USAID: How should we address wasting and stunting?
This is a summary of two Field Exchange articles published in issue 67. The original articles were a views article written by Erin Boyd and a summary of the following report: USAID Advancing Nutrition (2021) Stunting: Considerations for use as an indicator in nutrition projects. Arlington, VA: USAID Advancing Nutrition. Available at: https://www.advancingnutrition.org/resources/stunting-considerations-use-indicator-nutrition-projects
Erin Boyd is a Nutrition Advisor at the United States Agency of International Development’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance.
- Addressing wasting and stunting separately rather than jointly has resulted in missed opportunities to better understand and address undernutrition.
- The United States Agency of International Development (USAID) has invested in the work of the Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group to analyse the co-occurrence of wasting and stunting using existing data.
- These findings have been instrumental in informing USAID’s framework for defining and supporting the prevention of undernutrition.
- USAID has also contributed to discussions around the utility of stunting as an indicator, suggesting a need to incorporate a broader range of nutrition, health and development indicators when assessing nutrition programmes.
United States Agency of International Development (USAID) investments in Wasting and Stunting (WaSt)
USAID investments in nutrition include addressing wasting and stunting. For wasting, the focus has been on humanitarian contexts since resources and interventions target mortality reduction. Conversely, stunting has been equated with chronic undernutrition and has remained the focus in development contexts. However, USAID programme experiences and data have highlighted many humanitarian contexts where both wasting and stunting are a problem. In addition, many activities aiming to reduce or prevent stunting may also prevent wasting. Thus, there is an ongoing need to explore how wasting and stunting manifest at population and individual levels and how they might be related.
USAID sought to understand the relationships between wasting and stunting through an analysis of existing data in 2015/16 – the first analysis undertaken by the Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG). They then awarded a grant to ENN to explore the available data regarding the co-occurrence of wasting and stunting as well as the associated risk of mortality. Data was accessed from Standardised Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions (SMART) nutrition surveys, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys and Demographic and Health Surveys.
USAID has been investing in SMART nutrition surveys for over 15 years which include both weight-for-height (a measure of wasting) and height-for-age (a measure of stunting) data on the same children. However, the prevalence of each form of undernutrition had only been reported at an overall level, presenting a missed opportunity to look at the degree of overlap within individual children. Such analyses have contributed to an understanding of the implications of concurrent wasting and stunting, facilitated better targeting of USAID resources and supported advocacy for wasting programmes in non-humanitarian settings.
Influence of WaSt on the USAID approach
- Findings from the WaSt TIG work have prompted the USAID Nutrition Technical Working Group (NTWG) to examine geographic areas where overlapping wasting and stunting might require additional resources.
- The Bureau for Global Health and the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance jointly supported ENN to develop a study protocol to test weight-for-age as a possible diagnostic criterion within wasting treatment programmes. Since weight-for-age is measured in growth monitoring and promotion programmes, it may improve links between these programmes and other nutrition interventions towards a common goal of optimal growth.
- USAID recognises that manifestations of malnutrition can co-exist. Thus, limiting programmes to one form of malnutrition may limit their impact. The analysis completed by ENN, through the WaSt TIG, has helped USAID to frame how it defines and supports the prevention of undernutrition.
- USAID has three bureaus focusing on nutrition, the Bureau of Global Health, the Bureau for Resilience and Food Security and the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance. USAID has also created an internal Wasting Technical Working Group to better support wasting programming in non-humanitarian settings. Access to data on wasting and stunting supports collaboration between these entities towards addressing all forms of malnutrition.
Rethinking ‘stunting’ as an indicator in nutrition programmes
The separate approach to wasting and stunting in humanitarian and development contexts, respectively, has also led to a focus on stunting as a primary objective in development programmes. Together with its relative ease of collection and interpretation, this has promoted the use of stunting reduction as the primary indicator of programme success in many national and donor-funded nutrition programmes. Recent challenges to this approach led to the release of a report by USAID in 2021 which discussed how stunting has been misused as an indicator for the following reasons:
- Stunting is often equated with chronic undernutrition. In reality, stunting is a marker of a deficient environment in which a number of potential factors, including diet, caregiving, frequency and severity of illness and the use of health services, limit child growth and development. Thus, multiple and multi-sector interventions that address all causes are needed to improve the long-term outcomes for children.
- Stunting is a statistical measure and not necessarily indicative of healthy growth. Since the risks associated with stunting increase across a continuum, many children who are not classified as stunted may not be achieving their full growth potential while some children who are classified as stunted may not be in poor health.
- Not all nutrition interventions should be expected to reduce the prevalence of stunting. Improvements in linear growth are difficult to achieve over the short term in many contexts. In addition, some nutrition interventions have little effect on linear growth while many non-health-sector interventions such as poverty alleviation and education have substantially contributed to declines in stunting prevalence, especially for girls.
- Stunting does not capture the many important benefits of nutrition programmes. Assessing only stunting fails to reflect the many other positive effects of improved nutrition for biological, cognitive and behavioural outcomes.
While stunting is still a useful indicator in some cases, USAID proposed using a broader set of indicators to monitor and evaluate nutrition programmes, highlighting that:
- Nutrition programmes should measure a broad set of indicators that can be directly attributed to programme activities
- Selection of indicators should be informed by a logic model that reflects the full pathway between interventions and results incorporating a range of nutrition, health and development outcomes
- Stunting prevalence remains a useful population measure that reflects overall living conditions and welfare
- It is also useful to track progress at population level and to identify sub-groups of vulnerable children who may benefit from nutrition programmes
USAID greatly values the use of data for decision making. The WaSt story is a clear example of how available data can be used to answer different research questions. ENN and the WaSt TIG members played an important role in accessing the raw data. More common data-sharing between academic institutions and independent researchers would enable such analyses.
USAID continues to face a challenge in identifying the most effective activities for the prevention of undernutrition in different contexts. Better understanding of the links between stunting and wasting will support USAID (and others) to design programmes that address all forms of undernutrition. Ensuring that such programmes incorporate appropriate indicators is critical to tracking progress and supporting advocacy and scale-up.
More like this
FEX: USAID’s investment in the WaSt TIG
View this article as a pdf Erin Boyd is a Nutrition Advisor at the United States Agency of International Development's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance. Why has the United...
FEX: The Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group: Summarising the work to date
This is a summary of a Field Exchange field article that was included in issue 67. The original article was authored by Natalie Sessions and Tanya Khara. Natalie Sessions is a...
FEX: The Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group: A summary of the work to date
View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici This article outlines the work of the Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group since its inception in...
Resource: The WaSt study Protocol and Opportunities for Collaboration: bringing new evidence on undernutrition and mortality risk into practice.
The ENN and the Wasting Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG), with funding from USAID via the Bureau of Humanitarian Affairs (BHA) and Bureau for Global Health, in 2018...
FEX: WaSt Special Section Editorial
View this article as a pdf Dear readers, Our aim with this special section of Field Exchange (FEX) is to convey to you the scope of work that the Wasting and Stunting...
FEX: Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) meeting
On the 15th of January 2018 the Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) Technical Interest Group (TIG) held their third face-to-face meeting at Trinity College, Oxford. This group of 30...
FEX: Child wasting and stunting: Time to overcome the separation
A briefing note for policy-makers and programme implementers was released in June 2018 by the ENN-coordinated Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG). The brief,...
WaSt TIG - the work so far
We have had three phases of work thus far and are currently in the fourth. A special section in FEX summarises a lot of the work of the WaSt TIG so far as well as experiences...
FEX: A reflection on the 2021 Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series through a WaSt lens
View this article as a pdf This article provides a summary of the Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series to date, reflecting upon the 2021 series from the perspective of the...
Blog post: Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child growth and nutrition specialists from academia, donor and operational...
Wasting and Stunting: Overcoming the divide
Since the 1970s, those working in nutrition have categorised undernutrition in two major ways, children are either wasted or stunted. There has very rarely been consideration...
Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Friday 16th February, 2017 By Carmel Dolan, ENN Technical Director Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child...
FEX: Considering the use of ‘stunting’ as an indicator in nutrition projects
View this article as a pdf This is a summary of the following report: USAID Advancing Nutrition (2020) Stunting: Considerations for use as an indicator in nutrition projects....
FEX: ENN hosted Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group meeting
By Tanya Khara, ENN WaSt Project Consultant On January 29th 2016, the ENN with USAID OFDA and Irish Aid funding convened the second meeting of the Wasting and Stunting (WaSt)...
Blog post: Child wasting and stunting - are we where we need to be?
We've been on a high this week with the publication of the Viewpoint from the ENN coordinated Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG). 'Beyond wasted and...
Resource: Bringing new evidence on undernutrition and mortality risk into practice- Protocol for a prospective cohort study
Introduction The ENN coordinated Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) have been investigating the relationship between wasting and stunting since 2014...
FEX: The relationship between wasting and stunting: policy, programming and research implications
Summary of review1 This summary was prepared by Tanya Khara, an independent consultant engaged by the ENN on this review. The review was made possible by the generous support...
FEX: Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group: two new publications from the research-influencing sub-working group
View this article as a pdf The research-influencing sub-working group of the Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt-TIG) has recently published two papers aimed...
FEX: Summary of wasting and stunting project meeting
In May, the Technical Interest Group (TIG) of the ENN-facilitated Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) project1 held its bi-annual meeting, made possible through the generous support of...
The publication of two long-awaited, landmark papers from the Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) coordinated by ENN, is a valuable contribution to the...
Reference this page
Erin Boyd (). USAID: How should we address wasting and stunting?. FEX 67 Digest, May 2022. www.ennonline.net/fexdigest/67/wastusaid