relief Operations
Draft report for ALNAP
At its fourth meeting in October 1998, The ALNAP (the Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Assistance) noted that a recurring theme of discussion at its meeting had been the need to improve accountability to those affected by disasters and humanitarian crisis. A number of initiatives were taken as a result of this meeting including a study to identify empirically types of participation by beneficiaries and their communities over a geographically and socially limited area (i.e. south Sudan). The study was based on a description of the experience of some of the 12 UK based NGOs covered by the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) evaluation of the South Sudan humanitarian programme and involved three weeks field work in Nairobi, Lokichoggio and south Sudan. Among the questions specifically addressed by the study were the following:
- What were the types of participation utilised and why?
- Are programmes more effectively delivered if participatory?
- Is there value added beyond the programme if humanitarian assistance is delivered in a participatory fashion?
Findings of the study
The final report is a lengthy document covering aspects of beneficiary participation in the many sectors of humanitarian relief provision. For the purposes of this Field Exchange summary we will only highlight some of the findings that relate to the food and nutrition sector. For more information the reader is referred to the original report.
The study draws an important distinction between beneficiary participation which involves physical energy, e.g. constructing a feeding centre, and participation which involves engagement of the community mind, i.e. planning the intervention. The importance of 'social learning' is also highlighted. For example, although women and children are strictly the only beneficiaries of selective feeding programmes, men need to participate in a social learning sense. This became clear when for example, lack of proper information regarding the purpose of feeding centres resulted, during the early stages of the programme, in households who were receiving rations from the centre not being given the general food ration. The local distribution structure, dominated by men, failed to realise that feeding centre rations were meant for malnourished under fives only and not for the whole household.
A number of agency experiences of participation are summarised in the report. For example:
- Oxfam's use of focus group discussions and key informant interviews to enable the agency to identify vulnerable people for their emergency food and nutrition programme.
- SCF work with local authorities and SRRA representatives who were given responsibility to work with communities to decide who would receive assistance and draw up lists of vulnerable individuals. Through a vulnerability workshop, a call was made by participants to improve representation on the relief committees and ensure their involvement in distribution. Awareness of groups who were not receiving food was also raised and one practical resolution was made to directly and separately target families of children in feeding centres.
- Tear Fund's unique mobile SFP allowing increased beneficiary participation by making it easy for volunteers to work in the feeding centres. Because centres were small, contact between agency staff and beneficiaries was close, increasing opportunities for social learning.
Some Conclusions from the study
Justifications for a participatory approach to emergency aid provision:
- decision making structures still exist in societies affected by emergencies and constitute a valuable resource for agencies implementing emergency programmes;
- limited involvement of beneficiaries or levels of social learning can introduce inefficiencies into the programme;
- agencies have come to realise that it is almost impossible to understand vulnerability without making concerted efforts to involve the affected communities in the defining process. Understanding vulnerability is essential to targeting resources;
- even if targeting is not necessary, participation offers a channel for understanding and addressing issues such as gender relations and understanding the impact of relief on the livelihood system and the social structure in general.
Arguments against a participatory approach
The general belief is that there are some circumstances in which participation is not appropriate or desirable, e.g. in the acute phase of the emergency when there are high rates of mortality and morbidity and it is obvious what needs doing. However, even if the decision about what to provide is not made in a participatory manner, the effective distribution requires some level of participation by beneficiaries. Another issue that deserves consideration is the extent to which particular types of investigation, participation and social learning might result in loss of time and introduce inefficiencies into the programme. It may also be that agencies are reluctant to use participatory approaches for fear of generating unrealisable expectations. For example, in south Sudan, beneficiaries of tools and seeds requested some agencies to give them the tools ahead of the seeds so that they had enough time to work in their fields. Invariably, the agencies stated that they were not prepared to do the double distribution this request would involve. Another issue is whether some forms of participation are disruptive to community relations in terms of say, gender and the local political economy.
Reference
Pierson R.T. Nata. Participation by the Affected Population in Relief Operations: A Review of the Experience of DEC agencies during the response to the 1998 Famine in South Sudan.
More like this
FEX: Distributing food (Special Supplement 1)
Food may be distributed in many different ways but the method of distribution will, to a large extent, depend on the eligible groups and the method for identifying them....
FEX: Integration in CTC (Special Supplement 2)
by Jamie Lee Many of the articles in this supplement explore the concepts and practice of 'integration' within CTC programmes. A variety of meanings and values are attached to...
en-net: Nutrition Manager
Role & Responsibilities Assist in the direct implementation of nutrition interventions which may include treatment of severe acute malnutrition, moderate acute malnutrition,...
NEX: Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice Circles
Vimbai Chishanu et al., GOAL Field Exchange 47, p43 The Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice (NIPP) circle methodology is a community nutrition approach that aims to...
en-net: Health and Nutrition Manager
Role & Responsibilities Assist in the direct implementation of nutrition interventions which may include screening, treatment of severe acute malnutrition, moderate acute...
FEX: Targeting in complex emergencies: the cases of Somalia and Columbia
Summary of case studies1,2 An IDP camp in Somalia where the evaluation was undertaken. The World Food Programme (WFP) recently commissioned research to investigate the...
en-net: Surge Health & Nutrition Manager Emergency Response Team
Role & Responsibilities Provide short term support to the Emergency Response Team (ERT) in the direct implementation of health and nutrition interventions. May include...
en-net: Surge Health & Nutrition Manager Emergency Response Team
Provide short term support to the Emergency Response Team (ERT) in the direct implementation of health and nutrition interventions. May include screening and management of <...
FEX: Using care groups in emergencies in South Sudan
By Peter Ndungu and Julie Tanaka View this article as a pdf Peter Ndungu is a Nutrition Programme Manager with Samaritan's Purse South Sudan. He manages the Blanket and...
en-net: Emergency Response Team (ERT) Nutrition Project Manager
Role and Responsibilities To manage the Emergency Response Nutrition project(s) and team to ensure activities meet proposal objectives within appropriate timeliness and...
FEX: Community participation in targeting in South Sudan
Summary of research1 Women collect bags between air drops near the town of Habilla, West Dafur A recent study, carried out by the Feinstein International Centre and...
FEX: Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice: nutrition-specific intervention with nutrition-sensitive activities
By Sinead O'Mahony and Hatty Barthorp Sinead O'Mahony is the NIPP Global Project Manager and a member of the Technical Team of GOAL Global. Hatty Barthorp is Global Nutrition...
FEX: CTC in South Sudan - A Comparison of Agency Approaches and the Dilemmas Involved (Special Supplement 2)
Tanya Khara (Valid International), Jennifer Martin (Concern Worldwide), Ed Walker (Tearfund) Introduction In 2003 both Concern Worldwide and Tearfund asked Valid...
FEX: Gender impact analysis of unconditional cash transfers in south central Somalia
Summary of published research1 A woman tiedyes clothing Location: Somalia What we know already: Cash transfer programming can positively impact on nutrition and food...
FEX: CTC from Scratch - Tear Fund in South Sudan (Special Supplement 2)
By Ed Walker (Tearfund) Beneficiaries collecting their general ration in South Sudan. Tearfund has been working in Northern Bahr el Ghazal, southern Sudan, in the nutrition...
FEX: Principles and Practice for Food Distribution in Conflict
Summary of Published Review Field Exchange 10 highlighted a study underway by the Humanitarian Policy Group and Nutrition Works on the principles and practice for food...
FEX: Cash transfers in emergencies: a review of recent experiences
Summary of Review1 Recent programmes have been based on the idea of helping people recover livelihoods, rather than simply supporting survival. Above a women trading, Kinsha...
FEX: Update on Minimum Reporting Package (MRP) trainings in London and Nairobi
By Emily Mates, Nutrition Advisor, MRP, Save the Children UK The ‘Minimum Reporting Package’ (MRP) has been developed to support standardised data collection for emergency...
FEX: Task Force Review
Summary of a Report by SPLM/SRRA-OLS Bahr el Ghazal Displaced people arriving from Wau In response to the humanitarian crisis which unfolded in Bahr El Ghazal (BEG) last...
FEX: School Feeding Programme in Zambia
By Kate Vorley, PCI and Mary Corbett, ENN Kate Vorley has spent 12 years working in programme management at national and regional levels for international NGOs, faith based...
Reference this page
Participation by the Affected Population in Relief Operations. Field Exchange 7, July 1999. p23. www.ennonline.net/fex/7/participation
(ENN_3397)