Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: some thoughts on a recently published systematic review by Susan Thurstans
This week I have been delighted to finally see the publication of my paper reviewing sex differences in undernutrition which forms part of my PhD studies at LSHTM. I was introduced to the interesting, yet emotive subject of sex differences by my primary PhD supervisor Marko Kerac and have since teamed up with an advisory group full of brilliant people from various disciplines and backgrounds, including a subgroup of ENN’s Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) Technical Interest Group (TIG).
The results from the analysis essentially show that boys are more likely to be wasted, stunted and underweight when compared with girls, with variance by context. It also showed that as a sector, whilst data should be routinely collected on sex, it is not systematically analysed and reported. Where it is, explanations are often conjectural.
I think its safe to say that many of us in the sector have been surprised that boys appear to be at higher risk of undernutrition than girls and have been apprehensive at how this will be received, especially given the enormous efforts of the sector and wider global health community to promote equity in gender. It’s this point though that I have found is often confused: there is a difference between sex and gender. Whilst this work shows boys have higher odds of being malnourished, it does not question that women and girls remain disproportionately affected by gender inequity and that efforts to address this are vital. Rather, it is about understanding what makes a child vulnerable to undernutrition. With a shift in the sector towards targeting risk of adverse outcomes rather than nutritional status per se, this seems vital to unpick. Within neonatal and infant health fields, the concept of male vulnerability is well accepted. Our results show that male sex is almost consistently found to be a risk factor for undernutrition. In the same way that we strive to understand and address other risk factors for undernutrition, this work aims to unpack some of the complexities of sex differences, to understand the mechanisms and reasons behind them.
If nothing else, we hope that this work helps in the interpretation of programme data. Since the outset of this work, I have heard many stories of programme staff questioning programme quality and equity when male admission numbers are higher than female admissions. I hear stories of donors questioning numbers as a reflection of poor programme outreach and an indicator of gender inequality and have also read forum discussions to this effect. This is no surprise given that most high-level policies in the sector explicitly focus on the vulnerability of women and girls without mention of the vulnerability of boys. Ultimately understanding the different risks for boys and girls should help to achieve an overall focus on the most vulnerable children. Whilst the implications of these findings are limited at this point, I hope the findings raise awareness of early male vulnerability and give programme staff the confidence to not make assumptions but interpret their own results in light of national and regional patterns of sex ratios in nutritional status.
What next? There are so many unanswered questions that remain, and we hope ongoing work will begin to provide some answers. Next steps in collaboration with the WaSt TIG include completing a paper looking at possible reasons for sex differences, and an analysis which will focus on breaking down anthropometry, age and sex with case estimates and mortality risks to deepen understanding of the potential implications for policy within the health and nutrition spheres. Personally, I remain fascinated by some of these findings, and look forward to these next steps.
Read the full paper here.
We would love to hear your thoughts and reactions on this topic. You can do this by contacting Susan (susan.thurstans@lshtm.ac.uk) or the ENN WaSt TIG coordinator (tanya@ennonline.net) directly or by starting a new discussion (head to the top of this blog, beneath our share buttons on the right). The work referred to above was made possible by funding to ENN from Irish Aid and the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
More like this
WaSt TIG - the work so far
We have had three phases of work thus far and are currently in the fourth. A special section in FEX summarises a lot of the work of the WaSt TIG so far as well as experiences...
FEX: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition
View this article as a pdf Research snapshot1 Despite considerable research into childhood sex differences in neonatal and infant health, different disciplines tend to hold...
FEX: Understanding sex differences in childhood malnutrition
View this article as a pdf This is a summary of the following paper: Thurstans S, Opondo C, Seal A, Wells J, Khara T, Dolan C et al (2021) Understanding sex differences in...
Wasting and Stunting: Evidence Generation
Within the WaSt TIG, we continue to generate evidence to increase the understanding of the relationship between wasting and stunting and what this tells us about their...
FEX: Wasting and Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG) meeting
On the 15th of January 2018 the Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) Technical Interest Group (TIG) held their third face-to-face meeting at Trinity College, Oxford. This group of 30...
FEX: Child wasting and stunting: Time to overcome the separation
A briefing note for policy-makers and programme implementers was released in June 2018 by the ENN-coordinated Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group (WaSt TIG). The brief,...
FEX: WaSt Special Section Editorial
View this article as a pdf Dear readers, Our aim with this special section of Field Exchange (FEX) is to convey to you the scope of work that the Wasting and Stunting...
en-net: Urgent: Weight for Height Z-scores: Unisex Z-score table used in West African countries vs. calculated Z score values
In the 2011 Guidelines for THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE ACUTE MALNUTRITION published by ACF, Annex 4 depicts a Weight-for-Height table. This same table has been adopted...
en-net: Probable reasons for a significantly higher rates of acute malnutrition in boys than girls
In a context where underweight, stunting is more than 50% we have significantly higher rates of wasting in boys than girls. other food security situation are as poor food...
FEX: The Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group: A summary of the work to date
View this article as a pdf Lisez cet article en français ici This article outlines the work of the Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group since its inception in...
Blog post: Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child growth and nutrition specialists from academia, donor and operational...
Resource: Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition
Abstract Background Excess male morbidity and mortality is well recognised in neonatal medicine and infant health. In contrast, within global nutrition, it is commonly...
Wasting and Stunting-making progress on understanding the links
Friday 16th February, 2017 By Carmel Dolan, ENN Technical Director Some of you will know that ENN has been coordinating a project with the expert steer of around 30 child...
FEX: Summary of wasting and stunting project meeting
In May, the Technical Interest Group (TIG) of the ENN-facilitated Wasting and Stunting (WaSt) project1 held its bi-annual meeting, made possible through the generous support of...
en-net: CMAM admission by MUAC gender biased?
I am currently analysing OTP patient cards from Concern's CMAM pilot in Bardiya, Nepal and found the following: In total I have 1469 new admissions registered. According to...
FEX: A reflection on the 2021 Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series through a WaSt lens
View this article as a pdf This article provides a summary of the Lancet Maternal & Child Nutrition Series to date, reflecting upon the 2021 series from the perspective of the...
FEX: Can anthropometry measure gender discrimination?
Summary of published research1 A baby girl in Bangladesh. Sex differences in life expectancy and child survival in Bangladesh have been attributed to discrimination against...
FEX: The relationship between wasting and stunting: a retrospective cohort analysis of longitudinal data in Gambian children from 1976 to 2016
View this article as a pdf Summary of research1 Location: Gambia What we know: There are gaps in understanding the relationship between wasting and stunting that often...
Podcast: Sex Differences Podcast
In this podcast, ENN's Tanya Khara discusses with WaSt TIG members Susan Thurstans and Michel Garenne, collaborative work that they have led exploring patterns of sex...
FEX: ENN hosted Wasting-Stunting Technical Interest Group meeting
By Tanya Khara, ENN WaSt Project Consultant On January 29th 2016, the ENN with USAID OFDA and Irish Aid funding convened the second meeting of the Wasting and Stunting (WaSt)...